S.-G. Liu et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 97 (2012) 464–469
465
Synthesis of [Cd(bpbp)Cl2] (1)
Introduction
To an alcohol solution (10 ml) of CdCl2 (367 mg, 2.0 mmol) was
added an alcohol solution (20 ml) of bpbp (927 mg, 2.0 mmol). The
reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature.
White crystals were obtained from room evaporation of alcohol,
yield 993 mg (76%). Anal. Calcd. for C31H21Cl2N5Cd ([Cd(bpbp)Cl2]):
C, 57.56%; H, 3.27%; N, 10.83%. Found: C, 57.29%; H, 3.41%; N,
10.73%. Selected IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 3448, 1658, 1495, 1443,
1378, 1255, 1106, 1061, 1002, 877, 808, 755, 679.
In recent years, luminescent metal complexes have attracted an
increasing attention in many areas of chemistry, biology, medical
and material science [1–9]. Their functions as emitter material in
luminescence devices and luminescent chemosensor are particu-
larly prominent. Luminescent chemosensor have the advantage
of possessing high sensitivity and selectivity, as well as providing
online and real-time analysis [10–12]. One of simple strategy for
designing luminescent coordination compounds is to organize d10
electronic configuration metal ions with chromophore ligand. The
origins of emission arise from the transitions of p⁄
–p within ligand.
Synthesis of [Cd(bpbp)2](ClO4)2ÁCH3CH2OH (2)
This emission could be efficiently enhanced in coordination com-
plex due to increasing of the rigidity of the ligand and reducing
of energy loss by radiationless thermal vibrations [13,14]. The de-
sign and synthesis of desired structure luminescent complex is a
challenge because the assembly of metal ion with ligand is sensi-
tive to the delicate synthetic conditions [15].
To an alcohol solution (10 ml) of Cd(ClO4)Á6H2O (420 mg,
2.0 mmol) was added an alcohol solution (20 ml) of bpbp
(993 mg, 2.0 mmol). The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min
at room temperature. On recrystallization from ethanol, white
crystals were obtained. Yield: 987 mg (79%). Anal. Calcd. for
2,6-Bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine usually functions as triden-
tate ligand, but the five N atoms all can coordinate to metal center
ion, even if with the same central ion, different counter-anion
involved, different pH value, will result in different complex
[16,17]. The author investigated the syntheses, structures and their
blue luminescent properties of Zn(II), Cd(II), In(III) dichloride com-
plexes based on 2,6-bis(benzimidazolyl)pyridine [18,19]. 2,6-Bis-
(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine can easily be tailored at NH group
[20]. The substitution of the N–H bond of 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-
yl)pyridine will change their many properties (e.g. acid–base
degree, solubility and photophysical properties). The luminescence
analysis is favorable to trace analysis for such environmental toxic
ions as cadmium. It is necessary to investigate that how cadmium
ions coordinate to luminescent chromophore so as to set up lumi-
nescence analysis method of cadmium. As part of our continuing
studies, herein we synthesized two cadmium complexes based
on 2,6-bis(1-phenylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine (bpbp) to investi-
gate their luminescent properties.
C
64H48N10Cl2O9Cd ([Cd(bpbp)2](ClO4)2ÁCH3CH2OH): C, 59.85, H,
3.77% N, 10.90%: C, 59.49%, 3.81, N, 10.60%. Selected IR data (KBr,
cmÀ1): 3473, 3065, 1594, 1502, 1460, 1411, 1378, 1336, 1293,
1200, 1094, 1002, 877, 818, 750, 696, 617.
X-ray crystallography
Single crystal structure determination complexes were per-
formed on a Bruker SMART APEX CCD diffractometer equipped
with a normal focus, 3 kW sealed tube X-ray source and graphite
monochromated Mo–K radiation (k = 0.71073 Å) at 173 K, operat-
a
ing at 50 kV and 30 mA. The structures were solved by direct meth-
ods by using program SHELXTL. Absorption correction adopted
semi-empirical from equivalents. Fourier difference techniques,
and refined by full-matrix least-squares. All non-hydrogen atoms
in both structures were refined anisotropic displacement parame-
ters. All hydrogen atoms were theoretically added. The crystal data
are summarized in Table 1. Selected bond lengths and angles for
complex 1 are listed in Table 2, complex 2 listed in Table 3.
Table 1
Crystallographic data for complex 1 and complex 2.
Complex 1
31H21CdCl2N5
646.83
Monoclinic
C2/c
27.427(3)
13.4495(15)
14.8381(17
90
106.635(2)
90
5244.4(10)
8
1.638
Complex 2
Experimental
Formula
Formula weight
Crystal system
Space group
a/Å
C
C64H47CdCl2N10O9
1283.42
Triclinic
General
P-1
13.4791(15)
13.8506(16)
16.5839(19)
94.202(2)
106.948(2)
94.872(2)
2935.3(6)
2
1.452
0.531
1332.0
0.12 Â 0.15 Â 0.18
1.59, 27.08
À17 6 h 6 17
À17 6 k 6 17
À21 6 l 6 21
10333, 829
o-Phenylenediamine, pyridine-2,6-dicaboxyl acid and bromo-
benzene were purchased from Shanghai Aladdin Reagent Company.
All the chemicals and solvents used were analytically pure and
without further purification. The analyses (C, H and N) were made
on a Perkin–Elmer 240C elemental analyzer. 1H NMR spectroscopic
measurements were carried out on a Bruker AM-300 NMR spec-
trometer, using TMS (SiMe4) as an internal reference. The solid
infared spectra (IR) were obtained from a Bruker IFS66V vacuum-
type FT–IR spectrophotometer by using KBr pellets. The UV absorp-
tion spectra were recorded on a model UV-240 spectrophotometer
(Shimadzu, Japan). Fluorescence measurements were performed on
a Model RF-5 spectrofluorimeter (Shimadzu, Japan). 2,6-bis(1-
phenylbenzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine was synthesized according to
the literature [21,22]. This ligand structure was confirmed by
element analysis IR, and 1H NMR. Element analysis for C31H21N5,
found: C, 80.22; H, 4.67; N, 15.10, calculated: C, 80.32; H, 4.57; N,
15.11. Selected IR data (KBr, cmÀ1): 3417, 1674, 1588, 1503, 1439,
1392, 1336, 1250, 1147, 1072, 1002, 933, 874, 830, 744, 685, 575,
541, 502, 421 and 1H NMR: (CDCl3): 6.99 (d, 4H), 7.184–7.367(m,
12H), 7.876 (t, 3H), 8.08 (d, 2H).
b/Å
c/Å
a
/°
b/°
c
/°
V/Å3
Z
Density calc.mg.mÀ3
Absorption coefficient (mmÀ1
F(000)
)
1.068
2592
Crystal size
Theta range for data collection
Index ranges
0.12 Â 0.17 Â 0.47
1.5, 27.0
À24 6 h 6 35
À14 6 k 6 17
À17 6 l 6 18
5763, 352
15379, 5763, 0.032 21182, 10218, 0.025
1.09
0.6336, 0.8825
4407
R1 = 0.0327
wR2 = 0.0867
Nref, Npar
Tot., Uniq. Data, R(int)
GOF on F2
1.08
0.909, 0.938
8524
R1 = 0.0269
wR2 = 0.2873
À0.99, 1.29
Max. and min. transmission
Observed data [I > 2.0 sigma(I)]
R indices (all, data) R1, wR2
Largest diff. peak and hole e.ÅÀ3 À0.46, 0.66