1942
J. J. Li et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 1938–1942
SNAr product 22 was produced in 23% yield, we were unable to per-
form the similar transformation with aliphatic amines. Heterocy-
clic ring nitrogen can also be used as nucleophiles for this
reaction. Both 2-methylimidazole (entry 6) and 2-methyl-1H-
benzo[d]imidazole (entry 7) react readily with 9b to provide only
the mono-SNAr products 23 and 24 in good to excellent yields.
When sodium malonate (entry 8) was prepared by the treatment
of diethyl malonate with 1 equiv of NaH, 2-(5-(t-butylsulfonyl)pyr-
azin-2-yl)malonate (25) was isolated as the major product in 86%
yield even when 2 equiv of nucleophile was employed.
zine (9a), 2,5-bis(t-butylsulfonyl)-pyrazine (9b), and 2,5-bis(toly-
lsulfonyl)pyrazine (9c). The respective SNAr reactions of these
have been explored with a variety of nucleophiles. When 2 equiv
of thiols or thiophenols were employed as the nucleophiles, bis-
thiopyrazines were obtained exclusively. However, phenols or alk-
oxides only gave rise to the corresponding mono-substituted aryl-
oxy- or alkoxy-sulfonylpyrazines in excellent yields because the
pyrazine is deactivated by the oxygen atom. A carbon nucleophile
prepared by treating malonate with NaH also produced the corre-
sponding mono-sulfonylpyrazines even though 2 equiv of the
nucleophile was used. Finally, the SNAr reaction of aliphatic amines
and anilines with 2,5-bis-(sulfonyl)pyrazines provided the mono-
anilino-sulfonylpyrazines in poor to moderate yields.
We further investigated the arylsulfonyl-pyrazines using 2,5-
bis-(tolylsulfonyl)-pyrazine (9c) as an example. As shown in
Scheme 5, double SNAr displacement of 2,5-bis-bromopyrazine
(7) gave di-sulfide 8c. Same oxidation procedure using hydrogen
peroxide in glacial acetic acid produced bis-sulfone 9c. We also at-
tempted to prepare 9c in one step by treating 2,5-bisbromopyr-
azine (7) with 2 equiv of sodium sulfinate with no success.12
With substrate 9c in hand, its SNAr reactions with several differ-
ent nucleophiles were explored. Reaction of 2,5-ditosylsulfonyl-
pyrazine (9c) with pyridin-3-ol under typical conditions afforded
2-(pyridin-3-yloxy)-5-tosylsulfonylpyrazine (26) in excellent yield
(Table 3, entry 1), while a much lower yield of 2-(pyridin-2-yloxy)-
5-tosylsulfonylpyrazine (27) was obtained with pyridin-2-ol (entry
2). The lower yield resulted from the formation of 2,5-bis(pyridin-
2-yloxy)pyrazine (structure not shown) as a major side product. In
addition to pyridinols, we also evaluated o-cresol, a relatively ste-
rically hindered phenol. This phenol (entry 3) underwent smooth
mono-SNAr substitution to furnish 2-(o-tolyloxy)-5-tosylsulfonyl-
pyrazine (28) in nearly quantitative yield. This methodology has
also been extended to aminopyridines with limited success. In gen-
eral, multiple substitution products from aminopyridines were ob-
served in the crude reaction mixture as shown by LC–MS analysis,
thus resulting in poor yields. For example, both pyridin-4-amine
(entry 4) and N-methylpyridin-4-amine (entry 5) furnished the de-
sired mono-substituted products 29 and 30 in roughly 30% yield.
When pyridin-2-amine was utilized, only a trace amount of the de-
sired mono-substituted product was formed. As aminopyridines
are common building blocks for medicinal chemistry research, fu-
ture work will be directed toward improving the efficiency of the
reactions with 2,5-ditosylsulfonylpyrazine involving aminopyri-
dines. When sodium malonate was prepared by the treatment of
diethyl malonate with 1 equiv of NaH (entry 6), 2-(5-(tolylsulfo-
nyl)pyrazin-2-yl)malonate (31) was isolated as the predominant
product in 89% yield even when 2 equiv of nucleophile was
employed.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (full experimental detail, as well as charac-
terization of all compounds) associated with this article can be
References and notes
1. Culy, C.; Castaner, J.; Bayes, M. Drugs Future 2003, 28, 640–646.
2. Greener, B. S.; Millan, D. S. In Modern Drug Synthesis; Li, J. J., Johnson, D. S., Eds.;
Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, 2010; pp 99–110.
3. Andrews, D.; Finlay, M. R.; Green, C.; Jones, C.; Oza, V. WO2006095159, 2006.
4. Asaki, T.; Hamamoto, T.; Sugiyama, Y.; Kuwano, K.; Kuwabara, K. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. 2007, 15, 6692–6704.
5. Tsutsumi, H.; Tabuchi, S.; Minagawa, M.; Akahane, A. WO 2005095384, 2005.
6. Kato, S.; Shimano, S.; Hayaoka, T.; Masui, A. EP 220857, 1987.
7. Yu, B.; Liu, A.-H.; He, L.-N.; Li, B.; Diao, Z.-F.; Li, Y.-N. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 957–
962.
8. Elslager, E. F.; Johnson, J. L.; Werbel, L. M. J. Med. Chem. 1981, 24, 1001–1003.
9. Typical experimental procedure: To a suspension of 2,5-bis(methylsulfonyl)-
pyrazine (9a, 500 mg, 2.12 mmol) in acetonitrile (5 mL) was added para-
fluorophenol (593 mg, 5.29 mmol, 2.5 equiv) and K2CO3 (877 mg, 6.35 mmol,
3 equiv) The resulting suspension was refluxed for 2 h and cooled to rt. The
suspension was filtered, the solvent was removed in vacuo and the residue was
purified using a column eluting with 30–50% EtOAc in hexanes to give the
desired product 10 as a white and highly crystalline solid (512 mg, 90%).
Rf = 0.51 (1:1 hexanes/EtOAc); 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 8.69 (s, 1H), 8.44 (s,
1H), 7.09 (m, 4H), 3.15 (s, 3H); 19F NMR (282 MHz, CDCl3) d: 116.2; 13C NMR
(75 MHz, CDCl3) d: 165.6, 164.0 (d), 148.6, 141.4 (d), 137.7 (d), 121.7 (d), 117.4
(d); MS (ESI+) m/z 269.11 (M+1).
10. Zhang, W.; Haight, A. R.; Ford, K. L.; Parekh, S. I. Synth. Commun. 2001, 31, 725–
730.
11. Colbon, P. J. J.; Foster, A. C.; Giles, M. E.; Patel, Z.; Singleton, J. T. J. Heterocycl.
Chem. 2008, 45, 1451–1456.
12. (a) Maloney, K. M.; Kuethe, J. T.; Linn, K. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 102–105; (b)
Desideri, N.; Manna, F.; Stein, M. L.; Arena, F.; Luraschi, E.; Cifra, E. Farmaco
1980, 35, 902–912.
In summary, we have prepared the previously unknown 2,5-
bis-(sulfonyl)-pyrazines including 2,5-bis-(methysulfonyl)-pyra-