354
C. Cai et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 351–354
CF3
CF3
OMe
OMe
O
O
H
N
H
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
H
H
51
52
Figure 2. Enantiopure 51 and 52.
phages by 89%, 100%, 100% and 101% at 0.3, 1, 3 and 10 mpk dose,
respectively (ED50 = 0.1 mpk; EC50 = 22 nM in plasma)(Fig. 3).
In addition to its favorable in vivo efficacy, compound 51 dis-
played excellent pharmacokinetic profiles in higher species (dog
and monkey). In dog PK (10 mpk in 0.5% methocel, po and 2 mpk
in 20% HPbCD, iv), it has moderate systemic clearance (CL:
15.2 mL/min/kg), large volume of distribution (Vdss: 2.3 L/kg), rea-
sonable oral half-life (t1/2: 3.4 h) and good oral exposure (AUC:
12128 h⁄ng/mL). The oral bioavailability (F%) of compound 51
was 100%.
In conclusion, we identified novel 2-aminooctahydrocyclo-pen-
talene-3a-carboxamides as potent CCR2 antagonists. Modifications
in the middle bicycle as well as the left and right hand sides led to
the discovery of a series of promising CCR2 antagonists with excel-
lent in-vivo efficacy, and desirable PK and safety profiles. Further
modifications on the middle bicyclic ring are in progress and will
be reported in due course.
125
100
75
50
25
0
Basal
Acknowledgments
Tg+Vehicle po bid
Tg+1 mg/kTggp+3o mbigd/kg po bid
Tg+10 mg/kg po bid
Tg+0.3 mg/kg po bid
We are grateful to Dr. Christopher Teleha for providing large
quantities of the intermediate 23 and Dr. Derek Beauchamp for
the crystallography analysis of 51. We also thank the ADME/PK,
Secondary Pharmacology and Lead Generation Biology Teams for
their contributions to this work.
Figure 3. In vivo efficacy in thioglycollate induced peritonitis of 51.
substitution with small groups such as F, Cl, OH or a flat substitu-
ent such as CO2NH2 either increased or retained the binding po-
tency in both epimers. Increasing the size of the substitution
(OMe, CF3 and NMe2) resulted in decrease in potency regardless
of the electronic property of the substitution, which indicates the
receptor binding pocket is limited in size. In the cases of 46a and
50a, the significant loss of activity may be caused by repulsive
interaction between the substituent and the naphthyridine ring
leading to a disfavored confirmation.
As a result, the SAR on the left, right and the middle led to sev-
eral compounds with desirable profiles (33, 43, 44a, 45a, 45b, 47a,
48a and 48b). Some of these analogs were further evaluated as po-
tential clinical candidates. For example, compound 33, which was
still a mixture of two diastereomers due to the chirality of the
methoxy-tetrahydropyranyl moiety, was separated with chiral
KromasilÒ AD column (25% isopropanol in ethanol) to give two ma-
jor diastereoisomers 51 and 52 (Fig. 2).11 Both 51 and 52 exhibited
equal binding affinity (53 nM for 51, 61 nM for 52) against the
CCR2 receptor. In CCR2 functional assays, they are potent antago-
nists of MCP-1-induced chemtaxis (22 nM for 51, 24 nM for 52)
and sub-molar antagonists of MCP-1 induced calcium flux efficacy.
Compound 51 has no hERG activity in both the binding assay
References and notes
1. (a) Fernandez, E. J.; Lolis, E. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2002, 42, 469; (b)
Laing, K. J.; Secombes, C. J. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2004, 28, 443.
2. (a) Kinne, R. W.; Brauer, R.; Stuhlmuller, B.; Palombo-kinne, E.; Burmester, G.
Arthritis Res. 2000, 2, 189; (b) Barrera, P.; Blom, A.; van Lent, P. L.; van Bloois, L.;
Beijnen, J. H.; van Rooiken, N.; De Waal Malefijt, M. C.; van de Putte, L. B.; van
den Berg, W. B. Arthritis Rheum. 1951, 2000, 43.
3. Gong, J. H.; Clark-Lewis, I. J. Exp. Med. 1995, 181, 631.
4. (a) Xia, M.; Sui, Z. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2009, 19, 295; for a recent review of
CCR2, see: (b) Hou, C.; Sui, Z. In ‘‘CCR2 Antagonists for the Treatment of Diseases
Associated with Inflammation’’ Anti-Inflammatory Drug Discovery; Levin, J.,
Laufer, S., Eds.; Royal Society of Chemistry, 2012; pp 350–380. and references
therein.
5. During our research process, scientists at Abbott Laboratories reported
octahydropentalene derivatives as chemokine receptor antagonists in
a
patent (George, D. M.; Wang, L.; Li, B.; Ericsson, A. M.; Ansell, G. K. PCT Int.
Appl. WO 2009042193). Although they did not have the compounds with the
same structures as in this paper and neither the specified active
stereochemistry, they shared the same 5/5 fused bicycles.
6. For example, compound 33 (IC50, 76 nM), which was made from intermediate
27, was more potent than its diastereoisomer (IC50, 4070 nM, structure not
shown) made from the other enantiomer of 27.
7. Compound 21 was prepared from (+)-2-azabicyclo[2.2.1]hept-5-ene-3-one
according to the procedure described in: Smith, M. E. B.; Derrien, N.; Lloyd, M.
C.; Taylor, S. J. C.; Chaplin, D. A.; McCague, R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001, 42, 1347.
8. The second Boc group not only prevents the nucleophilic addition of the
nitrogen to the silylated allylic acetate to generate the undesired product, but
also plays an important role in controlling the stereochemistry in favor of the
desired, enantiomer 23.
(>50
It did not inhibit the major isoforms of human CYP enzymes with
an IC50 of >10 M against CYP1A2, 2C19, 2D6, 2C9 and 7.5
against CYP 3A4.
lM) and the functional assay (15.6% @ 3 lM, patch clamp).
l
lM
9. Trost, B. M.; Chan, D. M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1979, 101, 6429.
10. Corey, E. J.; Desai, M. C.; Engler, T. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 10, 4339.
11. The stereochemistry of compound 51 was determined by X-ray
crystallography of the single crystal of its semi-succinate from acetonitrile.
When orally administered in an acute inflammation model (thi-
oglycollate induced peritonitis) in mCCR2 knock-out/hCCR2 knock-
in mice, compound 51 markedly inhibited the infiltrate of macro-