Communication
such as Ru, Rh, Pd, Cu, Ni, and Fe were not as efficient as our
catalytic system (either serious decomposition of starting ma-
terials or only low yields of 2 was observed). Interestingly,
a 33% yield of product 2 was also achieved by using air as the
oxidant (entry 14). It is noteworthy that this protocol was con-
ducted without the need for moisture-proof conditions
(entry 15). Typically the reaction will proceed to completion in
DMSO within 6 h, in a clean manner, under one atmosphere of
O2.
Scheme 1. A new strategy towards azaindazole and indazole through CÀH
functionalization without using transition metal.
Having identified these optimal conditions, we set out to ex-
plore the scope for this new reaction. A variety of aromatic hy-
drazines, and aromatic ketones were surveyed to prepare dif-
ferent 3-alkyl azaindazoles and indazoles. As displayed in
Table 2, the scope of the ring substituents was found to be
very broad. Diverse azaindazole and indazole derivatives were
prepared readily from corresponding aromatic hydrazones. A
variety of ortho-, meta-, and para-substituted aryl groups, as
well as the electron-rich and electron-deficient aryl groups
were well tolerated. For instance, modest to good yields were
observed with substrates which contain strong electron-with-
drawing groups, such as NO2 and CF3 (3i and n). Various 3-
alkyl groups including adamantyl, tert-butyl, isopropyl, cyclo-
hexyl, trifluoromethyl, diphenylmethyl, and 3-pentyl are com-
patible with the conditions to afford correponding 3-alkylind-
azoles (3a–j). Pleasingly, 4-azaindazole products (3l–q) were
prepared with satisfactory yields with 2-acyl pyridine deriva-
tives. Interestingly, when 3-acyl pyridine was employed, only
regioisomeric 7-azaindazole product (3k) was formed and no
corresponding 5-azaindazole counterpart was observed. For
some substrates, such as 3g, i, and l, steric hindrance, strong
electron-withdrawing groups and the low reactivity of pyridine
may account for the relative low yields.
Table 1. Optimization of the reaction conditions.
Entry Additives
T [8C]
Yield [%]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
80
110
130
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
140
0
24
48
55
72
73
63
75
65
57
76
85
83
33
59
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.1 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.5 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaOAc (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/K2CO3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/DMAP (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/DABCO (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NEt3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (0.5 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (2.0 equiv)
14[b] TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
15[c] TEMPO (0.3 equiv)/NaHCO3 (1.0 equiv)
16
With metals such as Ru, Rh, Pd, Cu, Ni or Fe Low yields (<30%)
[a] Isolated yield; [b] under 1 atmosphere air (54% of starting material re-
mained); [c] 2.0 equivalents of H2O was added
Gratifyingly, the scope of this intramolecular cyclization reac-
tion was further successfully expanded to the synthesis of 3-
aryl substituted azaindazole and indazole derivatives as well
(Table 3). Varied aryl hydrazines were employed to smoothly
provide desired products (4a–p). Impressively, a broad func-
tional group compatibility was observed with this reaction, in-
cluding 2,4,6-trichlorophenyl group (4k) which is strongly elec-
tron-withdrawing and sterically demanding. It is noteworthy
that those functional groups (CN, CO2Et, halides, NO2 etc.) can
readily undergo further chemical manipulations to give very di-
verse compounds. For unsymmetric diaryl ketone substrates,
two regioisomers of indazoles were obtained (4q–t and 5). In
most cases, the more electron-rich parts would react preferen-
tially. If phenyl(pyridinyl)methanones were used, both ind-
azoles and azaindazoles would be formed (4u–y). Interestingly,
in the case of phenyl(pyridin-3-yl)methanone substrate, only
two regioisomers of azaindazoles (4v and v‘) were observed
and no corresponding indazole product can be found.
phere of O2 to test our hypothesis (Table 1). Although no reac-
tion occurred in the initial temperature range (80–1008C), we
were pleased to observe the desired azaindazole 2 in 24%
yield after stirring for 10 h (entry 2) at elevated temperature
(1108C). Encouraged by this preliminary result, we started to
optimize the reaction conditions. After
a comprehensive
screening, we found that DMSO was superior over other sol-
vents, such as DMF, DMA, alcohols, and 1,4-dioxane, etc. It was
observed that higher temperatures (such as 1408C) could
speed up the reactions and improve the yields. Moreover, we
found that the yields notably increased and reactions went to
completion in a shorter time with the addition of a base such
as NaHCO3 or DMAP (entries 8 and 12; DMAP=4-dimethylami-
nopyridine). It was believed that the base would serve as
a proton shuttle and assist the transformation. There is only
slight differences with higher TEMPO/base loadings in terms of
reaction rates and conversion ratios (entry 13). In the absence
of base and TEMPO, the yield will suffer a significant drop.
Generally, 0.1–0.3 equivalents amount of TEMPO and 1.0 equiv-
alent of base was enough to effectively promote the reaction.
Control experiments using various metal catalysts (entry 16),
To prove both practicality and effectiveness of this method
in the large-scale synthesis, we prepared 3-alkyl and 3-arylind-
azole products 3b, 4p and 5 on a gram-scale (Scheme 2). It
was found the large-scale reactions can be smoothly promoted
under the optimized conditions in excellent yields. Remarkably,
we were very pleased to notice that the yields of large-scale
reactions are generally better than their small-scale counter-
Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 3932 – 3938
3933
ꢀ 2014 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim