more generally of noncyclic R-amino-β-keto esters with
Ru(II) catalysts afforded the corresponding β-hydroxy
esters with excellent diastereoisomeric and enantiomeric
excesses.6 The stereochemical course of the hydrogenation
reaction is highly dependent on the nature of the protected
amino groups. In the current paradigm, hydrogenation of
the N-acyl-protected R-amido-β-keto esters yields the syn
diastereomer,7 whereas the hydrochloride salt of R-amino-
β-keto esters afforded the anti diastereomer.8 However,
up to now, the only example of an efficient DKR of an
R-acetamido-β-keto phosphonates with Ru-BINAP sys-
tem afforded the corresponding syn R-acetamido-β-hydroxy
phosphonates was reported by Noyori et al. in 1995.9 There-
fore, asymmetric hydrogenation of R-amido-β-keto phos-
phonates is still a challenging work.
The asymmetric hydrogenation was carried out with 1 mol %
of [RuCl(benzene)(S)-SunPhos]Cl under 10 bar of H2 at
50 °C in MeOH for 24 h with dimethyl (1-acetamido-
2-oxo-2-phenylethyl)phosphonate (1a) as the standard
substrate. We obtained full conversions and excellent
diastereoisomeric and enantiomeric excesses of the desired
product 2a11 (Table 1, entry 1, syn/anti 97:3, ee 98.0%).
Because subtle changes in geometric, steric, and/or elec-
tronic properties of chiral ligands can lead to dramatic
variations of reactivity and stereselectivity,12 (S)-Tol-Sun-
Phos and two commercially available chiral bidentate
ligands, (S)-SegPhos and (S)-MeO-Biphep, were also
tested under the same reaction conditions (Figure 2). They
showed lower activity, and the diastereo- and enantios-
electivities varied to some extent. As illustrated in Table 1,
(R)-Tol-SunPhos (entry 2, syn/anti 94:6, ee 99.9%),
(S)-SegPhos (entry 3, syn/anti 89:11, ee 95.7%), and
(S)-Meo-Biphep (entry 4, syn/anti 89:11, ee 96.7%) were
inferior to (S)-SunPhos. On the basis of the above results,
(S)-SunPhos was the ligand of choice.
Results of the optimization of solvents, hydrogen pres-
sure, andreactiontemperaturesare summarizedin Table1.
Solvent is important for the catalytic efficiency and dia-
stereoisomeric and enantiomeric excesses of the asym-
metric hydrogenation reaction (Table 1, entries 1, 5À8).
Protic solvents resulted in high catalytic activities and
diastereoisomeric and enantiomeric excesses, providing
Figure 1. Biologically active β-hydroxy-R-amino phosphonates.
Our group has designed some atropisomeric C2-symmetric
biaryl biphosphine-SunPhos ligands and explored their
applications in asymmetric hydrogenation of functiona-
lized ketones.10 In this paper, we disclose a general and
highly diastereo- and enantioselective hydrogenation reac-
tion of R-amido-β-keto phosphonates.
The catalyst was prepared from [RuCl2(benzene)]2 and
(S)-SunPhos (Figure 2) by refluxing them in degassed
dichloromethane/ethanol (v/v = 1:1) for 1.5 h, and
then the solvent was removed under reduced pressure.10a
Figure 2. Structures of chiral bidentate ligands.
(6) (a) Mashima, K.; Matsumura, Y.; Kusano, K.; Kumobayashi,
H.; Sayo, N.; Hori, Y.; Ishizaki, T.; Akutagawa, S.; Takaya, H. Chem
Commun. 1991, 609–610. (b) Coulon, E.; Andrade, M. C. C. d.;
^
Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Genet, J.-P. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39,
complete conversions of 1a to 2a with good to excellent
syn/anti ratios ranging from 95:5 to 97:3 and ee’s up to
98.2%. Aprotic solvents such as dichloromethane or THF
gave 2a with up to 99.0% ee but lower diastereoselectivities
(Table 1, entries 7 and 8). The results depicted in Table 1
showed that the efficiency and diastereoisomeric and enan-
tiomeric excesses of the hydrogenation were strongly depen-
dent on the temperature (Table 1, entries 1 and 9À11).13
Lower reaction temperature remarkably decreased the reac-
tion rate and diastereoisomeric and enantiomeric excesses,
while higher reaction temperature slightly decreased
6467–6470. (c) Makino, K.; Hiroki, Y.; Hamada, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2005, 127, 5784–5785. (d) Makino, K.; Iwasaki, M.; Hamada, Y. Org.
Lett. 2006, 8, 4573–4576.
(7) Lei, A.; Wu, S.; He, M.; Zhang, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126,
1626–1627.
(8) (a) Mordant, C.; Dunkelmann, P.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.;
^
Genet, J.-P. Chem. Commun. 2004, 1296–1297. (b) Makino, K.; Goto,
T.; Hiroli, Y.; Hamada., Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 882–884. (c)
^
Mordant, C.; Dunkelmann, P.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Genet.,
J.-P. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 3017–3026. (d) Makino, K.; Goto, T.;
Hiroki, Y.; Hamada, Y. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2008, 19, 2816–2828.
(9) Kitamura, M.; Tokunaga, M.; Pham, T.; Lubell, W. D.; Noyori,
R. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 5769–5772.
(10) (a) Sun, Y.; Wan, X.; Guo, M.; Wang, D.; Dong, X.; Pan, Y.;
Zhang, Z. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2004, 15, 2185–2188. (b) Sun, Y.;
Wan, X.; Wang, J.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, H.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, Z. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 5425–5427. (c) Wan, X.; Meng, Q.; Zhang, H.; Sun, Y.; Fan, W.;
Zhang, Z. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5613–5616. (d) Sun, X.; Zhou, L.; Li, W.;
Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 1143–1146. (e) Meng, Q.; Sun, Y.;
(11) Absolute configurations of 2a and 2l were assigned as (1S,2S) on
the basis of their optical rotation and 31P NMR; see ref 9.
(12) (a) Zhang, Z.; Qian, H.; Longmire, J.; Zhang, X. J. Org. Chem.
2000, 65, 6223–6226. (b) Saito, T.; Yokozawa, T.; Ishizaki, T.; Moroi,
T.; Sayo, N.; Miura, T.; Kumobayashi, H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2001, 343,
264–267. (c) Wu, S.; Wang, W.; Tang, W.; Lin, M.; Zhang, X. Org. Lett.
2002, 4, 4495–4497. (d) Kakei, H.; Nemoto, T.; Ohshima, T.; Shibasaki,
M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 317–320.
^
Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Genet, J. P.; Zhang, Z. J. Org. Chem. 2008,
73, 3842–3847;. (f) Li, W.; Ma, X.; Fan, W.; Tao, X.; Li, X.; Xie, X.;
Zhang, Z. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3876–3879. (g) Fan, W.; Li, W.; Ma, X.;
Tao, X.; Li, X.; Yao, Y.; Xie, X.; Zhang, Z. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
4247–4249. (h) Ma, X.; Li, W.; Li, X.; Tao, X.; Fan, W.; Xie, X.; Ayad,
T.; Ratovelomanana-Vidal, V.; Zhang, Z. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48,
5352–5354.
(13) Tsutsumi, K.; Katayama, T.; Utsumi, N.; Murata, K.; Arai, N.;
Kurono, N.; Ohkuma, T. Org. Process Res. Dev. 2009, 13, 625–628.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX