Chang Ming Li et al.
COMMUNICATION
from the excited dyes are recaptured by IÀ before being ex-
tracted to the external circuit. Meanwhile, the reduced dye
is regenerated by I3 . Thus, the semicircle of the IS in the in-
outperforms T2 and P1 with photon conversion efficiency
up to 0.113%, which improves that of P1 by 50%. This
work clearly shows that in triphenylamine-dicyanovinyl-
based donor–acceptor dye molecules, the increased conjuga-
tion length near the anchoring group could significantly im-
prove the device performance, while the increased bridge
ligand between donor and acceptor has a negative effect on
the device efficiency. It is noteworthy that a rationally de-
signed tandem p/n DSC should provide much higher power
conversion efficiency, which is currently under investigation
in our lab.
À
termediate frequency range (Figure S6 in the Supporting In-
formation) also represents the transfer resistance at the
NiO/dye-electrolyte interface, which is the apparent combi-
national effect of hole injection, charge recombination, and
the reduced dye regeneration processes. The apparent
charge-transfer resistance at the NiO/dye–electrolyte inter-
face of the devices obtained from the semicircle of the IS
measured at the open-circuit voltage under illumination are
41.1 (P1), 36.7 (T1), and 57.7 W (T2), which are smaller than
that measured at open-circuit voltage bias in the dark (47.
(P1), 147.8 (T1), and 65.5 W (T2)). Similar to the n-DSCs,
the disparity of charge transfer resistance at NiO/dye-elec-
trolyte interface in the dark and under illumination origi-
nates from the difference of the local IÀ concentration.[25] In
the dark, IÀ is generated at the counter electrode and pene-
trates into NiO film by diffusion. Under illumination, IÀ is
formed “in situ” by dye regeneration at the NiO/electrolyte
interface. As discussed above, higher LUMO level of the
dyes (À3.3 (P1), À3.35 (T1), and À3.4 eV (T2), respectively)
than the redox mediator (À4.15 eV) suggests sufficient driv-
ing force for dye regeneration.[17] Thus the IÀ concentration
could be determined by the reduced dye concentration,
which is relevant to the injection ability of the excited dyes.
Consequently, better hole injection of T1 compared to P1
and T2 results in higher IÀ concentration and hole concen-
tration in the valence band of NiO, and further leads to
lower charge-transfer resistance of T1 under illumination,
which could also be confirmed by its longest exited-state
lifetime stated above. Higher recombination resistance in
the dark and longer hole lifetime of T2-based DSCs than for
P1 are shown in Figure 3b,c. However, the charge-transfer
resistance of T2 under illumination is larger than for P1,
suggesting lower hole injection of T2 than P1, and as
a result bringing about lower efficiency of T2; similar results
have been observed in other p-type dyes.[15]
Acknowledgements
This work is partially financially supported by Singapore National Re-
search Foundation Grant under NRF-CRP2-2007-02, and Institute for
Clean Energy & Advanced Materials, Southwest University, Chongqing,
P.R. China.
Keywords: charge carrier injection
·
donor–acceptor
systems · dye-sensitized solar cells · electronic structure ·
organic materials
[1] B. O’Regan, M. Grꢂtzel, Nature 1991, 353, 737.
[2] L. M. GonÅalves, V. d. Z. Bermudez, H. A. Ribeiro, A. M. Mendes,
Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 655.
[4] P. Qin, H. Zhu, T. Edvinsson, G. Boschloo, A. Hagfeldt, L. Sun, J.
[5] P. Qin, M. Linder, T. Brinck, G. Boschloo, A. Hagfeldt, L. Sun, Adv.
[6] L. Li, E. A. Gibson, P. Qin, G. Boschloo, M. Gorlov, A. Hagfeldt, L.
[8] A. Nattestad, A. J. Mozer, M. K. R. Fischer, Y. B. Cheng, A. Mishra,
[9] P. Qin, J. Wiberg, E. A. Gibson, M. Linder, L. Li, T. Brinck, A. Hag-
[10] H. Yang, G. H. Guai, C. Guo, Q. Song, S. P. Jiang, Y. Wang, W.
[11] T. Ameri, G. Dennler, C. Lungenschmied, C. J. Brabec, Energy En-
[12] S. Mori, S. Fukuda, S. Sumikura, Y. Takeda, Y. Tamaki, E. Suzuki,
[13] A. Morandeira, G. Boschloo, A. Hagfeldt, L. Hammarstrçm, J.
The analysis of the APCE and IS data in the DSCs dem-
onstrates that the position of the inserted thiophene unit
could significantly affect the device performance. The thio-
phene unit inserted at the carboxylic side could extend the
absorption spectrum to enhance the absorption coefficient
and lead to more compact molecular packing on the NiO
surface. Most importantly, the structure modification in T1
increases the distance between the dyeꢁs LUMO and
HOMO parts to greatly inhibit intramolecular recombina-
tion, which actually enhances the hole injection at NiO/dye
interface for high exciton separation, as discussed above, to
result in higher efficiency for T1-sensitized solar cells.
[14] M. Borgstrçm, E. Blart, G. Boschloo, E. Mukhtar, A. Hagfeldt, L.
[15] Y.-S. Yen, W.-T. Chen, C.-Y. Hsu, H.-H. Chou, J. T. Lin, M.-C. P.
In summary, on the basis of the known dye P1, two new
dyes T1 and T2 are facilely synthesized by introducing an
additional thiophene group on the carboxylic anchoring
group, or using bithiophene as a linker to connect the donor
and acceptor, and further used as sensitizers in p-type NiO
dye-sensitized solar cells. T1 with an additional thiophene
inserted between the anchoring group and triphenylamine
[19] Gaussian 09, Revision A.02, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schle-
gel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V.
Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X.
Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L. Son-
nenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa,
M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven,
&
&
&4
&
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Asian J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!