protocols2ꢀ5 for the asymmetric synthesis of 2,5-disubsti-
tuted pyrrolidines have been developed recently. However,
practical preparation of optically active cis-2,5-disubsti-
tuted pyrrolidines such as 1 still remains a challenging task
to date. In fact, the central problem of the initial syntheses1
of 1 essentially lies in the tortuous nature of setting the
desired stereochemistry via chiral auxiliaries1a,b or not
readily available chiral starting materials.1a,b We envi-
sioned that a straightforward approach to prepare cis-
pyrrolidine 1 (Scheme 1) could be accomplished through
an intramolecularly induced asymmetric reduction of the
corresponding pyrrolidine imine intermediate derived
from amino ketoneprecursor 2 with the C10,C2 stereogenic
centers established already. On the basis of stereofacial
bias of the pyrrolidine, in principal, high cis C2,C5 selec-
tivity should be achievable by optimizing proper reduction
conditions and/or by modifying the R group of 2 to
amplify the capability of asymmetric induction.
quantities. Alternatively, we envisioned that an effective
preparation of syn 1,2-amino alcohol could be possible via
an selective asymmetric ketone reduction of the correspond-
ing enantiomer ent-(S)-5 as a fast epimerization of 5 can be
achieved under dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR) con-
ditions (Scheme 1).
For this synthetic strategy, a one-pot through-process
was first developed to prepare the desired R-amino β-keto
ester 9 (Scheme 2). Treatment of glycine ester 7 with benzoyl
chloride under SchottenꢀBaumann reaction conditions at
0 °C, in the presence of Na2CO3 or Et3N, gave the corre-
sponding benzamide in >95% assay yield. The aqueous
phase was discarded; the organic layer was solvent switched
to dry MeCN and treated with (Boc)2O in the presence of a
catalytic amount of DMAP to afford 8. Without workup,
the reaction stream in the same pot was directly treated with
a solution of t-BuOK in THF at 0ꢀ5 °C. As such, 8 was
rearranged to 9 through an intramolecular nucleophilic
attack on the amide carbonyl group, a Chan-type NfC
benzoyl migration,10 effectively affording the desired keto
ester 9. Thus, ester 9 was directly isolated from aqueous
i-PrOH in 90% yield over three steps.
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis of Pyrrolidine 1
Scheme 2. Through-Process to Keto Ester 9
With 9 in hand, we started to explore the opportunities
to prepare the desired syn-1,2-amino alcohol 10. Studies
showed that a fast epimerization of ketone 9 could beeasily
achieved with a weak base such as Et3N. However, DKR
hydrogenation of racemic 9 in the presence of Noyori’s
Ru-BINAP catalyst, which, to our knowledge,7 is the only
reported method for the asymmetric preparation of syn-1,2-
amino alcohol analogues of 10 through a reduction of
R-amino-β-keto esters at the time,11 resulted in an extremely
slow reaction with low conversion under various conditions.7
In parallel, we also investigated the preparation of 10 via
an enzymatic DKR reduction. If the desired enzymatic
reactivity converting 9 to 10 (even with low conversion)
could be realized through screening, we were confident
that we could evolve/develop the initial proof-of-concept
result to a practical process through enzyme evolution, given
the recent development and success on enzyme engineering
technology.12
Further, a retro-synthetic disconnection of ketone 2
leads to a syn 1,2-amino alcohol aldehyde 3 and phospho-
nate 4.6 In comparison with the previous synthesis,1 the
application of a HornerꢀWadsworthꢀEmmons reaction
can offer a significant convergence to access pyrrolidine 1.
However, a literaturesurveyshowed thatmethodologiesto
establish a syn stereochemistry relationship of 1,2-amino
alcohols in an open-chain system, such as 2 (R = H), have
been lacking, while the corresponding undesired anti 1,2-
amino alcohols can be easily prepared enantioselectively.7
Several approaches to prepare precursor 3 were explored.
The use of amino diol 6, which has the desired C10 and C2
stereochemistry, is not feasible for large-scale preparation8,9
because 6 is not commercially readily available in large
(6) Maloney, K. M.; Chung, J. Y. L. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7574–
7576.
(10) (a) Farran, D.; Parrot, I.; Toupet, L.; Martinez, J.; Dewynter, G.
Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008, 6, 3989–3996. (b) Hara, O.; Ito, M.; Hamada,
Y. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 5537–5540.
(11) Noyori, R.; Ikeda, T.; Ohkuma, T.; Widhalm, M.; Kitamura,
M.; Takaya, T.; Akutagawa, S.; Sayo, N.; Saito, T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1989, 111, 9134–9135.
(7) (a) Liu, Z.; Schultz, C. S.; Sherwood, C. A.; Krska, S.; Dormer,
P. G.; Desmond, R.; Lee, C.; Cherer, E. C.; Shpungin, J.; Cuff, J.; Xu, F.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2011, 52, 1685–1688. (b) Seashore-Ludlow, B.; Villo,
€
P.; Hacker, C.; Somfai, P. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 5274–5277and references
cited therein.
(8) To support the early development work, a process to prepare
(12) For an excellent example, see: Savile, K. C.; Janey, J. M.;
Mundorff, E. C.; Moore, J. C.; Tam, S.; Jarvis, W. R.; Colbeck, J. C.;
Krebber, A.; Fleitz, F. J.; Brands, J.; Devine, P. N.; Huisman, G. W.;
Hughes, G. J. Sciences 2010, 329, 305–309.
aldehyde 12 from 6 was also developed.9
(9) For more detailed discussion, see the Supporting Information.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX