that can perform the three-component direct Mannich
reactions of unfunctionalized ketones or aldehydes are
still very limited because many of the reported catalysts
and/or reaction conditions are not compatible with the in
situ generation of the imines.8,9 To our knowledge, with
the exception of a chiral phosphoric acid reported by
Gong and co-workers,9a all of the other catalysts are
mainly amine derivatives4,9b that catalyze the reaction
through the enamine mechanism.9
direct Mannich reactions of active methylene compounds are
known,6,7 such a three-component direct Mannich reaction
of unfunctionalized ketones has not been reported.9,11
Using benzaldehyde (1a), p-toluenesulfonamide, and
1,2-diphenylethanone (3a) as the model substrates, we
initially screened several chiral Brønsted bases (5À12,
Figure 1) for their ability to effect the desired enolate-
mediated three-component Mannich reactions. The results
are summarized in Table 1.
Recently, we demonstrated that Brønsted base catalysts
are capable of inducing aldol reactions of unfunctionalized
ketones.10a The reaction works through the enolate mech-
anism11 and is complementary to the amine-catalyzed
aldol reactions in terms of the substrate scope.10 Because
the reaction mechanisms of the Mannich and aldol reac-
tions are very similar, we envisioned that Brønsted bases
should be also good catalysts for the Mannich reaction of
unfunctionalized ketones via the enolate mechanism. With
this in mind, we recently realized a TMG-catalyzed high
diastereoselective three-component direct Mannich reac-
tion of unfunctionalized ketones.12 Herein we report a bi-
functional Brønsted base-catalyzed highly enantioselective
and diastereoselective three-component direct Mannich reac-
tion of unfunctionalized ketones. To our knowledge,
although enolate-mediated organocatalyzed enantioselective
(6) For some leading examples, see: (a) Uraguchi, M.; Terada, M.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 5356. (b) Terada, M.; Machioka, K.;
Sorimachi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10336. (c) Matsubara, M.;
Kawai, N.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3814.
(d) Seayad, J.; Seayad, A. M.; List, B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128,
1086. (e) Yamanaka, M.; Itoh, J.; Fuchibe, K.; Akiyama, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 6756. (f) Sickert, M.; Schneider, C. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3631.
(7) For some leading examples, see: (a) Robak, M. T.; Trincado, M.;
Ellman, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 15110. (b) Wang, C.-J.; Dong,
X.-Q.; Zhang, Z.-H.; Xue, Z.-Y.; Teng, H.-L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 8606. (c) Liu, T.-Y.; Cui, H.-L.; Long, J.; Li, B. J.; Wu, Y.; Ding,
L.-S.; Chen, Y.-C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 1878. (d) Song, J.;
Wang, Y.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 6048. (e) McCooey,
S. H.; Connon, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 6367. (f) Zhang, H.;
Chuan, Y.-M.; Li, Z.-Y.; Peng, Y.-G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2288.
(g) Han, X.; Kwiatkowski, J.; Xue, F.; Huang, K.-W.; Lu, Y. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 2664.
(8) For examples of Lewis acid catalyzed three-component direct
Mannich reactions of unmodified ketones and aldehydes, see: (a) Xu,
L.-W.; Xia, C.-G.; Li, L. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 8482. (b) Salter, M. M.;
Kobayashi, J.; Shimizu, Y.; Kobayashi, S. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 3533. (c) Das,
B.; Majhi, A.; Reddy, K. R; Suneel, K. J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem. 2007, 274,
83. (d) Phukan, P.; Kataki, D.; Chakraborty, P. Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47,
5523. (e) Rafiee, E.; Eavani, S.; Nejad, F. K.; Joshaghani, M. Tetrahedron
2010, 66, 6858. (f) Kureshy, R. I.; Agrawal, S.; Saravanan, S.; Khan, N. H.;
Shah, A. K.; Abdi, S. H. R.; Bajaj, H. C.; Suresh, E. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51, 489.
(9) For examples of enol-mediated Mannich reactions of unmodified
ketones, see: (a) Guo, Q.-X.; Liu, H.; Guo, C.; Luo, S.-W.; Gu, Y.;
Gong, L.-Z. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 3790. (b) Yalalov, D. A.;
Tsogoeva, S. B.; Shubina, T. E.; Martynova, I. M.; Clark, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 6624.
Figure 1. Catalysts screened for the Mannich reaction (Ar =
3,5-(CF3)2C6H3À; 1-Nap = 1-naphthyl).
With toluene as the solvent, the reaction catalyzed by
quinidine (5) gave a poor yield (10%) and a low ee value
(45%) of the desired 4a (Table 1, entry 1). Similarly, poor
results were obtained when cupreine (6) was used (Table 1,
entry 2). In contrast, quinidine- and quinine-derived thiour-
eas 7 and 8 led to much improved yields and moderate ee
values (Table 1, entries 3 and 4). To our pleasure, when
quinine- or quinidine-derived thioureas 9, 10, 11, and 12
were applied,13 good yields and high diastereoselectivities as
well as excellent enantioselectivities were obtained (Table 1,
entries 5À8). Catalyst 9 was adopted for further optimiza-
tions (Table 1, entries 9À14) since it yields the highest
product yield and ee value. Toluene (entry 5) was identified
as the best solvent for this reaction since the other tested
solvents all led to less satisfactory results. However, it was
found that the ee value of 4a may be improved to 96% when
the reaction was carried out at 0 °C (entry 14).
(10) (a) Guo, Q.; Bhanushali, M.; Zhao, C.-G. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2010, 49, 9460. (b) Guang, J.; Guo, Q.; Zhao, J. C.-G. Org. Lett.
2012, 14, 3174.
(11) For examples of enolate-mediated Mannich reactions of thio-
esters, see: (a) Kohler, M. C.; Yost, J. M.; Garnsey, M. R.; Coltart,
D. M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3376. (b) Utsumi, N.; Kitagaki, S.; Barbas,
C. F., III. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 3405. For examples of enolate-mediated
Mannich reactions of sulfonylimidates, see: (c) Van Nguyen, H.;
Matsubara, R.; Kobayashi, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 5927.
(d) Matsubara, R.; Berthiol, F.; Kobayashi, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 1804.
Once the reaction conditions were optimized, the scope
of this reaction was evaluated, and the results are collected
in Table 2.
(13) Catalysts 9À12 were prepared according to the procedures
reported in: (a) Marcelli, T.; van der Haas, R.; van Maarseveen, J. H.;
Hiemstra, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 929. (b) Liu, Y.; Sun, B.;
Wang, B.; Wakem, M.; Deng, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 418.
(12) Guo, Q.; Zhao, J. C.-G.; Arman, H. Tetrahedron Lett.. 2012, 53,
4866.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013
509