ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
Letter
and the ligand occur. The first step was to find acyclic tether
molecules that have a population of conformers similar to the
ones induced by the cyclic tether (Figure 1d), which in the
present study would require that the two oxygens linked to the
carbohydrate be gauche to each other. Ideally, these acyclic
tethers should be tunable. Conservative modification of the
factors at the origin of the conformational bias (e.g., X and Y in
Figure 1d) should lead to different populations of conformers,
thus allowing for a more extensive exploration of the
surrounding chemical space. The conformation of those
molecules should also be verifiable using spectroscopic
techniques.
The use of a polysaccharide as a starting point for the
development of a ligand is challenging. These complex
molecules have often low affinity and poor druglike properties.
The presence of cyclic monosaccharides, which are quite rigid
from a conformation standpoint, also complicates the
exploration of the surrounding binding space of the ligand.
Replacing some of these monosaccharides, not directly involved
in the binding to the receptor, by simple semirigid tethers with
a given conformational bias should facilitate the exploration of
the receptor, while decreasing the carbohydrate character of the
competing putative ligand.
Figure 1. Strategy. (a) Structure of sLex. The functionalities involved
in binding to E- and P-selectin proteins and the amino acid residues
implicated are illustrated. (b) Example of a cyclic tether. (c) Example
of an acyclic tether. (d) Acyclic tether with a defined conformational
bias.
The interest of developing an acyclic tether to replace the
GlcNAc unit stemmed from our research program in synthetic
methodologies. X-ray analysis of tartrate esters derivatives
shows that the two carbon−oxygen bonds at C2 and C3 are
gauche to each other, while the esters are anti.18,19 Two factors
could be at the origin of this conformational bias: the
minimization of the dipole−dipole effect induced by the esters
and the gauche effect resulting from the vicinal diol. To further
maximize the biological activity of our pseudodisaccharide, we
also considered optimizing the galactose subunit. Sialyl Lewisx
analogues having a cyclic tether replacing GlcNAc, wherein one
or more hydroxyl groups of the galactose have been replaced by
benzoate esters, was shown to have, in certain cases, improved
potencies.17 To examine this phenomenon with our analogues,
we decided to evaluate in this pilot study a compound bearing a
benzoate at C4, a docking experiment suggesting a favorable
interaction with the Tyr 94 of P-selectine. An analogue bearing
a C4-naphtoate group was also examined. While having similar
physicochemical properties, its binding to Tyr 94 of the P-
selectin might be precluded for steric encumbrance reasons.
The synthesis of sLex analogues bearing an acyclic tartrate
unit offers significant challenges, including the stereochemical
control of the O-glycosidation reactions at the anomeric
position of the galactose and the fucose subunits. The first
series of analogues were prepared by introducing the tartrate
tether on benzylated thioethyl fucoside 1 by a kinetic α-
selective glycosylation in presence of NIS to give 3 (Scheme
1).20 The latter was coupled to thioethyl galactoside 4 with an
anchimeric C2 group assistance to generate 5 with high 1,2-
trans selectivity on the galactose unit.21 After Zemplen
deacetylation of 5, the C4-Gal and C6-Gal alcohols were
protected with a benzylidene acetal yielding 6. C3-regioselec-
tive alkylations through in situ formation of organotin oxides
derivatives of 6 in the presence of 7 or 8 and CsF led to sLex
analogues 9 and 10, after Pd/C-catalyzed hydrogenations.
The synthesis of sLex analogues 18 and 19 with benzoate or
naphtoate at the C4-Gal position was more challenging because
the use of a C2-Gal ester protecting group, which would allow
anchimeric participation favoring the β-attack of the incoming
nucleophile, was precluded (Scheme 2). Another protecting
was noted for the GlcNAc moiety, confirming its role as a
tether holding in space the fucose and galactose. Similar
conclusions were reached independently through the synthesis
of sLex analogues.6−10 The pharmacophores of sLex being
identified, the modification of the GlcNAc, and the addition of
supplementary binding sites on the galactose and the fucose
were considered by us and others.
Two scenarios are classically explored to replace a cyclic
structural subunit, not directly involved in binding, of a given
biologically active molecule, such as sLex. The first consists of
replacing the cyclic GlcNAc by another cyclic tether.11−14 This
strategy has the advantage of allowing the rapid generation of
molecules with activity similar to the original ligand (e.g., sLex).
Although used successfully to achieve potent antagonists
(Figure 1b),12 this approach renders difficult the full
exploration of the chemical space of the CRD, because the
cyclic tether that holds the two sugars imposes a conforma-
tional bias that cannot be easily modified. Notwithstanding the
positive impact of these modifications on the overall biological
profile of a given analogue (stability), we are facing the same
lack of molecular plasticity that was present with the original
ligand. A second scenario consists of linking the fucose and
galactose derivatives by an acyclic tether, which could enable a
better probing of the CRD (Figure 1c).15,16 Obviously, with
this strategy, the molecule could reach potentially new binding
sites because of its plasticity. However, the lack of a
preorganized “bioactive”17 conformation in the ground state
could lead to entropic penalties and a decrease in potency.
Herein, we propose a novel and complementary strategy that
involves the replacement of the cyclic subunit of the motif by
an acyclic tether with a defined conformational bias (the ATC-
B strategy). This strategy, as depicted in (Figure 1d), aims at
taking advantage of the two approaches previously described.
On one hand, we will benefit from an alignment of the
pharmacophores similar to the one induced by GlcNAc (panels
a and b). On the other hand, we could benefit from the
increased plasticity of the acyclic tether. This could be
advantageous in the context of the induced fit occurring during
binding, whereas conformational changes in both the receptor
1046
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ml300263x | ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3, 1045−1049