192
M.N. Patel et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 29 (2013) 190–193
Fig. 4. Michaelis–Menten Reaction kinetics for the cleavage of plasmid DNA (incuba-
tion time: 100 min): lanes 1–7, pseudo Michaelis–Menten kinetic, at constant DNA
concentration ([DNA]=50 μM) and varying complex concentration ([Complex]=
50–350 μM); lanes 8–14, true Michaelic–Menten kinetic, at constant complex concen-
tration ([Complex]=150) and varying DNA concentration ([DNA]=20–80 μM).
Fig. 2. Agarose gel (1%) of pUC19 (20 μM) at 37 °C in TE buffer (pH 8) in presence of
150 μM complex 1 with increasing incubation time. Lanes 1–7: 50, 100, 150, 200,
250, 300 and 350 min, respectively.
Gel electrophoresis of plasmid DNA in presence of complexes shows
that the complexes are effective DNA cleavage agent. The Michaelis–
Menten kinetic study on plasmid DNA shows rate enhancement ratio
of the complexes in the order of 107 in cleaving DNA over noncatalyzed
DNA. These studies represent the attractive possibility of activating the
cleavage chemistry of covalently bound complexes.
shows the exponential nature of the curves (Fig. 3). The plot of ln(%SC
DNA) versus time is linear, which confirms that the process is pseudo
first-order (Supplementary S.6). The rate constant k1 (7.5×10−5 s−1),
the slope of the linear plot, was obtained using a complex concentration
of 200 μM.
Plasmid DNA cleavage was monitored under pseudo Michaelis–
Menten kinetic conditions using a constant DNA concentration (50 μM)
and varying complex concentration (50–350 μM) (Fig. 4). The kinetic
parameters for the pseudo-Michaelis–Menten conditions were derived
from the plots of kobs versus [Complex] and fit to Eq. (3) (Supplementary
S.1). Under these experimental conditions, values of KM were obtained in
the range of 172–238 μM for all the complexes (Supplementary S.7),
where these values represent pseudo Michaelis–Menten conditions. The
calculated value of complexes fall in the range reported for the cleavage
of DNA by other metal complexes (1.0×102–3.0×102 μM) [22,23].
The rate enhancements obtained for complexes 1–4 are 2.7×107,
3.0×107, 3.2×107, 3.2×107 respectively, over the non-catalyzed DNA
(k=3.6×10−8 h−1 at 37 °C) [23] clearly reveals the efficiency of the
complexes to cleave the double-stranded DNA.
Acknowledgments
Authors thank the Head of the Department of Chemistry Sardar Patel
University, India for making it convenient to work in laboratory and the
CSIR, India for providing financial support under “CSIR-Senior Research
Fellowship” scheme.
Appendix A. Supplementary material
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at http://
References
Plasmid DNA cleavage was also monitored under true Michaelis–
Menten kinetic conditions using a constant complex concentration
(150 μM) and varying DNA concentration (20–80 μM) (Fig. 4). The
cleavage rate constants kobs were estimated using Eq. (2) (Supplementary
S.1) and then plot of kobs versus [DNA] was drawn. Under the experimen-
tal conditions, values of KM were obtained in the range of 73–87 μM for all
the complexes (Supplementary S.7), which is comparable to the value
reported by Kumbhar et al. [22]. The rate enhancements obtained for
complexes 1–4 are 2.2×107, 2.3×107, 2.7×107 and 2.3×107 respective-
ly, over the non-catalyzed DNA.
In summary, four new metal compounds of Au(III) have been synthe-
sized and characterized. All the compounds are monoionic in nature and
formed by coordination through N of different neutral bidentate ligands.
The UV–vis spectra of complexes in the DMSO and buffer shows that the
complexes convert into their dihydroxy form i.e. [Au(A)(OH)2]+ in the
physiological condition. Also the dihydroxy chromophore is stable for
24 h under the physiological conditions. The complexes show potent
cytotoxic properties against Artemia Cysts and DNA could be the possi-
ble target of the Au(III) complexes. The dihydroxy species of Au(III)
complexes exhibit covalent binding mode of interaction with DNA.
[1] I. Ott, On the medicinal chemistry of gold complexes as anticancer drugs, Coord.
Chem. Rev. 253 (2009) 1670–1681.
[2] K.C. Dash, H. Schmidbauer, Metal Ions in Biological Systems, Marcel Dekker, New
York, 1982.
[3] V. Gandin, A.P. Fernandes, M.P. Rigobello, B. Dani, F. Sorrentino, F. Tisato, M. Bornstedt,
A. Bindoli, A. Sturaro, R. Rella, C. Marzano, Cancer cell death induced by phosphine
gold(I) compounds targeting thioredoxin reductase, Biochem. Pharmacol. 79 (2010)
90–101.
[4] P.J. Sadler, R.E. Sue, The chemistry of gold drugs, Met. Based Drugs 1 (1994)
107–144.
[5] E.A. Pacheco, E.R.T. Tiekink, M.W. Whitehouse, Gold chemistry—applications and
future directions in the life sciences, John Wiley & Sons, 2009.
[6] M. Navarro, C. Hernandez, I. Colmenares, P. Hernandez, M. Fernandez, A. Sierraalta, E.
Marchan, Synthesis and characterization of [Au(dppz)2]Cl3. DNA interaction studies
and biological activity against Leishmania (L) mexicana, J. Inorg. Biochem. 101 (2007)
111–116.
[7] K. Palanichamy, A.C. Ontko, Synthesis, characterization, and aqueous chemistry of
cytotoxic Au(III) polypyridyl complexes, Inorg. Chim. Acta 359 (2006) 44–52.
[8] C. Gabbiani, A. Guerri, M.A. Cinellu, L. Messori, Dinuclear gold(III) complexes as
potential anticancer agents: structure, reactivity and biological profile of a series
of gold(III) oxo-bridged derivatives, Open Crystallogr.J. 3 (2010) 29–40.
[9] G. Marcon, S. Carotti, M. Coronnello, Gold(III) complexes with bipyridyl ligands:
solution chemistry, cytotoxicity, and DNA binding properties, J. Med. Chem. 45
(2002) 1672–1677.
[10] L. Ronconi, C. Marzano, P. Zanello, M. Corsini, G. Miolo, C. Macca, A. Trevisan, D.
Fregona, Gold(III) dithiocarbamate derivatives for the treatment of cancer: solu-
tion chemistry, DNA binding and hemolytic properties, J. Med. Chem. 49 (2006)
1648–1657.
[11] L. Messori, G. Marcon, P. Orioli, Gold(III) compounds as new family of anticancer
drugs, Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 1 (2003) 177–187.
[12] M.N. Patel, B.S. Bhatt, P.A. Dosi, Topoisomerase inhibition, nucleolytic and electrolytic
contribution on DNA binding activity exerted by biological active analogue of coordina-
tion compounds, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 166 (2012) 1949–1968.
[13] L. Messori, P. Orioli, C. Tempi, G. Marcon, Interactions of selected gold(III) com-
plexes with Calf Thymus DNA, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 281 (2001)
352–360.
[14] B.N. Meyer, N.R. Ferrigni, J.E. Putnam, J.B. Jacobsen, D.E. Nicholsand, J.L. Mclaughlin,
Brine shrimp; a convenient general bioassay for active plant constituents, Planta
Med. 45 (1982) 31–34.
[15] B. Jaki, J. Orjala, H.R. Bürji, O. Sticher, Biological screening of cyanobacteria for
antimicrobial and molluscicidal activity, brine shrimp lethality and cytotoxicity,
Pharm. Biol. 37 (1999) 138–143.
[16] Y. Lu, Y.P. Zhao, C.X. Fu, Biological activities of extracts from a naturally wild kiwifruit,
Actinidia macrosperma, Afr. J. Agric. Res. 6 (2011) 2231–2234.
[17] J.M. Mbaria Nguta, D.W. Gakuya, P.K. Gathumbi, J.D. Kabasa, S.G. Kiama, Cytotoxicity
of antimalarial plant extracts from Kenyan biodiversity to the brine shrimp, Artemia
salina L. (Artemiidae), Drugs Ther. Studies 2 (2012) 64–67.
Fig. 3. Decrease in the SC form and formation of the OC and L forms of pUC19 DNA in
presence of the complex 1 (150 μM) with incubation time.