M. Lautens, Top. Curr. Chem., 2010, 292, 1; (f) D. Alberico,
M. E. Scott and M. Lautens, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 174; (g)
Next, differently substituted aryl iodides were used to explore
the scope of the new tandem reaction, conducted under optimized
conditions. The results, summarized in Table 2, show that the
electronic nature of para-substituents on the aryl iodide has a
significant effect on the reaction (entries 2–5). Specifically, elec-
tron donating group substituted aryl iodides undergo inefficient
reactions owing to a slow oxidative insertion step converting
Pd(II) to Pd(IV) (entry 3). In addition, the steric bulk of meta aryl
iodide substituents can be used to govern the regioselectivity of the
C–H activation step. As demonstrated by reactions of the meta-
tert-butyl and -methoxycarbonyl substituted aryl iodides 2g and
2h that yield the respective benzoxanthones 4g and 4h, the course
of the process is guided by steric hindrance (entries 7 and 8). As
expected, mixtures of two benzoxanthones, arising by C–H acti-
vation at either ortho-phenyl site, are generated in reactions of the
aryl iodides 2i, 2j and 2k, which contain smaller electron-donating
or electron-withdrawing meta-groups (entries 9–11). It should be
noted that reactions of aryl iodides bearing ortho-CH3, -OMe and
-CF3 substituents are low yielding, perhaps because of steric
effects that slow oxidative insertion in the Pd(II) intermediate B.
It is significant that the heteroaryl iodides, 2-iodothiophene, 4-
iodopyridine and 3-iodoindole, undergo this reaction to give the
desired products in moderate to good yields. In contrast, bro-
mobenzene can not be used in place of its iodide counterpart as the
coupling partner, presumably because it does not react with the
palladium(II) metallacycle intermediate. Lastly, different 3-iodo-
chromones containing both electron-withdrawing and -donating
substituents on the chromonering react with4-iodotoluene (Table
3) to give the corresponding benzoxanthones in good yields.
~
K. Muniz, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 9412; (h) P. Sehnal,
R. J. K. Taylor and I. J. S. Fairlamb, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 824.
2 (a) G. Maestri, E. Motti, N. Della Ca, M. Malacria, E. Derat and
M. Catellani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 8574; (b) M. Catellani
and E. Motti, New J. Chem., 1998, 22, 759.
3 For selected recent examples of the Catellani reaction via sp2–sp2
coupling, see: (a) M. Blanchot, D. A. Candito, F. Larnaud and
M. Lautens, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 1486; (b) D. A. Candito and
M. Lautens, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6713; (c) N. Della
Ca, G. Maestri and M. Catellani, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 7850; (d)
N. Della Ca, E. Motti, A. Mega and M. Catellani, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2010, 352, 1451; (e) K. M. Gericke, D. I. Chai, N. Bieler and
M. Lautens, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1447; (f)
F. Jafarpour and H. Hazrati, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2010, 352, 363; (g)
L. Jiao and T. Bach, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 12990; (h)
G. Maestri, N. Della Ca and M. Catellani, Chem. Commun., 2009,
4892; (i) G. Maestri, M.-H. Larraufie, E. Derat, C. Ollivier,
^
L. Fensterbank, E. Lacote and M. Malacria, Org. Lett., 2010, 12,
5692; (j) E. Motti, N. Della Ca, S. Deledda, E. Fava, F. Panciroli
and M. Catellani, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4291; (k) Y.-B. Zhao,
B. Mariampillai, D. A. Candito, B. Laleu, M. Li and M. Lautens,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 1849; (l) D. G. Hulcoop and
M. Lautens, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 1761.
4 (a) K. Albrecht, O. Reiser, M. Weber, B. Knieriem and A. de Meijere,
Tetrahedron, 1994, 50, 383; (b) M. Catellani and G. P. Chiusoli, J.
Organomet. Chem., 1985, 286, c13.
5 (a) N. Della Ca, G. Maestri, M. Malacria, E. Derat and M. Catellani,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 12257; (b) M.-H. Larraufie,
ꢀ
G. Maestri, A. Beaume, E. Derat, C. Ollivier, L. Fensterbank,
^
C. Courillon, E. Lacote, M. Catellani and M. Malacria, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 12253.
6 (a) S. Khadem and R. J. Marles, Molecules, 2011, 17, 191; (b)
N. F. L. Machado and M. P. M. Marques, Curr. Bioact. Compd.,
2010, 6, 76; (c) S. K. Sharma, S. Kumar, K. Chand, A. Kathuria,
A. Gupta and R. Jain, Curr. Med. Chem., 2011, 18, 3825.
7 (a) D. Kim and S. Hong, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 4466;(b) F. Chen, Z. Feng,
C. Y. He, H.-Y. Wang, Y. L. Guo and X. Zhang, Org. Lett., 2012, 14,
1176; (c) K. H. Kim, H. S. Lee, S. H. Kim and J. N. Kim, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2012, 53, 2761–2764; (d) M. Khoobi, M. Alipour, S. Zarei,
F. Jafarpour and A. Shafiee, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 2985–2987.
8 (a) B. Chao, S. Lin, Q. Ma, D. Lu and Y. Hu, Org. Lett., 2012, 14,
2398; (b) H. Chen, F. Xie, J. Gong and Y. Hu, J. Org. Chem., 2011,
76, 8495; (c) L. Zhao, F. Xie, G. Cheng and Y. Hu, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6520; (d) F. Xie, H. Chen and Y. Hu, Org. Lett.,
2010, 12, 3086; (e) Y. Liu, L. Huang, F. Xie and Y. Hu, J. Org.
Chem., 2010, 75, 6304; (f) Y. Liu, L. Huang, F. Xie, X. Chen and
Y. Hu, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 2680.
9 (a) H.-J. Cho, M.-J. Jung, S. Woo, J. Kim, E.-S. Lee, Y. Kwon and
Y. Na, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2010, 18, 1010; (b) Y. Ren,
L. B. S. Kardono, S. Riswan, H. Chai, N. R. Farnsworth,
D. D. Soejarto, E. J. Carcache de Blanco and A. D. Kinghorn, J. Nat.
Prod., 2010, 73, 949; (c) G. W. Rewcastle, G. J. Atwell, L. Zhuang,
B. C. Baguley and W. A. Denny, J. Med. Chem., 1991, 34, 217.
10 (a) N. Barbero, R. SanMartin and E. Dominguez, Tetrahedron,
2009, 65, 5729; (b) N. Barbero, R. SanMartin and E. Dominguez,
Green Chem., 2009, 11, 830; (c) E. Chevenier, C. Lucatelli,
U. Pandya, W. Wang, Y. Gimbert and A. E. Greene, Synlett,
2004, 2693; (d) D. S. Clarke, C. D. Gabbutt, J. D. Hepworth and
B. M. Heron, Tetrahedron Lett., 2005, 46, 5515; (e) S. H. Kim,
J. R. Gunther and J. A. Katzenellenbogen, Org. Lett., 2008, 10,
4931; (f) R. C. Larock and Q. Tian, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
2002; (g) J. Li, C. Jin and W. Su, Heterocycles, 2011, 83, 855; (h)
W.-Z. Xu, Z.-T. Huang and Q.-Y. Zheng, J. Org. Chem., 2008,
73, 5606; (i) J. Zhao and R. C. Larock, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 4273;
(j) J. Zhao and R. C. Larock, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 583.
11 (a) E. Motti and M. Catellani, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 565.
12 (a) S. I. Gorelsky, D. Lapointe and K. Fagnou, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2008, 130, 10848; (b) M. Lafrance and K. Fagnou, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2006, 128, 16496; (c) M. Lafrance, S. I. Gorelsky and
K. Fagnou, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 14570; (d) M. Nakanishi,
Conclusions
In the investigation described above, we have developed a highly
efficient cascade process that involves unique C–H activation of
the 2-position of the chromone ring system. The compatibility of
this novel reaction with aryl iodides allows for an efficient method
to prepare benzoxanthones. The high selectivity of the novel Pd/
norbornene catalytic system should be applicable to reactions that
result in the construction of interesting fused ring systems. More-
over, observations made in this study suggest that slightly different
catalysts might be needed for reactions of each substrate type and
that the Pd/norbornene catalytic system may be more mechanis-
tically complicated than previously believed. We anticipate that
thenovelreactiondiscoveredinthis investigationwillbeapplicable
to other substrates and that future studies in this area will lead to
the development of more comprehensive catalytic systems.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grant from National Natural
Science Foundation of China (21172232) and the Ministry of
Science and Technology of China (2009CB940903)
Notes and references
1 For selected reviews, see: (a) M. Catellani, Top. Organomet. Chem.,
2005, 14, 21; (b) M. Catellani, E. Motti and N. Della Ca, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2008, 41, 1512; (c) M. Catellani, E. Motti, F. Faccini and
R. Ferraccioli, Pure Appl. Chem., 2005, 77, 1243; (d) M. Lautens,
D. Alberico, C. Bressy, Y.-Q. Fang, B. Mariampillai and T. Wilhelm,
Pure Appl. Chem., 2006, 78, 351; (e) A. Martins, B. Mariampillai and
€
D. Katayev, C. Besnard and E. P. Kundig, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2011, 50, 7438.
13 S. Deledda, E. Motti and M. Catellani, Can. J. Chem., 2005, 83, 741.
Chem. Sci.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012