10
Z. Zhang et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 105 (2013) 8–13
1396, 1356, 785, 759. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz) d (ppm): 0.98 (3H,
t, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.45 (2H, m), 1.73 (2H, m), 3.59 (4H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 3.80
(4H, t, J = 6.5 Hz), 4.18 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.46 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz),
7.75 (1H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 8.55 (2H, t, J = 8.5 Hz), 8.61 (1H, d,
J = 7.5 Hz). LC–MS [M+H]+: m/z, found. 393.1130. Calcd. 393.1100.
The second method is one step less than the first method, but
the reaction system is complicated and the purification of the tar-
get product is difficult, which may be result from the instability of
DMA.
Sensitivity of BTABN to pH
BTABN
To a solution of NaH (0.15 g, 6.25 mM) and EtSH (3 mL,
40.4 mM) in dry tetrahydrofuran (THF) (15 mL), intermediate 3
(0.2 g, 0.5 mM) in dry THF (5 mL) was added dropwise over
10 min under stirring. The mixture was refluxed for 48 h, then
the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure and the resi-
due was purified by column chromatography using ethyl acetate/
cyclohexane (1/10, v/v) as eluent to afford BTABN (0.12 g, yield:
54.1%). IR (KBr pellet, cmꢁ1): 2959, 2928, 2869, 1695, 1655,
1591, 1465, 1397, 1356, 784, 760. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 300 MHz) d
(ppm): 0.902 (3H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 1.215 (6H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 1.448
(2H, m), 1.703 (2H, m), 2.474 (4H, m), 2.703 (4H, t, J = 7.5 Hz),
3.611 (4H, t, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.177 (2H, t, J = 7.5 Hz), 7.327 (1H, d,
J = 8.1 Hz), 7.691 (1H, t, J = 8.1 Hz), 8.494 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz), 8.575
(1H, d, J = 7.2 Hz). 13C NMR (CDCl3, 100 MHz) d (ppm): 13.90,
20.08, 30.03, 31.36, 32.15, 38.09, 39.97, 41.00, 53.61, 55.25,
117.76, 118.55, 123.10, 126.07, 127.70, 129.83, 130.07, 131.46,
152.38, 163.90. LC–MS [M + H]+: m/z, found. 445.1980. Calcd.
445.1900. Elementary analysis: C24H32N2O2S2 (444.1900); Calcd.
(%): C 64.14, H 7.29, N 6.21, found (%): C 64.83, H 7.25, N 6.30.
In order to examine the disturbance of proton to the detection
of Hg2+, the UV–vis absorption and fluorescence spectra of BTABN
in EtOH/Britton–Robinson buffer (1/2, v/v) solutions with different
pH values were determined (Figs. 1 and 2). The spectra did not
show obvious change from pH 2.11 to 10.93, which well matches
the above design idea. This pH insensitivity of BTABN is beneficial
to the detection of Hg2+ in different media.
Sensing behaviors of BTABN to Hg2+
The response of UV–vis absorption spectra to Hg2+
The response of BTABN to different metal ions, such as Na+, K+,
Mg2+, Ca2+, Cr3+, Mn2+, Fe3+, Fe2+, Co2+, Ni2+, Cu2+, Zn2+, Cd2+, Hg2+
and Pb2+ were investigated first by UV–vis absorption spectra.
The EtOH/H2O (1/2, v/v) solution of BTABN (10
low in color without cations. Its absorption wavelength maximum
was 436 nm and the molar extinction coefficient was 13,600 Mꢁ1
cmꢁ1. Upon addition of the above cations (100
M), the maximal
lM) is bright yel-
-
l
weakening and broadening (toward short wavelength) of the
Results and discussion
Design and synthesis of BTABN
0.4
0.4
The photoinduced electron transfer (PET) system is one of the
most popular approaches to the design of ‘‘turn-on’’ fluorescent
sensors. However, the PET-based sensors are usually pH sensitive,
which interferes in the detection of other cations. Intramolecular
charge transfer (ICT) is another important mechanism for the de-
sign of optical sensors. ICT-based sensors have obvious blueshift
or redshift in the UV–vis absorption and fluorescence spectra,
accompanied by naked eye color changes. However, they generally
do not exhibit remarkable fluorescence enhancement. It can be
rationally imagined that highly selective and sensitive colorimetric
and ‘‘turn-on’’ optical sensors can be achieved if the advantages of
the PET and ICT-based sensors are integrated. 1,8-Naphthalimide is
one of the most suitable fluorophores for building PET and ICT-
based sensors [19–21,24–26]. The functional groups containing
N, S and O, especially S atom, are frequently-used ligand for Hg2+
0.2
0.0
4
8
12
0.2
pH
0.0
300
400
500
600
Wavelength /nm
Fig. 1. UV–vis absorption response of BTABN upon different pH values. Solvent:
EtOH/Britton–Robinson buffer (1/2, v/v); c: 10 M. From top to bottom, pH: 9.18,
2.98, 8.60, 4.42, 2.11, 6.92, 6.12, 3.94, 5.38, 10.93, 10.18 and 7.92. Inset: plots of
l
maximal absorbance (A) depending on the pH values.
[5,6]. Therefore,
a thioether-rich bis[2-(ethylthio)ethyl]amino
group is chosen as the receptor and attached to the C-4 position
of the 1,8-naphthalimide. The binding ability of the S atom to pro-
ton is weaker than that of the N atom, leading to the possibility of
eliminating the PET-caused pH sensitivity, while the thiophilic nat-
ure of mercury can arouse PET-caused fluorescence enhancement.
The extreme affinity of Hg2+ to sulfur over other metal ions can im-
prove the specificity of the sensor [27]. In addition, the N atom
directly linked to the C-4 position of the naphthalene ring can in-
6.0x105
8.0x105
4.0x105
3.0x105
0.0
4
8
12
pH
duce ICT in the sensor molecule upon coordinating with Hg2+
.
The constructed sensor (BTABN) is therefore expected to meet
the designed demand.
0.0
BTABN was tried to be synthesized by two routes. One is a four-
step reaction process, as shown in Scheme 1. Intermediate 2, 3 and
BTABN can be easily purified by column chromatography, and
BTABN can be obtained successfully with 53.2% yield. In the other
method, 3,9-dithia-6-monoazaundecane (DMA) is first prepared by
bis(2-chloroethyl)amine hydrochloride and EtSH according to Ref.
[28], then, reacted with N-n-butyl-4-bromo-1,8-naphthalimide.
500
600
Wavelength /nm
700
Fig. 2. Fluorescence response of BTABN upon different pH values. Solvent: EtOH/
Britton–Robinson buffer (1/2, v/v); c: 10 M; kex: 430 nm; slit width: 5 nm. From top
to bottom, pH: 7.92, 2.11, 2.98, 9.18, 8.60, 6.92, 10.16, 6.12, 4.42, 10.93, 5.42 and
l
3.94. Inset: plots of fluorescence intensity maxima (I) depending on the pH values.