Studies on selective b/b0 bromination
Table 1 Heck coupling reaction of 3a with methyl acrylate
Entry
T(°C)
Catalyst (ligand)
Isolated yield (%)
Material recovered (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
40
60
Pd2(dba)3 (AsPh3)
Pd2(dba)3 (AsPh3)
Pd2(dba)3 (AsPh3)
Pd2(dba)3 (AsPh3)
Pd(PPh3)4
8
9
90
88
90
54
0
36
120
90
0
47
82
44
90
Pd(OAc)2 (PPh3)
Trace
DMF was used as solvent and NEt3 as the base
in 5 as shown in Scheme 2.2 Unfortunately, the two isomers in 5a or 5b are still
inseparable at this stage.
To introduce a less linear double bond linkage, we next investigated the Heck
coupling reaction of 3 with methyl acrylate [21–23]. On the basis of the results
obtained from the above Sonogashira coupling reaction, the Heck coupling reaction
was first examined by employing Pd2(dba)3 as catalyst, AsPh3 as additional ligand,
and NEt3 as the base. In this reaction, DMF was used as the solvent. The studies
began with the determination of the optimal temperature for the coupling reaction of
3a as shown in Table 1 (entries 1–4). It was found that the best result was obtained at
90 °C; the coupling product 6a was obtained in 54 % yield and 36 % starting
material recovered.3 At low temperature, such as 40 and 60 °C, most starting
materials were recovered and only trace amounts of the coupling product produced.
At the optimal temperature, we examined the influence of the catalyst on the
coupling reaction. Both Pd(0) and its precursor Pd(II) were evaluated in the presence
of a proper base at 90 °C (Table 1, entries 5 and 6).4 The highest yield (82 %) of
coupling product was achieved with air-stable Pd(OAc)2 as pre-catalyst, PPh3 as both
2
General procedure for Sonogashira reaction: To
a solution of 3 (30.0 l mol) and methyl
4-ethynylbenzoate (48.0 mg, 0.3 mmol) in 10 ml dry THF was added Pd2(dba)3 (13.8 mg, 15 l mol),
AsPh3(3.7 mg, 12.0 l mol) in a glove box under N2. NEt3 (2 mL) was then added respectively via a
syringe under N2. After the resulting mixture was refluxed for 24 h under N2, the solvent was removed in
vacuo. The residue was submitted to preparative TLC using dichloromethane as eluent to provide the
coupling product. Representative data: compound 4a (9.1 mg, 30.0 % yield). UV/Vis (THF):
k
max(nm)(e,103 M-1 cm-1): 476 (171), 612 (14.7), 678.4 (11). 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) d 9.97
(s, 1H), 9.60 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 0.66 H), 9.54 (d, J = 4.6 Hz, 0.33H), 9.43 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 9.19–10 (m,
1H), 8.81 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H), 8.75–8.49 (m, 5H), 8.40 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 8.30 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H),
8.18–8.05 (m, 2H), 8.04–7.53 (m, 15H), 7.48 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.35–7.26 (m, 1H), 7.25–7.16 (m, 1H),
3.91 (s, 3H). MALDI-TOF: m/z calcd for C66H36N4O4Zn (M?), 1,012.2028; found, 1,012.0293
3
General procedure for Heck reaction: A solution of 3 (11.9 l mol), Pd(OAc)2 (0.11 mg, 0.5 l mol),
PPh3(0.83 mg, 2.7 l mol), methyl acrylate (0.3 mmol) in 5 ml dry DMF and 2 ml NEt3, and the resulting
solution was heated for 12 h under the nitrogen atmosphere. Then, the solvent was evaporated to dryness.
The resulting mixture was submitted to preparative TLC using dichloromethane as eluent to give the
coupling product. Representative data: compound 6a (9.1 mg, 82.0 % yield). UV/Vis (THF): kmax(nm)(e,
1
103 M-1 cm-1): 474 (104.7), 612 (11), 692 (9). H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO) d 9.96 (s, 1H), 9.67–9.49
(m, 1H), 9.46–9.35 (m, 1H), 9.25–9.06 (m, 1H), 8.95–8.42 (m, 6H), 8.42–8.33 (m, 1H), 8.30
(d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 8.17–7.42 (m, 16H), 7.32–7.18 (m, 2H), 6.36 (d, J = 16.0, 15.8 Hz, 1H), 3.88–3.63
(m, 3H). MALDI-TOF: m/z calcd for C60H34N4O4Zn (M?), 938.1872; found, 938.1633
4
See supplementary data for the detail
123