from an inexpensive commodity source, such as alcohols
and ammonia, would be a highly valuable process.
two examples (15% and 30% yield) of nitrile synthesis
from aldehyde and ammonia.13a The poor yields might be
attributed to the formation of Werner’s amine complexes
Cu[NH3]4X2. Subsequently, Capdevielle reported that aro-
matic nitriles could be obtained in high yield from benzalde-
hyde derivatives and ammonium chloride using stoichiomet-
ric (1.5À2.0 equiv) copper powder in pyridine.13b In addition,
enolizable aliphatic aldehydes were not tolerated.
Scheme 1. Catalytic Aerobic Oxidation of Alcohols to Nitriles
Table 1. Preliminary Study of Cu/TEMPO Catalyst System for
the Synthesis of Nitriles from Alcoholsa
Intrigued by the old industrial method of ammoxida-
tion,9 we were interested in developing a highly practical
method for converting alcohols to nitriles using molecular
oxygen and ammonia. To the best of our knowledge, direct
conversion of alcohols to nitriles using oxygen and ammo-
nia only existed in the heterogeneous catalysis paradigm
(Scheme 1). Recently, Mizuno reported a direct nitrile
synthesis from alcohols using a heterogeneous Ru(OH)x/
Al2O3 catalyst and excess aqueous ammonia under 6 atm
of air pressure at 120 °C.10c Ishida et al. subsequently dis-
closed a parallel process using metal oxide (MnO2) under
pressured oxygen (0.85 MPa) and NH3 gas (0.5 MPa) at
100 °C.10a Challenges for this particular transformation
include (1) the formation of catalytically dead Werner
complexes in the presence of ammonia and homogeneous
transition metals; (2) difficulty in undergoing “NÀH acti-
vation” due to the high strength of the NÀH bond of
ammonia (107 kcal/mol);11 and (3) a double dehydrogena-
tive mechanism which requires strong oxidative condi-
tions, preventing an efficient aerobic catalytic cycle.
Cu/TEMPO has been extensively studied as an efficient
catalyst for alcohol oxidation to the aldehyde.12 Recently,
a simple Cu/TEMPO/NMI/bpy system was developed
by Stahl et al. that permitted room temperature aerobic
oxidation of alcohols to aldehydes.12e We decided to
explore the possibility of double dehydrogenation of alco-
hols to access nitriles directly via in situ aldehyde/imine
formation. However, aerobic oxidation of aldehydes to
nitrilesinthe presenceofammonia and atransition metal is
a challenging task. In 1963, Brackman and Smit reported
entry
Cu
L
add.
none
sol.
conv (%)b
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9c
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr2
CuBr
CuOTf
CuCl
CuI
none
none
bpy
bpy
bpy
bpy
bpy
bpy
bpy
DMSO
DMSO
DMSO
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
N.R.
45
TEMPO
TEMPO
TEMPO
TEMPO
TEMPO
TEMPO
TEMPO
TEMPO
64
80
86
93
91
100
100
CuI
a Reaction conditions: 1.0 mmol of alcohol, 5 mol % Cu, 5 mol %
ligand, 5 mol % additive, 2.0 equiv of aqueous ammonia (25À28%,
w/w), 2 mL of solvent, oxygen balloon, 55 °C, 24 h. b Determined by GC
using biphenyl as an internal standard. c The reaction was carried out at
room temperature for 24 h.
Our initial investigation involved mixing benzyl alcohol,
a copper salt, a ligand, an additive, and 2 equiv of aqueous
ammonia under an oxygen atmosphere. After the reac-
tion mixture was stirred for 24 h at 55 °C, aliquots were
taken and conversions were determined by GC (Table 1;
for complete condition screening, see the Supporting
Information). Gratifyingly, aqueous ammonia did not
inhibit the initial aldehyde formation and we were able to
eliminate NMI required in the Stahl protocol without
effecting the catalytic activity. Preliminary screening re-
vealed the following characteristics: (1) Cu alone did not
catalyze nitrile formation; (2) TEMPO was essential for
both alcohol-to-aldehyde and aldehyde-to-nitrile steps; (3)
a chelating bpy ligand significantly improved nitrile for-
mation by accelerating the aldehyde formation step. Cu(I)
and Cu(II) salts were equally effective.14 By using CuI, we
were able to achieve a 100% GC yield.
€
(9) (a) Martin, A.; Kalevaru, N. V.; Lucke, B.; Sans, J. Green Chem.
2002, 4, 481. (b) Denton, W. I.; Bishop, R. B.; Caldwell, H. P.; Chapman,
H. D. Ind. Eng. Chem. 1950, 42, 796.
(10) (a) Ishida, T.; Watanabe, H.; Takei, T.; Hamasaki, A.; Tokunaga,
M.; Haruta, M. Appl. Catal. A: Gen. 2012, 425À426, 85. (b) Yamaguchi, K.;
Kobayashi, H.; Oishi, T.; Mizuno, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 544.
(c) Yamaguchi, K.; He, J.; Oishi, T.; Mizuno, N. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16,
7199. (d) Oishi, T.; Kazuya, Y.; Mizuno, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009,
48, 6286.
(11) (a) Klinkenberg, J. L.; Hartwig, J. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 86. (b) van der Vlugt, J. I. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 2302.
(12) (a) Brackman, W.; Gaasbeek, C. J. Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas.
To our delight, the reaction at room temperature was
equally effective (Table 1, entry 9). The substrate scope
was explored under the optimized ambient conditions.
Good-to-quantitative yields were achieved for a broad
(13) (a) Brackman, W.; Smit, P. J. Recl. Trav. Chim. 1963, 82, 757. (b)
Capdevielle, P.; Lavigne, A.; Maumy, M. Synthesis 1989, 6, 451. There
was one example using substoichiometric copper in this literature, where
0.7 equiv of copper accomplished an 83% yield.
(14) There was a greater rate difference between Cu(I) and Cu(II) for
the alcohol oxidation to aldehyde step in Stahl’s studies; see ref 12e.
ꢀ
1966, 85, 257. (b) Semmelhack, M. F.; Schmid, C. R.; Cortes, D. A.;
Chou, C. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3374. (c) Mannam, S.;
Alamsetti, S. K.; Sekar, G. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2007, 349, 2253. (d) Figiel,
P. J.; Sibaouih, A.; Ahmad, J. U.; Nieger, M.; Raisanen, M. T.; Leskela,
M.; Repo, T. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 2625. (e) Hoover, J. M.; Stahl,
S. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 16901.
€ €
€
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX