164 S. Lethu et al.
either of the triplet at 77.2 ppm for chloroform-d, or of
the massif at 29.9 ppm for acetone-d6. Splitting pat-
terns are designated as s, singlet; d, doublet; t, triplet;
q, quartet; qi, quintuplet; h: heptuplet; m, multiplet; b,
broad and combinations thereof. Coupling constants
J are reported in hertz (Hz). IR spectra were recorded
with an FTIR Perkin-Elmer Spectrum BX spectrometer.
Low and high resolutions mass spectra were recorded
by navigator LC/MS (source AQA) for electron spray
ionization. UHPLC analyses were realized on Waters
Acquity UPLC system. Elemental analyses were per-
formed by the ICSN Microanalytical Laboratory.
After stirring for 3 h under reflux, water was added to
the reaction mixture. e solution was filtered and the
precipitate was washed with water before purification by
flash chromatography on silica gel (heptane/EtOAc 10:0
to 9:1 (v/v) in 1 h) to afford 3 as a white amorphous solid
(4.52 g, 84%). Mp = 114°C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 1.32 (t, J= 7.0 Hz, 3H), 1.39 (d, J= 6.5 Hz, 6H), 3.54 (h,
J= 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (q, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H), 5.74 (bs, 2H). 13C
NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ14.6, 23.3, 42.0, 60.9, 101.5, 103.8,
112.9, 153.2 153.6, 162.9. IR (film) 3424, 3332, 2982, 2928,
2218, 1668, 1622, 1537, 1296 cm−1. MS (ESI+, CH2Cl2/
MeOH) m/z 293 [M+Na]+. HRMS (ESI+, CH2Cl2/MeOH)
calcd for C11H14N2O2S2Na [M+Na]+ 293.0394, found
293.0401. Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C11H14N2O2S2:
C 48.97, H 5.22, N 10.36, O 11.84, S 23.72; found C 48.87,
H 5.23, N 10.35, O 11.91, S 23.94.
UHPLC analysis
e purity for all target compounds was measured using
reversed-phase UHPLC (HSS C-18 1.8 µm, 2.1 × 50 mm
column) with two different solvent systems: compounds
were eluted with 95:5 A/B for 0.5 min then with a gradient
of 5–100% B/A for 3.5 min followed by 0:100 isocratic for
1 min at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min, where solvent A was
0.1% formic acid in H2O and solvent B was 0.1% formic
acid in MeCN (system 1) or 0.1% formic acid in MeOH
(system 2). Purity was determined on TAC (total absor-
bance current from 200 to 400 nm).
Ethyl 3-bromo-4-cyano-5-(isopropylthio)thiophene-2-
carboxylate (4)
To a solution (CH3CN, 50 mL) of tBuONO (2.9 mL, 25
mmol, 1.5 equiv.) and CuBr2 (4.85 g, 21.7 mmol, 1.3
equiv.) a solution (CH3CN, 50 mL) of 3 (4.5 g, 16.7 mmol,
1 equiv.) was added through cannula. After completion of
the addition, the reaction mixture was stirred for 10 min
at room temperature, poured on a HCl solution (20%,
100 mL) and extracted four times with diethyl ether.
Combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried
over MgSO4 and concentrated under reduced pressure.
e crude product was purified by flash chromatog-
raphy on silica gel (heptane/EtOAc 10:0 to 7:3 (v/v) in
1 h) to afford 4 as a white amorphous solid (5.25 g, 94%).
Mp = 59°C; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 1.39 (t, J= 7.0 Hz,
3H), 1.43 (d, J= 6.5 Hz, 6H), 3.61 (h, J= 6.5 Hz, 1H), 4.38
(q, J= 7.0 Hz, 2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ14.4, 23.3,
42.7, 62.4, 112.8, 117.9, 118.2, 129.1, 154.1, 159.2. IR (film)
2983, 2224, 1722, 1226, 1099, 750 cm−1. MS (ESI+, CH2Cl2/
MeOH) m/z 356 and 358 [M+Na]+. HRMS (ESI+, CH2Cl2/
MeOH) calcd for C11H1279BrNO2S2Na [M+Na]+ 355.9391,
found 355.9384; calcd for C11H1281BrNO2S2Na [M+Na]+
357.9370, found 357.9380. Elemental analysis calcd (%)
for C11H12BrNO2S2: C 39.53, H 3.62, N 4.19, O 9.57, S 19.19;
found C 39.45, H 3.51, N 4.01, O 9.52, S 18.82.
Chemistry
2-(Bis(isopropylthio)methylene)malononitrile (2)
To a solution (DMF, 350 mL) of malononitrile (10.0 g,
151 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (22.0 g, 159 mmol, 1.05
equiv.) was added. After stirring for 30 min at room
temperature, carbon disulfide (9.13 mL, 151 mmol, 1.0
equiv.) was added dropwise and the reaction mixture
was stirred at room temperature for 30 min before
i-propyl iodide (30.3 mL, 302 mmol, 2.0 equiv.) and
tetrabutylammonium bromide (9.75 g, 30.2 mmol, 0.2
equiv.) were then added. After being stirred for 70 h
at 60°C, the reaction mixture was cooled, diluted with
water and extracted four times with diethyl ether. The
combined organic layers were washed with sodium
thiosulfate 5% and brine, dried over MgSO4 and con-
centrated under reduced pressure. The crude product
was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel
(heptane/EtOAc 98:2 (v/v)) to afford 2 as a white amor-
phous solid (24.9 g, 73%). Mp = 68°C; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 1.41 (d, J = 6.5 Hz, 12H), 3.99 (h, J = 6.5 Hz,
2H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) δ 23.2, 42.7, 80.6, 113.1,
180.1. IR (film) 2970, 2928, 2867, 2219, 1479 cm−1. MS
(ESI+, MeOH) m/z 227 [M+H]+. HRMS (ESI+, MeOH)
calcd for C10H15N2S2 [M+H]+ 227.0677, found 227.0670.
Elemental analysis calcd (%) for C10H14N2S2: C 53.06, H
6.23, N 12.38, S 28.33; found C 53.05, H 6.45, N 12.23,
S 28.46.
Ethyl 3-(4-chlorophenyl)-4-cyano-5-(isopropylthio)
thiophene-2-carboxylate (5a)
To a solution (toluene/EtOH 9:1 (v/v), 100 mL) of 4 (5.0 g,
15.0 mmol, 1.0 equiv.), K2CO3 (2 M in water, 18.8 mL, 37.5
mmol, 2.5 equiv.), Pd(PPh3)4 (1.74 g, 1.5 mmol, 10% mol)
and 4-chlorophenyl boronic acid (4.69 g, 30 mmol, 2.0
equiv.) were added. After stirring for 4 h under reflux,
water was added to the reaction mixture which was
extracted three times with EtOAc. Combined organic
layers were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4 and
concentrated under reduced pressure. e crude prod-
uct was purified by flash chromatography on silica gel
(heptane/EtOAc 10:0 to 5:5 (v/v) in 40 min) to afford 5a
as a white amorphous solid (4.99 g, 91%). e analytical
data were identical to those previously reported4.
Ethyl 3-amino-4-cyano-5-(isopropylthio) thiophene-2-
carboxylate (3)
To a solution (EtOH, 60 mL) of 2 (4.5 g, 19.9 mmol, 1.0
equiv.), K2CO3 (3.07 g, 21.9 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) and ethyl
thioglycolate (2.4 mL, 21.9 mmol, 1.1 equiv.) were added.
Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry