ChemComm
Communication
reaction was subjected to the same reaction sequence to give (E)-enamide
16 (see ESI† for details). Notably the acylation and Teoc-deprotection
steps proceeded smoothly and could be conducted on larger scale than
in the (Z)-series with no decrease in reaction yield. Presumably this is a
reflection of the substantially lower steric crowding around the enamide
in the (E)-series compared to the (Z)-series, where, particularly in the
case of 10, a planar, conjugated arrangement is difficult to achieve.
Similarly, reaction of (Z)-enamide 9 with TBAF was significantly faster
than the corresponding (E)-isomer (1 hour at room temperature vs.
ca. 50% consumption after 2 days), indicating orders of magnitude
difference in reactivity between the two double bond isomers.
§ The (E)-enamide 16 was also progressed to the same stage but the
SEM group again could not be cleanly removed to afford the (E)-isomer
of kottamide E. See ESI† for details.
1 D. R. Appleton and B. R. Copp, Tetrahedron Lett., 2003, 44, 8963.
2 D. R. Appleton, M. J. Page, G. Lambert, M. V. Berridge and
B. R. Copp, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 5402.
3 R. Brettle and A. J. Mosedale, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1, 1988,
2185.
4 K. Kuramochi, H. Watanabe and T. Kitahara, Synlett, 2000, 397.
5 A. B. Smith III and J. Zheng, Synlett, 2001, 1019; A. B. Smith III and
J. Zheng, Tetrahedron, 2002, 58, 6455.
6 J. T. Feutrill, M. J. Lilly and M. A. Rizzacasa, Org. Lett., 2002, 4,
525; J. T. Feutrill, M. J. Lilly, J. M. White and M. A. Rizzacasa,
Tetrahedron, 2008, 64, 4880.
Scheme 3 Total synthesis of kottamide E. Reagents and conditions: (i) t-BuO2-
CCH2P(O)(OPh)2, NaH, THF, À78 1C, 78% + 5% (E)-isomer; (ii) TFA, CH2Cl2 then
NaH, DPPA, THF; (iii) TMSCH2CH2OH, toluene, reflux; (iv) NaHMDS, MeO2CC(O)Cl,
THF then TBAF, THF, 32% over 5 steps; (v) aq. NaOH, MeOH, THF, 97%; (vi) 3ÁHCl,
HBTU, DMF, Et3N, 38%.
7 K. Kuramochi, Y. Osada and T. Kitahara, Tetrahedron, 2003,
59, 9447.
8 T. B. Parsons, C. Ghellamallah, L. Male, N. Spencer and R. S.
Grainger, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2011, 9, 5021.
9 For a similar approach to 3 see: E. M. Boyd and J. Sperry, Synlett,
2011, 826.
10 For recent syntheses of 5,6-dibromoindole containing natural pro-
ducts, in addition to ref. 8 and 9, see: A. Mollica, A. Stefanucci,
F. Feliciani, G. Lucente and F. Pinnen, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011,
52, 2583; J. Sperry, Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 4042; J. Sperry,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2011, 52, 4537.
11 K. Ando, J. Org. Chem., 1997, 62, 1934; K. Ando, J. Org. Chem., 1999,
64, 8406.
12 E. Morera, M. Nalli, F. Pinnen, D. Rossi and G. Lucente, Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett., 2000, 10, 1585; E. Morera, G. Lucente, G. Ortar, M. Nalli,
F. Mazza, E. Gavuzzo and S. Spisani, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2002,
10, 147.
range of SEM deprotection conditions, suggests an inherent
sensitivity of the natural product that means the choice of final
steps in future syntheses of kottamide E should be of particular
concern.
We thank EPSRC for funding. The NMR spectrometers used
in this research were obtained through Birmingham Science
City: Innovative Uses for Advanced Materials in the Modern
World (West Midlands Centre for Advanced Materials Project 2),
with support from Advantage West Midlands (AWM) and part
funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF).
Notes and references
13 See ESI† for a complete list of conditions with references.
‡ In order to gain further insight into the stability issues, the minor 14 We have been unable to identify the impurities present in the
(E)-enoate 15 from the Ando-modified Horner–Wadsworth–Emmons
aliphatic region of the NMR spectra of synthetic 1.
c
2298 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2296--2298
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013