Communication
NJC
improved a bit (81%) (Table 1, entry 27). Herein also no
formation of 3a took place in the absence of conc. HCl
(Table 1, entry 28).
Thus, the findings (Table 1) in the present work that
the reaction does not require any photocatalyst and instead
24 mol% of aq. HCl can be used has a distinct advantage.
Hence, we planned to explore further the general synthetic
applicability of this newly developed methodology.
Scheme 1 Visible light promoted reaction of 1a with 2a to form 3a.
During initial attempts, the reaction of 1a with 2a under
visible light did not result in the formation of 3a (Table 1,
entries 1–3). However, 3a was produced in 70% yield after 40 h
in the presence of conc. HCl (12 mol%: 10 mL of aq. 12 N)
(Table 1, entry 4). Increase of the amount of conc. HCl to
24 mol% (20 ml of aq. 12 N) increased the yield of 3a to 78% in
30 h (Table 1, entry 5). The reaction either did not proceed to
form 3a or produced 3a in a trace amount when DMSO was
However, though the use of blue LED light afforded com-
parable results for the model reaction (Table 1, entry 27),
inferior product yields were obtained with other substrate
combinations (either taking any substituted arylmethyl amine
or any substituted o-phenylenediamine). Hence, the white
compact fluorescent lamp (CFL) was considered for subsequent
studies to evaluate the substrate scope of the reaction adopting
the reaction conditions of Table 1, entry 5 as the optimized
reaction conditions.
For this purpose, arylmethyl amines bearing different substitu-
tions on the aryl ring and substituted o-phenylenediamines were
considered as coupling partners. With respect to the diversity
of the arylmethyl amines, the reaction proceeded well with
arylmethyl amines bearing electron withdrawing and electron
releasing groups in the aryl moiety. In the case of arylmethyl
amines bearing electron withdrawing groups (Fig. 2, entries 3c,
and 3h) the yields were slightly higher in comparison to those
obtained for the reactions involving the arylmethyl amines con-
taining electron releasing groups in the aryl moiety (Fig. 2, entries
3b, 3d, 3e, and 3f).
i
replaced by other organic solvents (e.g., MeOH, PrOH, MeCN,
dioxane, DMF, EtOAc, THF, toulene, hexane, DCE) or water
(Table 1, entries 8–18). The use of other protic acids such as
HOAc, p-TsOH, TFA, and MsOH or metal salts as a Lewis acid
like CuCl2 and Cu(OTf)2 in place of conc. HCl as the additive
resulted in either no formation of 3a or a substantial decrease
in the yield of 3a (Table 1, entries 19–25). No formation of 3a
was observed in performing the reaction using a photocatalyst
such as Eosin dye (5 mol%) in place of aq. HCl (Table 1, entry
26). The formation of 3a also did not take place in using H2O2
as the additive replacing conc. HCl (Table 1, entry 7). When the
light source was changed to a blue LED, the yield of 3a
Table 1 The reaction of 1a with 2a under different conditions to form 3aa
The scope with respect to various substituted o-phenyle-
nediamines bearing electron withdrawing and electron releasing
groups was also explored. With respect to the o-phenylene-
diamine, substrates bearing electron withdrawing groups (Fig. 2,
entries 3g, 3h, 3i, 3k, and 3l) gave slightly higher yields in
comparison to those having an electron releasing group (Fig. 2,
entry 3n). The reaction worked well with disubstituted o-phenyle-
nediamines as well (Fig. 2, entries 3i, 3j, 3k, and 3l).
Entry Light source Additive
Time (h) Solvent Yieldb (%)
1
2
No light
No light
No additive
HCl (12 mol%)
24
24
24
40
30
24
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
30
DMSO Nil
DMSO Nil
DMSO Nil
DMSO 70
DMSO 78
DMSO Nil
MeOH Trace
MeCN Nil
Dioxane Nil
iPrOH Trace
3
4
5
7
White CFL Without HCl
White CFL HCl (12 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL H2O2
8
9
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL HCl (24 mol%)
White CFL AcOH (35 mol%)
To gain mechanistic insights into the reaction, several
control experiments were designed for the model reaction of
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DMF
EtOAc Nil
THF Nil
Nil
Toluene Nil
Hexane Nil
DCE
H2O
Trace
Nil
DMSO 25
DMSO 40
DMSO 35
DMSO 20
MeCN Nil
DMSO Nil
DMSO Nil
DMSO Nil
DMSO 81
DMSO Nil
White CFL p-TsOH (10 mol%) 30
White CFL TFA (26 mol%)
White CFL MsOH (20 mol%)
White CFL CuCl2 (10 mol%)
White CFL CuCl2 (10 mol%)
30
30
30
30
White CFL Cu(OTf)2 (20 mol%) 30
White CFL Eosin dye (5 mol%) 30
Blue LEDc
Blue LEDc
HCl (24 mol%)
Without HCl
30
30
a
The mixture of 1a (1 mmol) and 2a (1.2 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in DMSO
(4 mL) in an open vessel was treated under light (a 32 W capacity
difference light source was used except for entries 1, 2, 27, and 28) in
the presence of various additives (wherever applicable the HCl used was
aq. 12 N) at room temperature. Isolated yield of 3a. 18 W capacity
light source was used. nil = no formation of 3a.
Fig. 2 Substrate scope with respect to arylmethyl amines and
o-phenylenediamines for the synthesis of 2-aryl benzimidazoles.a a Reac-
tion conditions: 1 (1 mmol) was reacted with 2 (1.2 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) in
DMSO (4 mL) in the presence of conc. HCl (24 mol%; 20 mL of 12 N aq. HCl)
under visible light (32 W White CFL) for 30 h at r.t.
b
c
4570 | New J. Chem., 2021, 45, 4569ꢀ4573
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry and the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 2021