NH/C-2, C-3, C-3a, and C-7a were observed. These corre-
lations, in combination with the shifts of these proton and
carbon resonances and the quaternary nature of C-3,
demonstrated the presence of a 3,3-disubstituted indolin-
2-one moiety in 1. HMBC correlations of H-40/C-3, C-50,
C-60, and C-500; H2-50/C-30, C-40, and C-60; and H2-60/C-40
and C-50, in combination with the shifts of these proton
and carbon resonances, indicated that the C-3 of the
indolin-2-one moiety and quaternary sp2-hybridized C-500
were linked to one end (C-30) of the trisubstituted double
bond with the two methylene units (CH2-50 and CH2-60) at
the other end. Meanwhile, HMBC correlations from H2-60
to C-3, together with the shifts of these proton and carbon
resonances including C-60 and the coupling patterns of
H-60a and H-60b, revealed that C-3 linked to C-60 through
a sulfur atom, forming an unusual 50,60-dihydrospiro-
[indoline-3,20-thiopyran]-2-one moiety in 1. In addition,
HMBC correlations of H2-1000/C-2000, C-300, and C-3000;
H-2000/C-1000, C-3000, C-4000, and C-300; H-3000/C-2000; H-4000/
C-3000 and C-2000; and OH-2000/C-1000, C-2000, and C-3000 indi-
cated the presence of a 2000-hydroxybut-3000-en-1000-yl unit
connected by the remaining quaternary sp2 hybridized
carbon, C-300. The chemical shifts of C-300 and C-500 in the
aforementioned moieties, along with the molecular compo-
sition and degree of unsaturation of 1, indicated that the two
quaternary carbons must be connected by the two remain-
ing nitrogen atoms and the remaining sulfur atom to
construct a 100,200,400- or 100,300,400-thiadiazole ring. The chem-
ical shifts of C-300 and C-500 were consistent with those
of the corresponding carbons in 1,2,4-thiadiazole deriva-
tives9 but significantly different from those in 1,3,4-
thiadiazole analogues,10 suggesting the presence of a
100,200,400-thiadiazole ring in 1. Therefore, the gross structure of
1was determined to be 30-[300-(2000-hydroxybut-3000-en-1000-yl)-
100,200,400-thiadiazol-500-yl]-50,60-dihydrospiro[indoline-3,20-
thiopyran]-2-one.
Figure 3. Δδ values (δR ꢀ δS, black data in ppm) for 1a-(R)-
MPA and 1a-(S)-MPA.
were identical to those of 1 prior to HPLC separation. This
confirmed that1wasa mixtureofenantiomerswitha 1a/1b
ratio of ∼2:1. The absolute configuration at C-2000 in 1a
was determinedbyMosher’smethod.11 Esterification of 1a
with (R)-(ꢀ)- and (S)-(þ)-R-methoxyphenylacetic acid
(MPA) gave the corresponding derivatives 1a-(R)-MPA
1
and 1a-(S)-MPA. The H NMR data of the diastereo-
1
mers were assigned on the basis of 1Hꢀ H COSY experi-
ments. From the MPA determination rule based on the
Δδ values11 (Figure 3), the configuration of 1a was deter-
mined to be 2000S and that of the enantiomer (1b) was
assigned as 2000R. The absolute configurations at C-3 in 1a
and 1bweredeterminedbycomparison ofthe experimental
ECD spectra with those predicted from quantum mechan-
ical time dependent density functional theory (TDDFT)
calculations.12 In the ECD calculation, the flexible 2000-
hydroxybut-3000-enyl unit was replaced by a methyl group
to simplify the computation since this unit may generate
various conformations but has little effect on the ECD
data.13 A pair of enantiomers (1A and 1B) was proposed
as the model compounds. The theoretically calculated
ECD spectra of 1A and 1B were in good agreement with
the experimental ECD spectra of 1a and 1b (Figure 4),
respectively. This indicated that 1a and 1b had the
3S- and 3R-configurations, respectively. Therefore, com-
pounds 1a and 1b were determined as (ꢀ)-(2000S,3S)- and
(þ)-(2000R,3R)-30-{300-[2000-hydroxybut-3000-en-1000-yl]-100,200,400-
thiadiazol-500-yl}-50,60-dihydrospiro[indoline-3,20- thiopyran]-
2-one, respectively.14
Since the stereoisomers of the proposed biosynthetic
precursors, epiprogoitrin and progoitrin, were presented
in I. indigotica in a 2:1 ratio,6b it was suspected that 1 was
a mixture of two enantiomers in unequal amounts, which
resulted in the optical activity. This was supported by
HPLC analysis of 1 on an analytical chiral column, show-
ing two peaks with an integration of about 2:1 ratio. Sub-
sequent separation of 1 yielded 1a {[R]2D0 ꢀ29.1 (c 0.15,
MeOH)} and 1b {[R]2D0 þ28.9 (c 0.07, MeOH)}, which had
opposite specific rotations and ECD data, but NMR data
Compounds 1a and 1b are characterized by the 50,60-
dihydrospiro[indoline-3,20-thiopyran]-2-one and 300-(2000-
hydroxybut-3000-en-1000-yl)-100,200,400-thiadiazole moieties,
(9) (a) Cameron, T. S.; Decken, A.; Fang, M.; Parsons, S.; Passmore,
J.; Wood, D. J. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1801. (b) Ren, F.; Den, G.; Wang,
H.; Luan, L.; Meng, Q.; Xu, Q.; Xu, H.; Xu, X.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, B.; Li,
C.; Guo, T.; Yang, J.; Zhao, W.; Zhao, Y.; Jia, Q.; Lu, H.; Xiang, J.;
Elliott, J. D.; Lin, X. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 4286.
(10) Lebrini, M.; Bentiss, F.; Lagrenee, M. J. Heterocycl. Chem.
2005, 42, 991.
(11) Seco, J. M.; Quinoa, E.; Riguera, R. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 17.
(12) (a) Li, X.-C.; Ferreira, D.; Ding, Y.-Q. Curr. Org. Chem. 2010,
14, 1678. (b) Chianese, G.; Fattorusso, E.; Aiyelaagbe, O. O.; Luciano,
P.; Schroder, H. C.; Muller, W. E. G.; Taglialatela-Scafati, O. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 316.
(13) Berova, N.; Di Bari, L.; Pescitelli, G. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2007, 36, 914.
(14) For enantiomeric natural products, see: Finefield, J. M.; Sherman,
D. H.; Kreitman, M.; Williams, R. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51,
4802.
1
Figure 2. 1Hꢀ H COSY (thick lines) and main HMBC (red
arrows, from proton to carbon) correlations for 1.
5670
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 22, 2012