Scheme 1. Synthesis of the Key Building Block (1)
Figure 1. Modular caged compounds.
with free phosphate in the presence of other functional
groups, and (3) whether the synthesized phosphate esters
can retain their photochemical properties as caged phos-
phates. To address the first question, the key intermediate
1 was reacted with amine-containing molecules (Figure 2).
The NHS ester moiety of 1 reacted quantitatively with a
propargyl amine to produce the corresponding propargyl
amide. Because the tosylhydrazone moiety of the amide
was partly transformed into a diazomethyl group, the
crude product was subjected to reaction with triethyl-
amine to give the desired Bhc-diazo derivative propargyl-
Bhc-diazo (4) in 93% isolated yield. The product is an
unexpectedly stable diazomethane derivative and can be
stored at ambient temperature for more than a year. After
being used in caging nucleotides, the propargyl moiety in 4
can be a chemical handle for additional modification using
Cu-catalyzed Huisgen [3 þ 2] cyclization.13
would be expanded. We report a modular approach to
the synthesis of caged nucleotides having additional
functionality.
To synthesize caged nucleotides, photoremovable pro-
tecting groups can be used either as protecting groups of
functional groups in riboses,9 phosphates,4,7,10 and nucleo-
bases11 or as photocleavable linkers of hairpin-like struc-
tures.12 Because free phosphates are known to react with
diazomethane derivatives to give the corresponding esters,
the synthetic route of phosphate protection is expected to
be simpler and to provide easier application for preparing
caged compounds having complex structures. Therefore,
we designed new precursor molecules of modular caged
nucleotides in which an additional functional unit was in-
stalled easily. The key compound (1) comprises three com-
ponents: an amine reactive NHS ester moiety, a photo-
active Bhc group, and tosylhydrazone as a precursor of a
diazomethyl moiety (Figure 1). The precursor molecule
NHS-Bhc-hydrazone (1) was synthesized from the known
alcohol Bhc-CH2OH (2)5 in five steps (Scheme 1).
The following questions are addressed by this study: (1)
which functional units can be added to precursor molecule
1, (2) whether the precursor molecule can react selectively
Using the same reaction conditions, we synthesized
other Bhc-diazo derivatives from amine-containing com-
pounds including pentylamine-biotin (Bio-Bhc-diazo 5) as
a ligand of a specific protein and hydrophobic octylamine
(Oct-Bhc-diazo 6). An Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) peptide, a
targeting moiety to cancer cells,14 was also introduced into
1 to yield the corresponding tosylhydrazone 7. As far as
chemical stability is concerned, we observed decomposi-
tion of 7 during storage as a DMF solution. The decom-
posed products included the 4-hydroxymethyl coumarin
derivative 8, which was generated from hydrolysis of the
4-formyloxymethyl coumarin 9. A possible explanation of
this is the following: during storage, a small amount of
the DMF molecules are hydrolyzed to produce diethyl-
amine and formic acid, diethylamine drives the formation
of the 4-diazomethyl derivative (RGD-Bhc-diazo) from 7,
and the resulting RGD-Bhc-diazo reacts with formic acid
to produce the formic acid ester 9. Those results raised the
next question of whether the coumarinyl diazomethanes
react selectively with phosphates in the presence of carbox-
ylates, amines, and alcohols: functional groups that are
common among biologically important molecules.
(8) Suzuki, A. Z.; Watanabe, T.; Kawamoto, M.; Nishiyama, K.;
Yamashita, H.; Ishii, M.; Iwamura, M.; Furuta, T. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4867.
(9) (a) Chaulk, S. G.; MacMillan, A. M. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998, 26,
3173. (b) Chaulk, S. G.; MacMillan, A. M. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2, 1052.
(10) (a) Furuta, T.; Momotake, A.; Sugimoto, M.; Hatayama, M.;
Torigai, H.; Iwamura, M. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1996, 228, 193.
(b) Furuta, T.; Iwamura, M. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 291, 50. (c) Monroe,
W. T.; McQuain, M. M.; Chang, M. S.; Alexander, J. S.; Haselton, F. R.
J. Biol. Chem. 1999, 274, 20895. (d) Shah, S.; Rangarajan, S.; Friedman,
S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 1328. (e) Nguyen, Q. N.; Chavli,
R. V.; Marques, J. T.; Conrad, P. G., Jr.; Wang, D.; He, W.; Belisle,
B. E.; Zhang, A.; Pastor, L. M.; Witney, F. R.; Morris, M.; Heitz, F.;
Divita, G.; Williams, B. R.; McMaster, G. K. Biochim. Biophys. Acta
2006, 1758, 394. (f) Casey, J. P.; Blidner, R. A.; Monroe, W. T. Mol.
Pharmaceutics 2009, 6, 669. (g) Shah, S.; Jain, P. K.; Kala, A.;
Karunakaran, D.; Friedman, S. H. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 37, 4508.
(11) (a) Alvarez, K.; Vasseur, J. J.; Beltran, T.; Imbach, J. L. J. Org.
Chem. 1999, 64, 6319. (b) Krock, L.; Heckel, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 471. (c) Hobertner, C.; Silverman, S. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2005, 44, 7305. (d) Lusic, H.; Young, D. D.; Lively, M. O.; Deiters Org.
Lett. 2007, 9, 1903. (e) Mikat, V.; Heckel, A. RNA 2007, 13, 2341. (f)
Kuzuya, A.; Okada, F.; Komiyama, M. Bioconjugate Chem. 2009, 20,
6319. (g) Deiters, A.; Garner, R. A.; Lusic, H.; Govan, J. M.; Dush, M.;
Nascone-Yoder, N. M.; Yoder, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132,
15644. (h) Young, D. D.; Lively, M. O.; Deiters, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2010, 132, 6183. (i) Govan, J. M.; Uprety, R.; Hemphill, J.; Lively,
M. O.; Deiters, A. ACS Chem. Biol. 2012, 7, 1247.
Consequently, two coumarinyl diazomethane deriva-
tives 4 and 6 were chosen to address the second question.
Most diazomethane derivatives are known to react with
carboxylic acids as well as phosphates withthe evolution of
nitrogen. As expected, the reaction of 4 with diethyl
phosphate produced the corresponding ester 10. However,
(12) (a) Shestopalov, I. A.; Sinha, S.; Chen, J. K. Nat. Chem. Biol.
2007, 3, 650. (b) Tang, X.; Maegawa, S.; Weinberg, E. S.; Dmochowski,
I. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 11000. (c) Tang, X.; Swaminathan, J.;
Gewirtz, A. M.; Dmochowski, I. J. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36, 559. (d)
Ouyang, X.; Shestopalov, I. A.; Sinha, S.; Zheng, G.; Pitt, C. L.; Li,
W.-H.; Olson, A. J.; Chen, J. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13255.
(13) (a) Tornoe, C. W.; Christensen, C.; Meldal, M. J. Org. Chem.
2002, 67, 3057. (b) Rostovtsev, V. V.; Green, L. G.; Fokin, V. V.;
Sharpless, B. K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2596. (c) El-Sagheer,
A. H.; Brown, T. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1388.
(14) Arap, W.; Pasqualini, R.; Ruoslahti, E. Science 1998, 279, 377.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 24, 2012
6183