H. Kikuchi et al. / Tetrahedron 69 (2013) 3536e3542
3541
and evaporated. The residue was chromatographed over silica gel
eluted by hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1) to give 4a (1.2 mg, 1.4 mol,
72%). Data for 4a: colorless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3)
7.41e7.43 (2H, m), 7.36e7.39 (2H, m), 7.29e7.35 (6H, m),
Data for the mixture of 8 and 9: colorless amorphous solid; 1H NMR
and 13C NMR data were identical to those of 8 and 9 reported in the
literature;13 HRFABMS m/z 460.3895 [M]þ (460.3914 calcd for
C30H52O3).
m
d
4.94e4.97 (1H, m), 4.74e4.76 (1H, m), 4.73 (1H, s), 4.72 (1H, s), 4.52
(1H, dd, J¼11.3, 4.7 Hz), 3.68 (1H, dd, J¼11.9, 4.2 Hz), 3.62 (1H, dd,
J¼11.9, 2.8 Hz), 3.44 (3H, s), 3.41 (3H, s), 2.09 (3H, s), 1.98e2.02 (2H,
m), 1.91 (3H, s), 1.17e1.86 (18H, m), 1.15 (3H, s), 1.14 (3H, s), 1.08 (1H,
dd, J¼12.7, 2.1 Hz), 0.90 (3H, s), 0.83 (3H, s), 0.82 (3H, s), 0.80 (3H, s),
0.55 (3H, s); HRFABMS: m/z 872.5081 [M]þ (872.5071 calcd for
C52H72O11).
3.11. Ex vivo Drosophila culture assay
The detailed procedure was described previously.5b Briefly, the
abdominal cavity of third-instar larva was opened using fine pinc-
ettes. Individual whole larval tissues were cultured in Schneider’s
Drosophila medium (Gibco-BRL, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing
20% fetal bovine serum (Valley Biomedical, Winchester, VA) and 1%
antibiotics/antimycotics (Gibco-BRL) in each well of a 96-well plate
at 25 ꢀC. For each condition, six females were cultured to produce six
replicates. The test compounds were dissolved in DMSO and added
to the culture medium. To determine the effects of the test com-
pounds on the innate immune response, Dpt-lacZ larvae were cul-
tured in the presence of 100 ng/mL peptidoglycans from Escherichia
coli (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA) and the compound at 25 ꢀC for 12 h.
3.7. Conversion of 1 into di-(S)-a-methoxyphenylacetate 4b
In the same manner as the synthesis of 4a, compound 4b
(1.2 mg, 1.4 mol, 88%) was synthesized from 1. Data for 4b: col-
orless oil; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3)
7.43e7.45 (4H, m), 7.29e7.38
m
d
(6H, m), 4.89e4.91 (1H, m), 4.72 (1H, s), 4.69 (1H, s), 4.49 (1H, dd,
J¼11.6, 4.3 Hz), 4.11 (1H, dd, J¼12.1, 2.3 Hz), 4.02e4.07 (2H, m), 3.40
(3H, s), 3.38 (3H, s), 2.03 (3H, s), 2.02 (3H, s), 1.94e1.99 (2H, m),
1.14e1.81 (18H, m), 1.03 (1H, dd, J¼12.7, 2.0 Hz), 0.94 (3H, s), 0.92
(3H, s), 0.91 (3H, s), 0.84 (3H, s), 0.68 (3H, s), 0.65 (3H, s), 0.42 (3H,
s); HRFABMS: m/z 872.5032 [M]þ (872.5071 calcd for C52H72O11).
The cultured individual larvae were sonicated with 200 mL reaction
buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, and 1 mM
MgCl2) using an Ultrasonic Processor (Misonix, New York, NY). After
centrifugation (10,000ꢂg) at 4 ꢀC for 10 min, supernatant was har-
vested, and b-galactosidase activity and total protein amount of su-
pernatant were determined as previously described.5a
Galactosidase activity was normalized to total protein amount.
b-
3.8. Conversion of 1 into pentaol 5
To a solution of 1 (2.2 mg, 3.8 mmol) in methanol (1 mL) was
added sodium methoxide (5.0 mg). After being stirred for 3 h at
room temperature, the mixture was acidified with Dowex 50w (Hþ
form) until the pH reached 2, and filtered. Then, the filtrate was
evaporated, and the residue was chromatographed over silica gel
3.12. Measurement of cytotoxicity and luciferase activity
Drosophila S2 cells and S2att-luc cells, harboring luciferase re-
porter gene driven by attacin promoter,12 were cultured in
Schneider’s Drosophila medium (Gibco-BRL) supplemented with
10% FBS and 1% antibiotics/antimycotics at 25 ꢀC. Cytotoxicity was
measured using the colorimetric thiazoyl blue conversion assay
using WST-8 solution (nacalai tesque) as described previously.5b To
determine the effect of compounds on attacin expression via IMD
pathway, S2att-luc cells were pre-treated with compounds for 1.5 h
and stimulated by 100 ng/mL peptidoglycans. At 8 h after stimu-
lation, cells were lysed with Glo-lysis buffer (Promega), and lucif-
erase activities were measured by One-Glo (Promega).
eluted by ethyl acetate/methanol (9:1) to give 5 (1.8 mg, 3.7
97%). Data for 5: colorless amorphous solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CD3OD) 3.96e4.02 (2H, m), 3.57e3.65 (2H, m), 3.14e3.18 (1H, m),
mmol,
d
1.98e2.19 (5H, m), 1.42e1.79 (14H, m), 1.20e1.26 (1H, m), 1.18 (3H,
s), 1.17 (3H, s), 1.05 (1H, dd, J¼12.3, 1.7 Hz), 1.02 (3H, s), 0.98 (3H, s),
0.90 (3H, s), 0.82 (3H, s), 0.80 (3H, s); HRFABMS: m/z 493.3901
[MþH]þ (493.3890 calcd for C30H53O5).
3.9. Conversion of 1 into tetraacetate 6
To a solution of 1 (1.2 mg, 2.1
mmol) in pyridine (1 mL) was
Acknowledgements
added acetic anhydride (300 L). After being stirred for 5 h at room
m
temperature, the reaction mixture was evaporated. The residue was
chromatographed over silica gel eluted by hexane/ethyl acetate
We thank Dr. J.L. Imler for Att-luc reporter construct. This work
was supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No.
23710247) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture of Japan, and the SUNBOR GRANT from the Suntory In-
stitute for Bioorganic Research.
(3:2) to give 6 (0.6 mg, 0.9
m
mol, 37%). Data for 6: colorless amor-
phous solid; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
d
4.91 (1H, dt, J¼10.9,
3.0 Hz), 4.87 (1H, dd, J¼10.6, 3.0 Hz), 4.49 (1H, dd, J¼11.8, 4.5 Hz),
4.21 (1H, dd, J¼11.8, 2.6 Hz), 4.11 (1H, dd, J¼11.8, 5.1 Hz), 2.09 (3H,
s), 2.06 (3H, s), 2.05 (3H, s), 2.03 (3H, s), 1.23e1.95 (20H, m), 1.20
(6H, s), 1.14 (1H, dd, J¼12.5, 2.1 Hz), 1.00 (3H, s), 0.91 (3H, s), 0.88
(6H, s), 0.72 (3H, s); HRFABMS: m/z 660.4223 [MþH]þ (660.4233
calcd for C38H60O9).
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
These data include MOL files and InChiKeys of the most important
compounds described in this article.
3.10. Synthesis of the mixture of inoterpene A (8) and B (9)
To a solution of lanosterol (7) (31.6 mg, 74.2 mmol) in acetone/
acetonitrile/water (1:1:1) (4 mL) was added trimethylamine N-
References and notes
oxide (15.9 mg) and 4% osmium tetroxide solution in water
(100 mL). After being stirred for 24 h at room temperature, the re-
1. Sleigh, M. A. Protozoa and Other Protists; Cambridge University Press: London,
1989.
2. Van der Auwera, G.; De Baere, R.; Van de Peer, Y.; De Rijk, P.; Van den Broeck, I.;
De Wachter, R. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1995, 12, 671e678.
3. (a) William, F. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2008, 9, 385e402; (b) McDonald, B. A.; Linde, C.
Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2002, 40, 349e379.
4. (a) McMorris, T. C.; Barksdale, A. W. Nature 1967, 215, 320e321; (b) Arsenault,
G. P.; Biemann, K.; Barksdale, A. W.; McMorris, T. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90,
5635e5636; (c) Green, D. M.; Edwards, J. A.; Barksdale, A. W.; McMorris, T. C.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1971, 27, 1199e1203.
action mixture was poured into 10% sodium thiosulfate solution,
and extracted with ethyl acetate three times. The combined organic
layer was washed with saturated sodium bicarbonate solution and
brine, dried over sodium sulfate, and evaporated. The residue was
chromatographed over silica gel eluted by hexane/ethyl acetate
(1:1) to give the 1:1 mixture of 8 and 9 (8.5 mg, 18.5 mmol, 25%).