Organic Letters
Letter
Consequently, we began our investigations by subjecting
alkenyl carbamate 1a to diborane 2a in the presence of various
bases and ligands. (For details, see the Supporting
Information.) To our delight, this reaction could proceed
when TMEDA was used as a ligand, albeit with poor efficiency
(Scheme 2, entries 1 and 2). The bases were crucial for this
tolerated. Thiophene carbamate could also react well,
providing the borylated product in 67% yield (16). Most
remarkably, the alkenyl carbamates without the π-extend
conjugated system were demonstrated as good substrates for
this borylation, providing the desired products in moderate
yields (19−26, 29, 32, 40−71%). Gratifyingly, unreactive
linear carbamate was also a suitable substrate, and the
corresponding product was isolated in an acceptable yield
(29, 40%). It should be mentioned that the tetra-substituted
alkenyl boronic esters are difficult to synthesize owing to their
steric hindrance and could be obtained in moderate yields
through our protocol (30−32, 40−70%). Encouraged by these
results, the borylation of aryl carbamates was evaluated as well.
When naphthyl carbamates were used as substrates, this
reaction proceeded smoothly, providing the borylated products
in moderate to excellent yields (33−41, 66−92%). Functional
groups, such as methoxy, trifluoromethyl, morpholyl, and
amine, were well-tolerated and afforded the corresponding
products in good yields (36, 38, 39, and 51). Polycyclic
aromatic substrates, such as phenanthryl carbamate, provided
42 in good yield (74%). Furthermore, N-heterocyclic ring
carbazole carbamate underwent this borylation reaction
smoothly as well, producing 44 in a good yield. Additionally,
biphenyl substrates also exhibited good reactivity, delivering
the borylated products in moderate to good yields (45−47,
57−71%). Substrates bearing an ortho bulky phenyl group also
reacted smoothly, producing 49 in reasonable yield.
Importantly, monophenyl carbamates are also applicable to
the reaction and provided the corresponding products in
moderate to excellent yields (50−60, 50−86%). This trans-
formation could be conducted on a 6 mmol scale, and a 58%
yield was obtained. To explore the scope of this trans-
formation, other oxygen-based electrophiles were evaluated.
Oxygen-based groups, such as OTs and OTf, produced the
borylated product in a <6% yield, and the OAc and
OPO(OPh)2 groups could not undergo this transformation
at all, in which a large amount of phenol and protonated
product were observed. The OPiv group could react with
diborane reagent 2a with low efficiency, providing the
corresponding product in 26% yield. (For details, see the
were explored as well, and no transformation occurred. (For
To further evaluate the application of this protocol, the late-
stage borylation of biorelevant compounds, such as estrone,
vitamin E, epiandrosterone, and stanolone carbamates, was
conducted (Scheme 3). The arylboranes and alkenylboranes
could be obtained in moderate to good yields (61−65, 46−
76%), which provided a facile access to the diversification of
phenol and ketone structures. Furthermore, the ortho- or
meta-arylation through C−H bond activation using carbamate
as the directing group was also carried out. The ortho-arylation
of monophenyl carbamates was conducted using Bedford’s
method.16 Furthermore, the ortho-arylated compounds under-
went a further transformation, affording the borylated
compounds in good yields (66−70, 55−67%). Similarly, the
meta-arylated and borylated compounds could also be
delivered in moderate to good yields (71 and 72, 50−
67%).17 These results demonstrate the inherent value of our
protocol, which provides an efficient method for obtaining the
valuable multisubstituted arenes.
Scheme 2. Representative Results for the Optimization of
a
the Iron-Catalyzed Borylation of 1a
a
Reaction conditions (unless otherwise specified): 1a (0.2 mmol, 1.0
equiv), dilborane 2a (0.4 mmol, 2.0 equiv), [Fe] (0.02 mmol, 0.1
equiv), ligand (0.03 mmol, 0.15 equiv), solvent (2.0 mL), base (0.8
b
1
mmol, 4.0 equiv), 100 °C, 15 h. Determined by H NMR using
mesitylene as an internal standard. The isolated yield is shown in
parentheses. MeOLi (5.0 equiv) was used.
c
reaction, and strong bases, such as t-BuOLi and MeOLi, could
promote the reaction. A 15% yield of the desired product could
be delivered using MeOLi as the base. Other bases, such as
K2CO3 and Cs2CO3, could not promote this transformation.
After testing other ligands, dinitrogen ligands stood out,
providing the borylated product in moderate yields (Scheme 2,
2,2-Bipyridine was demonstrated as the best choice, and the
desired product 3 was obtained in 50% yield (Scheme 2, entry
4). Then, other iron sources were evaluated. Fe(OTf)2 could
slightly improve the reaction efficiency, delivering 3 in 53%
yield (Scheme 2, entry 6). Switching the solvent from ethers to
toluene provided the borylated product in 86% yield (Scheme
2, entries 7 and 8). Control experiments were conducted,
which demonstrated the necessity of both an iron catalyst and
ligand. No desired product was observed in the absence of an
iron catalyst, and only a 20% yield of 3 was provided without
the use of a ligand. These results suggest that an electron-rich
ligand, 2,2-bipyridine, plays a crucial role in promoting this
transformation. To rule out the trace-metal effect in this
reaction, copper and nickel catalysts were tested, and no
desired product was observed, which suggested that this
reaction was indeed catalyzed by the iron catalysts.
After the optimal conditions were established, the scope of
this iron-catalyzed borylation reaction was explored. Alkenyl
carbamates could react smoothly, delivering the corresponding
products in moderate to good yields (3−32) (Table 1).
Moreover, this reaction exhibited good functional group
tolerance. Functional groups such as Cl, F, CF3, Tips, Opy
(2-pyridyloxy), and OBn (11, 12, 13, 14, 21, 22) were well-
To gain insight into the mechanism of this iron-catalyzed
borylation reaction, radical inhibition experiments were first
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX