J. Jayabharathi et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 101 (2013) 249–253
253
Fig. 6. HOMO–LUMO molecular orbitals pictures of FPTIP.
Natural Bond Orbital (NBO) analysis
Conclusions
NBO analysis [16] have been performed for FPTIP at the DFT/
B3LYP/6-31++G (d,p) level in order to elucidate the intramolecular,
charge transfer within the molecule and the results have been tab-
ulated in Table 3. Several donor–acceptor interactions have been
observed in FPTIP and among the strongly occupied NBOs, the most
The observed emission wavelength reveals that the existence of
twist drops the fluorescence quantum yield which indicate the
a
importance of non-coplanarity between the imidazole and the aryl
ring at C(2). The electron releasing ability or basicity of the solvent,
[Cb or CSB] has a negative value, suggesting that the absorption and
fluorescence bands shift to lower energies with the increasing elec-
tron donating ability of the solvent. The solvatochromic shift
exhibits, characteristic of a large dipole moment and frequently
suggestive of a large hyperpolarizability. The calculated dipolar
and octupolar components supported imidazole derivative is effi-
cient NLO chromophores. The observed positive q2D value for com-
pound (1.342) show that the biii component cannot be zero and it is
dipolar component.
important delocalization sites are in the
pairs (n) of the, fluorine and nitrogen atoms. The
p
system and in the lone
system shows
r
some contribution to the delocalization and the important contri-
butions to the delocalization corresponds to the donor–acceptor
interactions for FPTIP are C1–C2 ? C5–N20, C3–C4 ? C9–C9, C5–
N20 ? C3–C4, C7–C8 ? C10–C12, C10–C12 ? C13–N19, C23–
C24 ? C25–C28,
C26–C30 ? C23–C24,
C32–C34 ? C33–C35,
C36–C38 ? C32–C34, LP1–N21 ? N22–C31, LP3–F44 ? C36–C38.
The charge distribution of FPTIP has been calculated from the
atomic charges by NBO and NLO analyses (Fig. 4). These methods
reveal that among the nitrogen atoms N15, N16 and fluorine atom,
N15 is considered as more basic site. When compared to nitrogen
atoms (N13, N14, N15 and N16), fluorine atoms are less electroneg-
ative [18]. The charge distribution shows that the more negative
charge is concentrated on N15 atom whereas the partial positive
charge resides at hydrogen atoms.
Acknowledgments
One of the authors Prof. J. Jayabharathi is thankful to DST [No.
SR/S1/IC-73/2010], UGC (F. No. 36-21/2008 (SR)) and DRDO (F.
No. NRB-213/MAT/10-11) for providing funds to this research
study. Mr. R. Sathishkumar is thankful to DRDO (F. No. NRB-213/
MAT/10-11) for providing fellowship.
Molecular electrostatic potential map (MEP) and electronic properties
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) maps (Fig. 5) show the
distribution of charges across the surface of a molecule. This dia-
gram is used to understand the reactive behaviour of a molecule,
in that negative regions can be regarded as nucleophilic centres,
whereas the positive regions are potential electrophilic sites. The
MEP map of the imidazole derivative shows that the nitrogen
and fluorine atoms represent the most negative potential region.
The hydrogen atoms bear the positive charge and the predomi-
nance of green region in the MEP surfaces corresponds to a poten-
tial halfway between the two extremes1 red and dark blue colour.
The HOMO orbital acts as an electron donor and the LUMO orbi-
tal that acts as the electron acceptor. The 3D plots of the frontier
orbitals HOMO and LUMO is shown in Fig. 6. In imidazole com-
pound, the HOMO is located on the aldehydic phenyl ring, imidaz-
ole ring and partly on the phenanthroline ring and the LUMO is
located partly on the phenanthroline ring and on the carbon atoms
(C2 and C5) of the imidazole ring. The HOMO ? LUMO transition
implies that intramolecular charge transfer takes place [19] within
the molecule. The energy gap (Eg) of the imidazole derivative has
been calculated from the HOMO and LUMO levels. The energy
gap explains the probable charge transfer (CD) inside the
chromophore.
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found, in
References
[1] J.M. Raimundo, P. Blanchard, N. Gallego-Planas, N. Mercier, I. Ledoux-Rak, R.
Hierle, J. Roncali, J. Org. Chem. 67 (2002) 205–218.
[2] H. Chao, R.H. Li, B.H. Ye, H. Li, X.L. Feng, J.W. Cai, J.Y. Zhou, L.N. Ji, J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Trans. 67 (1999) 3711–3717.
[3] H. Chao, B.H. Ye, Q.L. Zhang, L.N. Ji, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 2 (1999) 338–340.
[4] J.Z. Wu, L. Li, T.X. Zeng, L.N. Ji, Polyhedron 16 (1997) 103–107.
[5] C.R. Moylan, R.D. Miller, R.J. Twieg, K.M. Betterton, V.Y. Lee, T.J. Matray, C.
Nguyen, Chem. Mater. 5 (1993) 1499–1508.
[6] M. Ammamm, P. Bauerle, Org. Biomol. Chem. 3 (2005) 4143–4152.
[7] J. Zyss (Ed.), Molecular Nonlinear Optics, Academic Press, New York, 1994.
[8] T.J. Marks, M.A. Ratner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 34 (1995) 155–173.
[9] A. Hidetomo, Y. Yasuhiko, M. Kazuhiro, Jpn. Patent 1993.
[10] F. Calderazzo, F. Marchetti, G. Pampaloni, V. Passarelli, J. Chem. Soc. Dalton
Trans. (1999) 4389–4396.
[11] M. Yamada, Y. Tanaka, Y. Yoshimoto, S. Kuroda, I. Shimao, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
65 (1992) 1006–1011.
[12] Gaussian 03 program, Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT, 2004.
[13] M.J. Kamlet, R.W. Taft, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 98 (1976) 377–383.
[14] J. Catalan, V. Lopez, P. Perez, J. Fluoresc. 6 (1996) 15–22.
[15] S.F. Tayyari, S. Laleh, Z.M. Tekyeh, M.Z. Tabrizi, Y.A. Wang, H. Rahemi, J. Mol.
Struct. 827 (2007) 176–187.
[16] J. Marshal, Ind. J. Phys. 7213 (1988) 659–661.
[17] D. Steiger, C. Ahlbrandt, R. Glaser, J. Phys. Chem. B 102 (1998) 4257–4260.
[18] G. Wang, F. Lian, Z. Xie, G. Su, L. Wang, X. Jing, F. Wang, Synth. Met. 131 (2002)
1–5.
1
For interpretation of color in Fig. 5, the reader is referred to the web version of
[19] K. Fukui, T. Yonezawa, H. Shingu, J. Chem. Phys. 20 (1952) 722–725.
this article.