Table 1 Antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing properties of the
synthesized compounds, and their binding energies at the colchicine site
analogue 21 bound to the colchicine site in orientations similar to
that of 1. It should be noted that cis-lactone derivatives are
significantly less active as revealed by literature reports4–6 as well
as the results of the present investigation demonstrating decreased
activity associated with cis-lactone analogues 22–24 and the
absence of comparable binding modes in docking simulations.
Our mechanistic experiments confirm that compounds 21 and 11
retain the antitubulin mode of action of epipodophyllotoxin. Thus,
11 was found to arrest cancer cells in the G2/M phase of the cell
cycle, exhibit little toxicity toward normal primary blood lympho-
cytes and (together with 21) display microtubule-destabilizing
activity in vitro using a fluorimetry-based tubulin polymerization
assay13 (see ESIw for details). In addition, to determine the extent
of microtubule disruption in whole cells, HeLa cells were cul-
tured in the presence of a carrier control (DMSO) or compounds
2, 10, 11 and 21 at the half maximal growth inhibitory concen-
tration and examined for microtubule morphology (Fig. 5). In
contrast to DMSO-treated cells that displayed normal interphase
and mitotic microtubule organization (A and F), compounds 2,
10, 11 and 21 all affected spindle morphology (G–J). Reengi-
neered epipodophyllotoxin 11 exhibited the most potent desta-
bilizing activity, completely blocking spindle formation (G) and
disrupting all but the most stable microtubules in interphase
cells (B). Compounds 10, 2 and 21 had no effect on the
relatively stable interphase microtubules (C–E), but did result
in shorter spindle lengths, as evidenced by 13, 7.5 and 15.2%
decreases in pole-to-pole distances, respectively (H–J).
GI50a/mM
Apoptosis (%) Binding
Jurkat
#
HeLa
MCF-7
energiesc/kJ molÀ1
1
2
0.030 Æ 0.002 0.018 Æ 0.002 37.5 Æ 1.9
À9.3
À9.2
À8.1
nd
0.36 Æ 0.09 0.24 Æ 0.00 30.0 Æ 1.2
10 0.016 Æ 0.002 0.014 Æ 0.001 27.7 Æ 3.2
18 30.8 Æ 7.9
23.7 Æ 0.8
4.4 Æ 0.2
46.9 Æ 0.7
8.0 Æ 1.3
7.0 Æ 1.0
7.5 Æ 0.4
19
3.4 Æ 0.1
À7.0
20 42.2 Æ 1.0
21 0.22 Æ 0.00
11 0.56 Æ 0.01
22 56.9 Æ 3.4
23 41.4 Æ 3.0
24 12.9 Æ 2.4
nd
0.23 Æ 0.01 28.5 Æ 1.3
0.43 Æ 0.05 39.7 Æ 0.8
À8.6
À8.4
nd
nd
nd
79.7 Æ 0.1
24.1 Æ 1.4
5.9 Æ 0.1
7.3 Æ 0.6
7.7 Æ 1.4
7.4 Æ 0.7
a
Concentration required to reduce the viability of cells by 50% after
48 h of treatment with indicated compounds, relative to DMSO
b
control Æ SD, determined by MTT assay. % Apoptotic cells after
24 h of treatment with indicated compounds at the concentration of
300 nM relative to DMSO control Æ SD, determined by flow cyto-
c
metric Annexin-V/propidium iodide assay. Binding energies revealed
by Autodock Vina simulations, nd = no comparable binding pose.
(a model for human T-cell leukemia) and calculated their binding
energies using docking simulations (Table 1). The results indicated
that in accordance with the literature data 2 was about an order of
magnitude less potent in its antiproliferative effects than 1. Analo-
gue 11, together with its dihydronaphthalene variant 21, exhibited
submicromolar antiproliferative activity and potent apoptosis-
inducing properties rivaling those of 2, in spite of their racemic
nature. In addition, these four compounds displayed good binding
affinities as revealed by Autodock simulations. This can also be
seen in Fig. 4 visually demonstrating that the matching enantiomer
of reengineered epipodophyllotoxin 11 and its dihydronaphthalene
In conclusion, using our MCR-based mimetic scaffold
approach we conceived and synthesized an epipodophyllotoxin
analogue possessing a variant structural skeleton. Despite being
racemic, this compound rivals the natural cyclolignan in its
antiproliferative and apoptosis-inducing properties and induces
dramatic microtubule disorganization effects in whole cells.
Thus, compound 11 represents a new structural class of tubulin
targeting agents.
Notes and references
1 T. F. Imbert, Biochimie, 1998, 80, 207–222.
2 J. K. Bastos, C. L. Burnadt, N. P. D. Nanayakkara, L. Bryant and
J. D. McChesney, J. Nat. Prod., 1996, 59, 406–408.
3 L. Bohlin and B. Rosen, Drug Discovery Today, 1996, 1, 343–351.
4 Y. J. You, Curr. Pharm. Des., 2005, 11, 1695–1717.
5 M. Gordaliza, M. A. Castro, J. M. M. Corral and A. San
Feliciano, Curr. Pharm. Des., 2000, 6, 1811–1839.
6 M. Lv and H. Xu, Mini-Rev. Med. Chem., 2011, 11, 901–909.
7 M. Gordaliza, M. A. Castro, M. D. Garcia-Gravalos, P. Ruiz,
J. M. M. del Corral and A. San Feliciano, Arch. Pharm.
(Weinheim, Ger.), 1994, 175–179.
Fig. 4 Molecular docking poses (black) of 21 (A) and 11 (B) overlaid
with that of 1 (red).
8 C. F. Brewer, J. D. Loike, S. B. Horwitz, H. Sternlicht and
W. J. Gensler, J. Med. Chem., 1979, 22, 215–221.
9 D. B. Berkowitz, J.-H. Maeng, A. H. Dantzig, R. L. Shepard and
B. H. Norman, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, 9426–9427.
10 S. J. Cho, Y. Kashiwada, K. F. Bastow, Y. C. Cheng and
K.-H. Lee, J. Med. Chem., 1996, 39, 1396–1402.
11 For related pyridazine and indole A,B-ring analogues, see
(a) E. Bertounesque, T. Imbert and C. Monneret, Tetrahedron,
1996, 52, 14235–14246; (b) S. D. Cline, T. L. Macdonald and
N. Osheroff, Biochemistry, 1997, 36, 13095–13101.
12 R. B. J. Ravelli, B. Gigant, P. A. Curmi, I. Jourdain, S. Lachkar,
A. Sobel and M. Knossow, Nature, 2004, 428, 198–202.
13 I. V. Magedov, L. Frolova, M. Manpadi, U. D. Bhoga, H. Tang, N. M.
Evdokimov, O. George, K. H. Georgiou, S. Renner, M. Getlic, T. L.
Kinnibrugh, M. A. Fernandes, S. van Slambrouck, W. F. A. Steelant,
C. B. Shuster, S. Rogelj, V. L. A. van Otterlo and A. Kornienko, J. Med.
Chem., 2011, 54, 4234–4246, and references cited therein.
Fig. 5 Microtubule organization in HeLa cells during interphase
(A–E) and mitosis (F–J). Hela cells were treated for 3 hours with the
indicated compounds at their MTT-related GI50 concentrations (see
Table 1). Following drug treatment, cells were probed for microtubules
(green), centromeres (red) and DNA (blue). Bar, 10 m.
c
10418 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 10416–10418
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012