reinvestigate R,β-unsaturated lactams as substrates for
ACA reactions (during the course of our study, Feng, Lin,
et al. published the enantioselective rhodium-catalyzed 1,4-
addition of potassium alkenyltrifluoroborates to R,β-unsa-
turated lactams).9 Herein, we describe the asymmetric
copper-catalyzed Michael addition of alkenyl- and alkyla-
lanes to six-membered conjugated lactams, leading to valu-
able building blocks for the preparation of optically active
nitrogen-containing heterocycles.
Table 1. Optimisation of the Reaction Conditionsa
Very recently, we reported optimized conditions for the
copper-catalyzed 1,4-addition to 2,3-dehydro-4-piperidones.8g
The reaction, promoted by a chiral monodentate phosphine
amineꢀcopper complex, is highly enantioselective, what-
ever the nature of the organoaluminum reagent (alkenyl,
alkyl, and aryl). Assuming that 2,3-dehydro-4-piperidones
and R,β-unsaturated lactams might have similar reactivity,
we decided to start with the same reaction conditions in this
study, on 1a as substrate of choice (prepared from the
commercially available δ-valerolactam, by a three steps
sequence: protection, R-selenation, elimination).7,10 Ac-
cording to the study of Feringa, the right protecting-activat-
ing group had to be selected in his case, in order to get full
conversion and high enantioselectivity.7 The benzyloxycar-
bonyl (Cbz) group was chosen for our test substrate 1a
because it could be cleaved without touching the lactam
function, contrary to other protecting groups.11 As shown in
Table 1, the original conditions developed for 2,3-dehydro-
4-piperidones could be applied on 1a, affording the desired
product 2a with acceptable isolated yield (58%) and a
promising enantioselectivity of 80% (entry 1). The reaction
was catalyzed by the combination of copper(II) naphthe-
nate (CuNp) and a SimplePhos ligand L1, which can be
easily prepared on a multigram scale.8f Coactivation with
Me3Al was also employed for the reaction to proceed, as
previously reported for challenging substrates in the context
of tandem hydroalumination/Cu-catalyzed 1,4-additions.8f,g
The enantiomeric excess could be increased by lowering the
reaction temperature. Unfortunately, it caused a decrease of
the isolated yield, even if the reactions went to completion in
both examples (entries 2 and 3). Running the reaction in
toluene (entry 4) or THF (entry 5) led mainly to a degrada-
tion of the starting material. Interestingly, good results were
obtained when the lactam 1a was added to the reaction
mixture in a toluene solution. These conditions allowed for
the formation of the 1,4-adduct in acceptable isolated yield
(53%) and good enantioselectivity (86%) while preserving
the reaction temperature at a more practical value (entry 6).
entry lactam Cu saltb
solvent
temp (°C) yieldc (%) eed (%)
1
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1a
1b
1a
CuNp Et2O
ꢀ10
ꢀ30
ꢀ50
ꢀ10
ꢀ10
ꢀ10
ꢀ10
ꢀ10
58
55
42
80
84
89
2
CuNp Et2O
3
CuNp Et2O
4e
5e
6
CuNp toluene
CuNp THF
CuNp Et2O/toluene
CuNp Et2O/toluene
CuTC Et2O/toluene
53
42
50
86
66
87
7
8
a Reactions performed on a 0.2 mmol scale, under an Ar atmosphere.
Conversion = 100%, determined by 1H NMR of the crude mixture.
b CuNp = solution of copper(II) naphthenate in pentane; CuTC =
Cu(II) thiophene-2-carboxylate. c Isolated yields. d Determined by
supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) on a chiral stationary phase.
e A degradation of the starting material was mainly observed by 1H NMR
of the crude reaction mixture.
Then, lactam 1b,12 bearing a tert-butoxycarbonyl (Boc)
moiety as an alternative protecting group, was subjected
to this Michael addition. Unfortunately, the corresponding
product 2b was isolated in lower yield and poorer enantio-
selectivity (entry 7). Finally, the reaction was performed in
the presence of copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate (CuTC)
on 1a (entry 8). This copper salt and CuNp gave similar
results. However, the reaction is slightly cleaner in the
presence of the latter. Moreover, the fact that CuNp can
be used as a stock solution and is the cheapest commercially
available organic copper source urged us to choose CuNp
for the following study.
With the optimized conditions in hand, we studied the
nucleophile scope of the reaction (Table 2). Efficient
methodologies were selected for the preparation of the
requisite aluminum-based reagents: either by hydroalumi-
nation of terminal alkynes with DIBAL-H (method A),
which can affordthe branchedvinylalaneinthe presenceof
the right Ni complex (method C) or by lithiumꢀhalogen
exchange from the corresponding alkenyl bromide, fol-
lowed by transmetalation with Me2AlCl (method B).13 As
shown in Table 2, alkyl β-substituted alkenylalanes, made
via hydroalumination with DIBAL-H, could be intro-
duced to 1a effectively, providing the desired 1,4-adducts
in good enantioselectivities and practical yields (entries 1
and 3), which could be improved by increasing the reaction
scale (entry 2). However, a more sterically demanding
alkenylalane, bearing a tert-butyl group, led to a lower
(8) (a) Alexakis, A.; Albrow, V.; Biswas, K.; d’Augustin, M.; Prieto,
O.;Woodward, S. Chem. Commun. 2005, 2843. (b)Vuagnoux-d’Augustin,
M.; Alexakis, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9647. (c) Hawner, C.; Li, K.;
Cirriez, V.; Alexakis, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 8211. (d) Palais,
€
L.; Alexakis, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 10473. (e) Muller, D.; Hawner,
€
C.; Tissot, M.; Palais, L.; Alexakis, A. Synlett 2010, 1694. (f) Muller, D.;
€
Tissot, M.; Alexakis, A. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 3040. (g)Muller, D.;Alexakis,
€
A. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 1842. (h) Muller, D.; Alexakis, A. Chem. Commun.
2012, 48, 12037.
(9) Yu, H.-J.; Shao, C.; Cui, Z.; Feng, C.-G.; Lin, G.-Q. Chem.;Eur.
J. 2012, 18, 13274.
(10) (a) Casamitjana, N.; Lopez, V.; Jorge, A.; Bosch, J.; Molins, E.;
Roig, A. Tetrahedron 2000, 56, 4027. (b) Foti, C. J.; Comins, D. L.
J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 2656.
(11) As stated in the Supporting Information of ref 7.
ꢁ
ꢁ
´
nguez, G.; Perez-Castells, J.
(12) del Villar, I. S.; Gradillas, A.; Domı
Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 3095.
(13) For details about these methodologies (advantages and
limitations), see ref 8g and references cited therein.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 4, 2013
829