LETTER
3,4-Dihydro-2H-1,3-benzothiazine-2-imines
2641
electron donating than Xantphos and thus tends to disfa-
vor reductive elimination.11,12 A control experiment was
next conducted in order to probe whether intramolecularity
plays a role in the key C–S bond formation. Thus, a mix-
ture of bromobenzene, diethylamine, and cyclohexyl iso-
thiocyanate was reacted under standard conditions to
NMe
S
NMe
R
N
L = ligand
S
NR
Pd
Pd
L
L
L
4
5
Figure 1 Putative κ2-‘isothioamidate’complex 4 and κ1-‘isothioami- deliver the arylated isothiourea 6 in quantitative yield
date’complex 5
(Scheme 2). Apparently, intramolecularity is not a key
driver for the coupling. We believe that the wide-bite-
in dioxane afforded better conversions (still less than two
angle bidendate chelating ligand imposes a great steric
thirds), but the reaction did not proceed to completion at
100 °C. By analogy with the known reluctance of aryl-
strain on the seven-membered ring isothioamidate com-
plex 5, promoting fast reductive elimination of palladium-
bound substituents. The associated cost in energy could
somehow compensate for favorable six-membered ring
amidate complexes to undergo fast reductive elimination
from palladiumII due to κ2-amidate coordination,8 we hy-
pothesized that a putative κ2-‘isothioamidate-type’ com-
formation.
plex 4 may arise in the catalytic cycle (Figure 1), thus
Et2N
N
inhibiting reductive elimination and therefore catalytic
turnover. It has also been shown that the use of large-bite-
angle bidendate ligands prevents κ2-binding modes.9
Et2NH
NCS
Br
S
+
Xantphos, Pd2(dba)3,
Cs2CO3, toluene, 120 °C
Gratifyingly, we found that a system of Xantphos,
Pd2(dba)3, and Cs2CO3 in toluene afforded 3a in quantita-
tive yield. To rule out a possible thiourea cyclization driv-
en by SNAr, a control experiment was carried out under
similar conditions, omitting the catalytic system and, as
expected, no trace of 3a was found. Our protocol was next
exemplified with a range of alkyl isothiocyanates (Table
1, entries 2–8), providing the corresponding 3,4-dihydro-
2H-1,3-benzothiazine-2-imines 3b–h in moderate to ex-
cellent yields.10 Notably, esters and basic groups were tol-
erated in the reaction. Unfortunately, phenyl- and to a
lesser extent benzyl isothiocyanates reacted poorly under
those conditions (Table 1, entries 9 and 10). This trend
was assigned to both a lower nucleophilicity of the inter-
mediate thiourea and an increased ionic character of the
PdII ‘isothioamidate’ complex leading to a stronger Pd–S
bond.9 The reductive elimination was therefore slower
and occurred in very low yield. Eventually, we were able
to achieve reasonable conversion rates and deliver prod-
ucts 3i–j in acceptable yields by increasing temperature,
reaction time, catalyst loading, and using DPPF as an al-
ternative ligand. Although we cannot provide a clear ex-
planation for this ligand effect, we suggest that the
chelating bidendate ligand maintains a fast rate of reduc-
tive elimination for steric reasons – in other words, by en-
forcement of cis geometry and angle minimization
between the two metal-bound substituents. Electronic fac-
tors in this case cannot be invoked since DPPF is more
6
100% yield
Scheme 2 Intermolecular palladium-catalyzed isothiourea coupling
with bromobenzene
In order to expand the scope of the reaction to commer-
cially available chloroarene 7, several attempts using
monodendate ligands were performed but all met with
failure (Scheme 3). More specifically, reactions conduct-
ed in the presence of commercially available bipyrazole
BippyPhos (Figure 2),13 or Buchwald’s XPhos, ligands,
known to promote, respectively, smooth intermolecular
coupling of chloroarenes with phenylureas, and intermo-
lecular o-chloroanilines urea cyclizations afforded 3a
only in trace amounts.14,15 It is recognized that both steri-
cally demanding ligands facilitate dissociation to mono-
phosphine–palladium adducts to which the chloroarene
rapidly oxidatively adds as a result of the phosphine elec-
tron density.16,17 In addition, coordination of the isothio-
urea with the monophosphine LPd(Ar)Cl complex should
also be faster relative to the coordinatively saturated
L2Pd(Ar)Cl complex.8 Therefore, the poor results ob-
served in this C–S bond formation may again stem from
problematic reductive elimination.
In conclusion, a simple procedure to rapidly access the
3,4-dihydro-2H-1,3-benzothiazine-2-imine motif in the
o-bromoarene series has been developed using Pd0 chem-
PPh2
P(Cy)2
N
i-Pr
i-Pr
Fe
N
(t-Bu)2P
O
N
N
PPh2
PPh2
PPh2
i-Pr
Xantphos
DPPF
XPhos
BippyPhos
Figure 2 Ligands used for Pd0-catalyzed isothiourea arylation
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York
Synlett 2012, 23, 2639–2642