Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
(2) For recent reviews of PK-type reactions, see: (a) Perez-Castells, J.
Top. Organomet. Chem. 2006, 19, 207. (b) Lee, H.-W.; Kwong, F.-Y. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 789. (c) Shibata, T. Sci. Synth. 2011, 3, 125 and
references cited therein.
(3) (a) Baik, M.-H.; Baum, E. W.; Burland, M. C.; Evans, P. A. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 1602. (b) Wang, H.; Sawyer, J. R.; Evans, P. A.;
Baik, M.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 342. (c) Pitcock, W. H., Jr.;
Lord, R. L.; Baik, M.-H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 5821. (d) Baik, M.-
H.; Mazumder, S.; Ricci, P.; Sawyer, J. R.; Song, Y.-G.; Wang, H.; Evans,
P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 7621.
(4) (a) Yu, Z.-X.; Wender, P. A.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004,
126, 9154. (b) Wang, Y.; Wang, J.; Su, J.; Huang, F.; Jiao, L.; Liang, Y.;
Yang, D.; Zhang, S.; Wender, P. A.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
10060. (c) Houk, K. N.; Cheong, P. H.-Y. Nature 2008, 455, 309. (d) Yu,
Z.-X.; Cheong, P. H.-Y.; Liu, P.; Legault, C. Y.; Wender, P. A.; Houk, K.
N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 2378. (e) Huang, F.; Yao, Z.-K.; Wang,
Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, Z.-X. Chem.Asian J. 2010, 5, 1555. (f) Liu,
P.; Sirois, L. E.; Cheong, P. H.-Y.; Yu, Z.-X.; Hartung, I. V.; Rieck, H.;
Wender, P. A.; Houk, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 10127. (g) Jiao,
L.; Lin, M.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 447. (h) Lin, M.; Li, F.;
Jiao, L.; Yu, Z.-X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 1690.
process. Interestingly, there are relatively few examples of enantio-
selective reactions involving ACPs,15 which is consistent with the
theoretical preference for a monodentate phosphine ligand.
Nevertheless, analysis of our computed mechanism coupled with
the insight gained from the experimental results suggested that
the enantiodetermining step, v → vi, may be able to tolerate a
bidentate ligand. Gratifyingly, treatment of ACP 1a with the catalyst
derived from Rh(COD)2OTf and the chiral P,N-ligand16,17 9 in
the presence of CO and tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA)18
furnished cis-fused bicyclohexenone ent-3a in 75% yield with 89%
enantiomeric excess (eq 2). This represents the first highly enantio-
selective reaction involving an ACP and provides an important
proof-of-principle for related transformations that contain this motif.
(5) Evans, P. A.; Inglesby, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 12838.
(6) For related metal-catalyzed [3 + 2 + 1] carbocyclization reactions,
see: (a) Koga, Y.; Narasaka, K. Chem. Lett. 1999, 705. (b) Jiao, L.; Lin,
M.; Zhuo, L.-G.; Yu, Z.-X. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2528. (c) Li, C.; Zhang,
H.; Feng, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, J. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3082.
(7) See the Supporting Information (SI) for more details and
additional comments on other mechanistic pathways probed.
(8) For examples of Pd/Ni-catalyzed carbocyclizations with ACPs, see:
(a) Suzuki, T.; Fujimoto, H. Inorg. Chem. 2000, 39, 1113. (b) Gulías, M.;
In conclusion, we have developed a novel Rh-catalyzed [3 + 2 + 1]
carbocyclization reaction using theory to predict the catalyst
requirements and the critical steps in the catalytic cycle that
impact enantio- and diastereoselectivity. The mechanistic under-
standing garnered from this study provided a robust hypothesis for
the subsequent experimental studies. For example, the theoretical
analysis predicted the optimal metal complex, which provided
important insight into the precatalyst requirements for reactions
involving CO. Moreover, the theoretical studies indicated that
the stereodetermining steps occur at different points in the
catalytic cycle, permitting enantio- and diastereoselective variants
to be developed. Additional studies provided evidence for the
intermediacy of a fluxional π-allylrhodium complex, permitting
substitution at the β-position of the bicyclohexenone.
García, R.; Delgado, A.; Castedo, L.; Mascarenas, J. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
̃
2006, 128, 384. (c) Saya, L.; Bhargava, G.; Navarro, M. A.; Gulías, M.;
Lop
Ed. 2010, 49, 9886. (d) Gulías, M.; Lop
Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 495.
́
ez, F.; Fernandez, I.; Castedo, L.; Mascarenas, J. L. Angew. Chem., Int.
́
̃
́
ez, F.; Mascarenas, J. L. Pure
̃
(9) (a) Jeong, N.; Lee, S.; Sung, B. K. Organometallics 1998, 17, 3642.
(b) Jeong, N.; Sung, B. K.; Choi, Y. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6771.
(10) See the SI for computational details.
(11) (a) Montero-Campillo, M. M.; Rodriguez-Otero, J.; Cabaleiro-
Lago, E. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 2423. (b) Dachs, A.; Torrent, A.;
̀
ASSOCIATED CONTENT
* Supporting Information
■
Roglans, A.; Parella, T.; Osuna, S.; Sola, M. Chem.Eur. J. 2009, 15,
S
̀
5289. (c) Dachs, A.; Osuna, S.; Roglans, A.; Sola, M. Organometallics
Computational details and results, experimental procedures,
characterization data, and CIF files for 3a, 3h, and ent-3a. This
material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.
2010, 29, 562. (d) Dachs, A.; Roglans, A.; Sola,
30, 3151.
̀
M. Organometallics 2011,
(12) For examples of metal−TMM complexes, see: (a) Noyori, R.;
Yamakawa, M.; Takaya, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1978, 19, 4823. (b) Jones,
M. D.; Kemmitt, R. D. W.; Platt, A. W. G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.
1986, 1411. (c) Herberich, G. E.; Spaniol, T. P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton
Trans. 1993, 2471. (d) McNeill, K.; Andersen, R. A.; Bergman, R. G. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11244.
(13) See the SI for the mechanism of the isomerization of 2 to 3.
(14) (a) Yamamoto, Y.; Arakawa, T.; Ogawa, R.; Itoh, K. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2003, 125, 12143. (b) Orian, L.; van Stralen, J. N. P.; Bickelhaupt, F.
M. Organometallics 2007, 26, 3816.
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Corresponding Author
■
Notes
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
(15) Gulías, M.; Duran
Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11026.
́
, J.; Lopez, F.; Castedo, L.; Mascarenas, J. L. J.
́
̃
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
■
We thank the EPSRC (EP/G010250) and NSF (CHE-0645381
and CHE-1001589) for financial support, the Royal Society for a
Wolfson Research Merit Award (P.A.E.), the Research
Corporation for a Cottrell Scholarship and Scialog Award (M.-H.B.),
the WCU Program of the National Research Foundation of
Korea (M.-H.B.), and the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry
Service Centre (Swansea, U.K.) for HR-MS analyses.
(16) For the first preparation of this class of ligands, see: (a) Richards,
C. J.; Damalidis, T.; Hibbs, D. E.; Hursthouse, M. B. Synlett 1995, 74.
(b) Sammakia, T.; Latham, H. A.; Schaad, D. R. J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60,
10. (c) Nishibayashi, Y.; Uemura, S. Synlett 1995, 79.
(17) Although the enantioselectivity was excellent for this particular
example, other substrates provided slightly lower enantioselectivities
(e.g., 80% ee for 3e and 3f).
(18) The presence of TMEDA is important for catalyst recovery, since
we observed significantly reduced turnover frequency in its absence.
REFERENCES
■
(1) For recent reviews of higher-order carbocyclization reactions, see:
(a) Inglesby, P. A.; Evans, P. A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 2791.
(b) Aubert, C.; Malacria, M.; Ollivier, C. Sci. Synth. 2011, 3, 145 and
references cited therein.
NOTE ADDED AFTER ASAP PUBLICATION
Revised SI files were posted and refs 8 and 12 were revised on
December 13, 2012.
■
20572
dx.doi.org/10.1021/ja305467x | J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 20569−20572