8,12-members represent half of the components isolated
from Nature. Although numerous synthetic strategies
exist in order to access the carbocyclic cores of 6,12-
germacranolides9 and 6,12-guaianolides,10 rather few
references appear in the literature for the synthesis of
isomeric 8,12-germacranolides and 8,12-guaianolides,11
and even fewer study their biological profile.
Figure 2. Initial retrosynthetic plan for the synthesis of furano-
germenone (4).
Despite the direct accessibility to the syn-carveol 8,15 its
oxidation to the ketone 7 was perceived to be rather prob-
lematic. Thus, when it was allowed to be oxidized under a
number of reported conditions (chromium pyrazole,16
TEMPO,17 PCC,18 PDC,18b t-BuOOH in the presence of
metals,19 etc.), an inconsistent, inseparable mixture of oxi-
dized products was observed in very low yields (5À12%).
After extended experimentation, it was found that when
anti-carveol 1020 was used instead of 8 in reaction under
singlet oxygen conditions,21 a 2:1 diastereoisomeric mix-
ture of R- and β-hydroxylated products was obtained,
which after selective protection of secondary alcohols with
pivaloyl group and chromatographic purification led to
the desired compound 11 in 39% overall yield (Scheme 1).
Hydroxyl migration of the unprotected tertiary alcohol
followed by direct oxidation with PCC22 afforded the R,β-
unsaturated ketone 12. 1,4-Conjugated addition of vinyl
group, promoted by copper iodide,23 produced the alky-
lated product 13 in high diastereoselectivity (ratio 12:1)
favoring the syn-orientation between the methyl and the
Figure 1. (A) Biosynthetic correlation of sesquiterpenoids and
(B) selected examples of biological active sesquiterpenoids.
Intrigued by the structural infinity and the possible bio-
logical activity of these sesquiterpenes, our group initiated
a research effort to discover a novel and efficient synthetic
route to 8,12-sesquiterpene motifs. The rich diversity of
this class is well delineated by the existence of germacrane,
guaiane, pseudoguaiane, elemane, eudesmane, and linde-
nane subfamilies (Figure 1).4 In a hypothetical carbocyclic
sesquiterpene biosynthetic pyramid, germacranes lay on
top accounting for all the presented diversity. However,
the exact nature and sequence of these biosynthetic steps
are currently unknown, and their investigation remains a
challenging task.12 On the basis of this biosynthetic hy-
pothesis, furanogermenone(4)13 was envisionedasanideal
common synthetic scaffold to access the rich diversity of
the 8,12-subfamily. Retrosynthesis of 4was designed through
an nonreversible oxy-Cope rearrangement of the non-natural
elemane compound 5, avoiding the known equilibration
between germacrane and elemane pair which predomi-
nantly produces the elemane component.14 Elemane 5could
then be disconnected to carveol 8 utilizing an array of
sequential oxidation and alkyl addition steps (Figure 2).
(15) Garver, L.; Van Eikeren, P. J. Org. Chem. 1976, 41, 2273–2274.
(16) Sakagami, M.; Muratake, H.; Natsume, M. Chem. Pharm. Bull.
1994, 42, 1393–1398.
(17) (a) Shibuya, M.; Tomizawa, M.; Iwabuchi, Y. Org. Lett. 2008,
10, 4715–4718. (b) Vatele, J.-M. Tetrahedron 2010, 66, 904–912.
(18) (a) Kuroda, C.; Nakamura, T.; Hirota, H.; Enomoto, K.;
Takahashi, T. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1985, 58, 146–151. (b) Fousteris,
M. A.; Koutsourea, A. I.; Nikolaropoulos, S. S.; Riahi, A.; Muzart, J.
J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 2006, 250, 70–74. (c) Dauben, W. G; Lorber, M.;
Fullerton, D. S. J. Org. Chem. 1969, 34, 3587–3592. (d) Nakayama, M.;
Shinke, S.; Matsushita, Y.; Ohira, S.; Hayashi, S. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn.
1979, 52, 184–185.
(19) (a) Zhao, Y.; Yueng, Y.-Y. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2128–2131.
(b) Catir, M.; Kilic, H. Synlett 2010, 9, 1319–1322. (c) Yang, M.; Peng,
Q.-R; Lan, J.-B.; Song, G.-F.; Xie, R.-G. Synlett 2006, 2617–2620.
(d) Salvator, J. A. R.; Silvestre, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 2581–
2584. (e) Miller, A. R.; Li, W.; Hymphrey, R. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996,
37, 3429–3432. (f) Shing, T. K. M.; Yeung, Y.; Su, P. L. Org. Lett. 2006,
8, 3149–3151.
~
(11) (a) Tanis, S. P.; Robinson, E. D.; McMills, M. C.; Watt, W.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8349–8362. (b) Valot, G.; Garcia, J.;
Duplan, V.; Serba, C.; Barluenga, S.; Winssinger, N. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2012, 51, 5391–5394.
(20) (a) Salvador, J. A. R.; Leitao, A. J.; L.Sa e Melo, L.; Hanson,
J. R. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 1067–1070. (b) The enantiomeric excess
of compound 10 was calculated to be 72%. This material was chirally
resolved to 93% ee.
(12) Miller, D. J.; Allemann, R. K. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2012, 29, 60–71.
(13) Shibuya, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Miura, I.; Kitagawa, I. Hetero-
cycles 1982, 17, 215–218.
(14) (a) Jain, T. C.; Banks, C. M.; McCloskey, J. E. Tetrahedron Lett.
1970, 11, 841–844. (b) Rosselli, S.; Maggio, A.; Raccuglia, R. A.; Bruno,
M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 2690–2694.
(21) Alberti, M. N.; Orfanopoulos, M. Synlett 2010, 999–1026.
ꢀ
ꢀ
(22) Fernandez-Mateos, A.; Ramos Silvo, A. I. R.; Rubio Gonzalez,
R.; Simmonds, M. S. J. Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 7809–7816.
(23) Lipshutz, B. H. Organocopper Chemistry. In Organometallics in
Synthesis: A Manual, 2nd ed.; Schlosser, M., Eds.; Wiley & Sons Ltd.: West
Sussex, 2002; p 762.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 1, 2013
153