B. H. Heasley et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 6811–6816
6815
under the vigorous reaction conditions. Alkylations of 9 with the
enantiomeric forms of N-Boc- -H-prolinol tosylate provided ca.
efficacy. Derivatives bearing the (R)-prolinol stereochemical con-
figuration (15c–f) were more orally efficacious than the represen-
tative (S)-prolinol analog 15a, reducing kidney fungal burden by ca.
two logarithmic units when dosed orally at 25 mg/kg (mpk). Com-
a
50% yields10,12 of C3 O-alkylated products and these intermediates
were further elaborated to final compounds 15a–d.10 In the penul-
timate step of the synthesis of 15f, global deprotection of the acid-
labile side chain N-Boc group and C18 para-methoxybenzyl ester
was accomplished in a single operation (14?15e). Finally, the
somewhat hindered pyrrolidine 15e could be N-monomethylated
in acceptable yield12 under standard reductive alkylation condi-
tions to complete the partial synthesis of derivative 15f. The semi-
synthetic preparation of 15f from enfumafungin depicted in
Schemes 1–3 is representative of the general methodologies used
to access other final compounds described in this work.10
pound 15e, the a-methyl (R)-prolinol derivative, exhibited notable
oral efficacy in the TOKA mouse model (À2.16 log unit reduction at
25 mpk/po) but was considerably less active in this assay than lead
compound 3. The demonstrated oral efficacy of compounds 3, 15e
and 15f is consistent with the previously asserted9c notion that
incorporation of a quaternary stereocenter adjacent to the basic
amine of the C3 enfumafungin side chain confers improved oral
activity in the TOKA mouse model of disseminated candidiasis.9,10
Based upon the promising oral efficacy observed in the pyrroli-
dine series, three compounds were advanced to murine pharmaco-
kinetic profiling studies (Table 2).10 Unfortunately, following oral
administration of compounds 15c–e in mice, poor plasma exposure
was indicated by relatively low dose-normalized area under curve
(nAUC) values in conjunction with high rates of clearance (13–19
L/h). Area under the curve values for 15c–e were at least 10-fold
less than the nAUC determined for lead compound 3 after identical
po dosing in mice. Compound 3 was also significantly more bio-
available than derivatives from the pyrrolidine series (F = 42% for
3 vs 23% for 15d). In spite of potent in vitro inhibitory properties
against fungal b-(1,3)-glucan synthase, the moderate TOKA activity
and low plasma exposure (for 15c–e) short-circuited further devel-
opment of C3-aminoether pyrrolidine enfumafungin derivatives as
orally bioavailable antifungal agents. Pyrrolidine systems are
known to undergo bioactivation involving hydroxylation at C5
(pyrrolidine numbering), leading to ring-opening of the resultant
N,O-hemiaminal.15 This metabolic process may be more detrimen-
tal to plasma exposure than oxidative N-demethylation in the case
of 3.
Compounds 15a–f were evaluated as direct inhibitors of
b-(1,3)-glucan synthase, the essential fungal enzyme that forms
b-(1,3)-glucan fibrils from UDP-glucose. In brief, the in vitro assay
for inhibition of b-(1,3)-glucan synthase from Candida albicans
quantifies the incorporation of radioactivity from UDP-[3H]-glu-
cose into precipitated glucan.10,13 The IC50 of enfumafungin (1) in
the glucan synthase inhibition assay is approximately 50 ng/mL,
a value comparable to the MIC (200 ng/mL) against Candida albi-
cans.7,8 Semisynthetic enfumafungin derivatives 15a–f are potent
inhibitors of fungal cell wall glucan assembly (Table 1). The most
potent in vitro inhibitors of glucan synthase from this series are
compounds 15e and 15f, each bearing a quaternary stereocenter
adjacent to the basic amine of the pyrrolidine in the C3-aminoether
side chain. The IC50 potencies of 15e and 15f (4.0 and 6.4 ng/mL,
respectively) in this assay are within an order of magnitude of
the IC50 of the lead compound (3). Compounds 15a-d, lacking the
side chain quaternary carbon substitution, lose about one log order
of potency against glucan synthase relative to 3.
Antifungal susceptibility testing was conducted in order to
determine minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC values) for
test compounds as a measurement of antifungal activity. Deriva-
tives 15a–f exhibited good to moderate MIC values against C. albi-
cans (Table 1) that were generally comparable in potency to their
corresponding IC50 values in the in vitro glucan synthase inhibition
assay. As a point of reference, the MIC of enfumafungin (1) against
C. albicans is 200 ng/mL.7,8 Two of the compounds tested, 15e and
15f, displayed antifungal activity that was similar to that of 1.
However, the MIC values of these two derivatives (125 ng/mL for
each) against C. albicans were less potent than that of the lead com-
pound (3) by about one order of magnitude. In addition, the
remaining analogs from this set (15a–d) were significantly less po-
tent than 3. Given the general loss of in vitro antifungal activity in
the ‘tethered’ pyrrolidine series relative to 3, it is evident that sub-
tle structural modifications of the C3-aminoether side chain of
enfumafungin derivatives can significantly modulate antifungal
potency. In that respect, the C3 side chain of compound 3 is consid-
ered a highly desirable structural feature that contributes to potent
in vitro fungicidal properties in the enfumafungin series.
In vivo anti-Candida activity and oral efficacy of the experimen-
tal enfumafungin derivatives were evaluated using the target or-
gan kidney assay (TOKA) mouse model of disseminated
candidiasis.10,14 In brief, a disseminated Candida infection is in-
duced in mice by intravenous inoculation of C. albicans into the lat-
eral tail vein. Test compounds are then administered (ip or po) bid
for 2 days and the reduction in kidney fungal burden compared to
sham-treated control groups is determined. TOKA-active com-
pounds generally lower the fungal colony forming units (CFU)
per gram of kidney by 1–2 logarithmic units compared to sham-
treated controls.10 Enfumafungin derivatives 15a and 15c–f were
shown to be efficacious in the mouse model of disseminated can-
didiasis when delivered orally (Table 2). In the pyrrolidine series,
the configuration of the stereogenic carbon position in the C3-
aminoether side chain influenced the magnitude of observed oral
References and notes
1. Heasley, B. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 8474. and references cited
therein.
2. (a) Odds, F. C.; Brown, A. J. P.; Gow, N. A. R. Trends Microbiol. 2003, 11, 272; (b)
Ghannoum, M. A.; Rice, L. B. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 1999, 12, 501.
3. (a) Brown, E. D.; Wright, G. D. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 759; (b) Vicente, M. F.;
Basilio, A.; Cabello, A.; Pelaez, F. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2003, 9, 15; (c) http://
4. (a) Bouffard, F. A.; Zambias, R. A.; Dropinski, J. F.; Balkovec, J. M.; Hammond, M.
L.; Abruzzo, G. K.; Bartizal, K. F.; Marrinan, J. A.; Kurtz, M. B.; McFadden, D. C.;
Nollstadt, K. H.; Powles, M. A.; Schmatz, D. M. J. Med. Chem. 1994, 37, 222; (b)
Balkovec, J. M.; Black, R. M.; Hammond, M. L.; Heck, J. V.; Zambias, R. A.;
Abruzzo, G.; Bartizal, K.; Kropp, H.; Trainor, C.; Schwartz, R. E.; McFadden, D. C.;
Nollstadt, K. H.; Pittaressi, L. A.; Powles, M. A.; Schmatz, D. M. J. Med. Chem.
1992, 35, 194.
5. Leonard, W. R.; Belyk, K. M.; Conlon, D. A.; Bender, D. R.; DiMichele, L. M.; Liu, J.;
Hughes, D. L. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 2335.
6. The %F of caspofungin acetate in mice is approximately 0.3–1%: Abruzzo, G. K.;
Flattery, A. M.; Gill, C. J.; Kong, L.; Smith, J. G.; Pikounis, V. B.; Balkovec, J. M.;
Bouffard, F. A.; Dropinski, J. F.; Rosen, H.; Kropp, H.; Bartizal, K. Antimicrob.
Agents Chemother. 1997, 41, 2333.
7. Onishi, J.; Meinz, M.; Thompson, J.; Curotto, J.; Dreikorn, S.; Rosenbach, M.;
Douglas, C.; Abruzzo, G.; Flattery, A.; Kong, L.; Cabello, A.; Vicente, F.; Pelaez, F.;
Diez, M. T.; Martin, I.; Bills, G.; Giacobbe, R.; Dombrowski, A.; Schwartz, R.;
Morris, S.; Harris, G.; Tsipouras, A.; Wilson, K.; Kurtz, M. B. Antimicrob. Agents
Chemother. 2000, 44, 368.
8. Schwartz, R. E.; Smith, S. K.; Onishi, J. C.; Meinz, M.; Kurtz, M.; Giacobbe, R. A.;
Wilson, K. E.; Liesch, J.; Zink, D.; Horn, W.; Morris, S.; Cabello, A.; Vicente, F. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4882.
9. (a) Balkovec, J. M., Bouffard, F. A., Tse, B., Dropinski, J., Meng, D., Greenlee, M. L.,
Peel, M. R., Fan, W., Mamai, A., Liu, H., Li, K. PCT International Patent
Application, WO 2007127012 A1, 2007.; (b) Balkovec, J. M., Siliphaivanh, P.,
Bouffard, F. A., Peel, M. R., Fan, W., Mamai, A., Dimick Gray, S. M. PCT
International Patent Application, WO 2009045311 A1, 2009.; (c) Peel, M. R.,
Mamai, A., Fan, W., Dimick-Gray, S., Hong, J., Orr, M. D., Balkovec, J. M.,
Greenlee, M. L., Waddell, S., Abruzzo, G. Flattery, A., Giacobbe, R., Gill, C., Hsu,
M.-J., Racine, F., Liberator, P., Nielsen Kahn, J. Poster F1–848 ICAAC 2010.
10. (a) Greenlee, M. L., Wilkening, R., Apgar, J., Sperbeck, D., Wildonger, K. J., Meng,
D., Parker, D. L., Pacofsky, G. J., Heasley, B. H., Mamai, A., Nelson, K. PCT
International Patent Application, WO 2010019204 A1, 2010.; (b) Wilkening, R.,
Apgar, J., Meng, D., Parker, D. L., Greenlee, M. L., Sperbeck, D., Wildonger, K. J.,