bonds.7 Although these methods can deliver 1,3-aminoal-
cohols in a stereoselective fashion, they require multiple
steps and/or suffer from a limited substrate scope.8
Furthermore, rhodium-catalyzed asymmetric hydroge-
nation of β-ketoenamides gives rise to only anti-1,3-
aminoalcohols. Remarkably, very efficient enantioselective
methods to give orthogonally protected 1,3-aminoalcohols
with complete control of their relative and absolute stereo-
chemistry remain undeveloped. Herein we report a concep-
tually distinct method for the very efficient asymmetric
synthesis of orthogonally protected syn- and anti-1,3-amino-
alcohols, which utilizes newly developed air-stable chiral
binfunctional allylation reagents V and ent-V (Scheme 1).
(eq 1 in Scheme 1).9,10 We and others recently disclosed
Ir(I)-catalyzed enantioselective allylic amidation between
ethyl allyl carbonates III and diacylamine nucleophiles to
give protected allylic amines IV (eq 2 in Scheme 1).11,12
A
logical extension of these two observations would be to
combine Nokami’s allyl transfer reaction with the Ir(I)-
catalyzed allylic amidation reaction to create a new chiral
bifunctional reagent V. As shown in Scheme 1, asymmetric
allylation of aldehydes by V is expected to give allyl
carbonates VI. Ir(I)-catalyzed allylic amidation of VI with
diacylamine nucleophiles will initially generate the inter-
mediates VII, which could undergo an intramolecular
1,5-acyl transfer reaction under the appropriate allylic
amidation conditions to finally give orthogonally pro-
tected 1,3-aminoalcohols VIII and IX. If the stereochem-
istry of the amidation step is governed by the chiral ligands
L* or ent-L* used, the presented two-step strategy can
provide a most direct method for the asymmetric synthesis
of orthogonally protected 1,3-aminoalcohols from the
readily available aldehydes with complete control of their
relative and absolute stereochemistry.
Scheme 1. Design Concept of Chiral Bifunctional Reagent V for
the Asymmetric Synthesis of Orthogonally Protected syn- and
anti-1,3-Aminoalcohols
Scheme 2. Asymmetric Synthesis of Enantiomerically Pure
Bifunctional Allyl Transfer Reagent V
Enantiomerically pure binfunctional reagents V and ent-V
were conveniently prepared from commercial 3-methyl-
buten-2-en-1-ol in three steps (Scheme 2). Sharpless asym-
metric epoxidation (AE) of 3-methylbuten-2-en-1-ol (1) by
(þ)-diethyl tartrate (DET) gave rise to the corresponding
2-epoxy alcohol, which was isolated as its p-nitrobenzoate
ester 2.9 Enantiomerically pure 2 (ee > 99%) was obtained
by washing crude 2 with ethyl ether. Reaction of 2 with
Recently the Nokami group reported that, in the pre-
sence of an acid, enantioenriched tertiary homoallylic
alcohol I could react with aldehydes through [3,3]-sigma-
tropic rearrangement to deliver homoallylic alcohols II
withnear-perfectchiralitytransferand highE/Z-selectivity
(8) Reference 5 works only for the terminal methyl group and gives
only an (R)-configuration at the oxygen-substituted carbon due to the
substrate specificity of the enzyme CALB used; ref 6 requires prepara-
tion of β-ketoenamides from the corresponding ketones in two steps;
ref 7 requires five to six steps to prepare 1,3-aminoalcohol derivatives.
(9) Shafi, S. M.; Chou, J.; Kataoka, K.; Nokami, J. Org. Lett. 2005, 7,
2957–2960.
vinylMgCl in the presence of CuBr SMe2 at ꢀ20 °C
3
furnished diol 3,9 which upon treatment with ethyl chlo-
roformate and pyridine transformed into V. The same
reaction sequence using (ꢀ)-DET in the Sharpless AE step
was used to prepare ent-V. Binfunctional reagents V and
ent-V are stable at ambient temperature and can be stored
without any special precautions.
(10) For other similar reports, see: (a) Nokami, J.; Yoshizane, K.;
Matsuura, H.; Sumida, S.-I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 6609–6610.
ꢀ
ꢁ
(b) Malkov, A. V.; Kabeshov, M. A.; Barlog, M.; Kocovsky, P. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1570–1573. (c) Hayashi, S.; Hirano, K.; Yorimitsu, H.;
Oshima, K. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3577–3579. (d) Nokami, J.; Nomiyama,
K.; Shafi, S. M.; Kataoka, K. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1261–1264. (e) Lee,
C.-L. K.; Lee, C.-H. A.; Tan, K.-T.; Loh, T.-P. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1281–
1283. (f) Cheng, H.-S.; Loh, T.-P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 4990–4991.
(g) Nokami, J.; Nomiyama, K.; Matsuda, S.; Imai, N.; Kataoka, K. Angew.
Chem., Intl. Ed. 2003, 42, 1273–1276. (h) Loh, T.-P.; Lee, C.-L. K.; Tan,
K.-T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2985–2987. (i) Nokami, J.; Ohga, M.; Nakamoto,
H.; Matsubara, T.; Hussain, I.; Kataoka, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
9168–9169. (j) Loh, T.-P.; Tan, K.-T.; Hu, Q.-Y. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 2921–2922. (k) Nokami, J.; Anthony, L.; Sumida, S.-I. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2909–2913. (l) Sumida, S.-I.; Ohga, M.; Mitani, J.; Nokami,
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 1310–1313. (m) Loh, T.-P.; Hu, Q.-Y.; Ma,
L.-T. Org. Lett. 2002, 4, 2389–2391.
(11) (a) Weihofen, R.; Tverskoy, O.; Helmchen, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 5546–5549. (b) Pouy, M. J.; Leitner, A.; Weix, D. J.;
Ueno, S.; Hartwig, J. F. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3949–3952. (c) Weix, D. J.;
Markovic, D.; Ueda, M.; Hartwig, J. F. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 2944–2947.
(d) Singh, O. V.; Han, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 774–775.
(e) Singh, O. V.; Han, H. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 4801–4804. (f) Singh,
O. V.; Han, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 7094–7098.
(12) For recent reviews on Ir(I)-catalyzed allylation: (a) Hartwig, J. F.;
Pouy, M. J. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2011, 34, 169–208. (b) Helmchen, G.;
€
Dahnz, A.; Dubon, P.; Schelwies, M.; Weihofen, R. Chem. Commun. 2007,
675–691.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013
555