180
R. Umeda et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 179–182
Table 1
Table 2
Reaction of phenylacetaldehyde dimethylacetal (1a) with 1-phenyl-1-butyne (2a)a
Reaction of phenylacetaldehyde dimethylacetal (1a) with various aryl substituted
alkynes 2a
cat.Re
H2O
cat.ReBr(CO)5
OMe
OMe
H2O
R
+
+
OMe
ClCH2CH2Cl
OMe
R
Ar
ClCH2CH2Cl
Ar
1a
2
3
1a
2a
3a
Entry
Ar
R
Yieldb (%)
Entry
1a (mmol)
Catalyst
T (°C)
Yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
C6H5
C6H5
C6H5
C6H5
1-C10H7
2-C10H7
2-CH3C6H4
3-CH3C6H4
4-CH3C6H4
4-CH3C6H4
2-FC6H4
H
CH3
C2H5
3b, 14
3c, 50
3a, 70
3d, 62
3e, 75
3f, 53
3g, 69
3h, 63
3i, 59
3j, 66
3k, 43
3l, 58
3m, 30
3n, 54
3o, 15
3p, 43
3q, 26
1c
2
3
4
5
1.0
1.0
0.50
0.75
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
ReBr(CO)5
ReBr(CO)5
ReBr(CO)5
ReBr(CO)5
ReBr(CO)5
ReBr(CO)5
ReCl(CO)5
Re2(CO)10
Re2O7
80
80
80
80
40
60
80
80
80
80
80
40
73 (70)
42
61
Trace
54
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
n-C3H7
C6H5
6
7
72
23
12
19
8d
9d
10
11
ReCl5
None
0
4-FC6H4
a
4-BrC6H4
2-Thienyl
C6H5
4-CH3C6H4
2-C10H7
Reaction conditions: 1a, 2a (0.50 mmol), Re catalyst (5 mol %), H2O (1.0 mmol),
ClCH2CH2Cl (2.0 mL), 80 °C, 20 h.
GC yield based on 2a. The number in parenthesis shows the isolated yield based
on 2a.
b
4-CH3C6H4
2-C10H7
c
H2O was not added.
Rhenium complex (2.5 mol %) was used.
d
a
Reaction conditions: 1a (1.0 mmol), 2 (0.50 mmol), ReBr(CO)5 (5 mol %), H2O
(1.0 mmol), ClCH2CH2Cl (2.0 mL), 80 °C, 20 h.
b
Isolated yield based on 2.
of 3a was also diminished at lower reaction temperatures (40 and
60 °C) (entries 5 and 6). For the reaction, other rhenium com-
plexes, such as ReCl(CO)5, Re2(CO)10, Re2O7, and ReCl5, are effec-
tive (entries 7–10). A better yield of 3a was obtained using the
rhenium halo pentacarbonyl complexes, ReBr(CO)5 and ReCl(CO)5
(entries 4 and 7). In the absence of the rhenium complex, 3a was
not formed and the starting materials 1a and 2a were recovered
(entry 11).
presence of H2O, some experiments were carried out. When phe-
nylacetaldehyde was allowed to react with 1-phenyl-1-butyne
(2a), 2-ethyl-1-phenylnaphthalene (3a) was formed in 31% yield
without the formation of a regioisomer. Next, in order to clarify
the selectivity of the reaction, we carried out the reaction of 1a
with unsymmetrical diaryl acetylenes (Scheme 1). When phenyl-
acetaldehyde dimethyl acetal (1a) was treated with 1-(4-methyl-
phenyl)- and 1-(4-tert-butylphenyl)-2-phenyl acetylenes, 2r and
2s, the 1,2-diaryl substituted naphthalenes 3r,s were predomi-
nantly formed together with a small amount of the regioisomers,
3r0,s0. For the 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenyl acetylene (2t) having
methoxy group as the strong electron donating group, it is interest-
ing to note that the reaction proceeded with a regioselectivity to
give the 1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-2-phenylnaphthalenes (3t) as a sin-
gle isomer in 78% yield.
Based on the above observations, one of the possible reaction
pathways is shown in Scheme 2. First, the decarbonylation of Re-
Br(CO)5 to form ReBr(CO)4, which is the coordinative unsaturated
16-electron complex, is the first step of the catalytic reaction.16
The coordination on the phenylacetaldehyde, which is generated
in situ by the hydrolysis of acetal 1a with H2O, followed by the
regioselective electrophilic addition of the Re-aldehyde complex
I to C2 of the alkynes 2 forms the alkenyl cation II. Intramolecular
electrophilic attack of II on the aromatic ring followed by elimina-
tion of a proton generates the cyclization product III, which aro-
matizes to form the naphthalene derivatives 3 and regenerate
the catalytic active species. For the reaction of unsymmetrical dia-
ryl acetylenes, it was suggested that the stability of the alkenyl
cation intermediate II played an important role in the selectivity
of the products.
The results of the reaction of phenylacetaldehyde dimethyl ace-
tal (1a) with various alkynes are shown in Table 2. For the terminal
acetylene, the yield of 1-phenylnaphthalene (3b) decreased due to
the formation of various by-products (entry 1). When 1a was al-
lowed to react with 1-phenyl-1-propyne, 1-phenyl-1-butyne, and
1-pheny-1-pentyne in the presence of H2O and a catalytic amount
of ReBr(CO)5 at 80 °C for 20 h, the 2-methyl-, 2-ethyl-, and 2-pro-
pyl-1-phenylnaphthalenes 3a,c,d were obtained in 50%, 70%, and
62% yields, respectively (entries 2–4). Similarly, the reaction of
1a with the 1-(1-naphthyl)- and 1-(2-naphthyl)-1-pentyne effi-
ciently proceeded to give 1-(1-naphthyl)- and 1-(2-naphthyl)-2-
propylnaphthalenes 3e,f in 75% and 53% yields, respectively (en-
tries 5 and 6). Also, the reaction of 1a with the 1-aryl-1-propyne
substituted electron donating groups, such as methyl and methoxy
groups, bromo, and fluoro groups on the aromatic ring gave the
corresponding 1-aryl-2-propyl naphthalenes 3g–m in moderate
to good yields (entries 7–13). In the case of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-1-
butyne, only uncharacterized products were observed. The
1-(2-thienyl)-2-propylnaphthalene (3n) was prepared by the
rhenium-catalyzed reaction of 1a with 1-(2-thienyl)-1-propyne
(entry 14). For all alkyl aryl acetylenes, other regioisomers were
not detected by the 1H NMR and GC analyses of the crude reaction
mixtures (entries 1–14). One-pot synthesis of the 1,2-diaryl substi-
tuted naphthalenes 3o–q was achieved by the reaction of 1a with
the 1,2-diaryl alkynes (entries 15–17). However, when the
aliphatic alkynes were used, no formation of the corresponding
naphthalenes was observed.
In conclusion, we have developed a rhenium complex-catalyzed
reaction of phenylacetaldehyde dimethylacetal (1a) with alkynes 2
in the presence of H2O, giving the corresponding 1,2-disubstituted
naphthalenes in moderate to good yields. The application of the
reaction and the investigation of the reaction mechanism are
now in progress.
To elucidate the reaction pathways for the regioselective
synthesis of the 1,2-disubstituted naphthalenes by the reaction
of alkynes and phenylacetaldehyde dimethylacetal (1a) in the