ChemComm
Communication
measured for 112 vesicles was 15.5 Æ 2.7 nm (Fig. 2b), and we see This sub-nm-resolution SEM technique provides a new single
hints of surface morphology. molecule-level approach to the analysis of nm-sized organic
The first few scans (ca. 3 min at a beam current of 25 pA) molecules and materials,15 supplementing the AFM technology
caused a change in the surface structure (e.g. dehydration of that gives much lower point resolution and the conventional
protein), which now shows bright and protruded areas, and optics-based microscopy that is useful for molecular ensemble
dark areas (Fig. 2b and c). The histogram of the bright areas analysis. The subnanometer-resolution electron microscopic
(circled in red in Fig. 2c) showed two peaks at 30–45 nm2 and imaging of small molecules and proteins is an emerging
65–75 nm2 (analyzed for those located nearly in the center of methodology,16 and the method reported here will provide a
the vesicle image, Fig. 2d). The former is close to the projection useful platform for future exploration of the potential of SEM.
area of a single molecule of avidin (25–30 nm2),13 and the latter
This work was supported by KAKENHI on Specially Promoted
to that of two molecules. Therefore, we consider that the bright Research (22000008) to E.N. and Innovative Areas ‘‘Coordination
areas are due to individual avidin molecules. From these data, Programming’’ (Area 2107, 24108710) to K.H. from MEXT, Japan.
we can estimate that at least ca. 20 avidin molecules are K.M. thanks the Japan Society for Promotion of Science for a
attached to the vesicle surface.
predoctoral fellowship.
Fig. 2e illustrates the detrimental effects on the image quality
of the conventional Pt/Pd coating (1 nm) of the specimen taken
under the same conditions as those used for Fig. 2a. The metal
coating covered the avidin molecules and the ITO microcrystals.
The coating increased the average vesicle radius by 4 nm to
19.7 Æ 2.2 nm (average of 93 vesicles). The average radius of
vesicles after 5 nm Pt/Pd coating increased further to 24.6 Æ
3.4 nm (ESI†). Therefore, nonconducting substrates such as
mica are unsuitable for nanometer-resolution SEM imaging
because they inevitably need a metal coating. An SEM using
a nonmonochromatic electron source (electron beam with
>0.65 eV energy spread) produced the image in Fig. 2f that has
an image contrast too low to be useful.
The SEM measurement of the biotinylated vesicle showed a
radius of 11.7 Æ 1.6 nm, which agrees very well with the
hydrodynamic radius determined by DLS (11.6 Æ 0.1 nm, see
above). Thus, we consider that the SEM measurement provides
a reliable alternative for the determination of the size of
nanoparticles. In contrast, AFM imaging of the vesicles showed
a radius larger by the size of the probe (i.e., 2 nm), and the
conventional SEM conditions using Pt/Pd coating also gave a
size larger than the real size (see above).
In summary, we have coated the surface of a nanocapsule
with avidin molecules through stepwise noncovalent and
covalent modifications with good control and precise analysis
of each functionalization step. The alkynylated fullerene
formed a vesicle, which withstood the conditions of chemical
reactions and chromatographic purification, and served as a
carrier for drugs. We have found that the combined use of a
superhydrophilic ITO/glass as a substrate and the low-accelerating-
voltage SEM provides a viable method for imaging nonconducting
nanometer-scale objects and proteins with high precision and
surface sensitivity. ITO/glass is frequently used in organic electro-
Notes and references
1 (a) D. Peer, J. M. Karp, S. Hong, O. C. Farokhzad, R. Margalit and
R. Langer, Nat. Nanotechnol., 2007, 2, 751; (b) S. Ganta,
H. Devalapally, A. Shahiwala and M. Amiji, J. Controlled Release,
2008, 126, 187; (c) J. Voskuhl and B. J. Ravoo, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009,
38, 495; (d) B. Worsdorfer, K. J. Woycechowsky and D. Hilvert,
Science, 2011, 331, 589.
2 T. Ogura, PLoS One, 2012, 7, e46904.
3 S. Q. Zhou, C. Burger, B. Chu, M. Sawamura, N. Nagahama,
M. Toganoh, U. E. Hackler, H. Isobe and E. Nakamura, Science,
2001, 291, 1944.
4 R. Young, S. Henstra, J. Chmelik, T. Dingle, A. Mangnus, G. van Veen
and I. Gestmann, Proc. SPIE, 2009, 737803.
5 Y. Matsuo and E. Nakamura, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3016.
6 (a) V. V. Rostovtsev, L. G. Green, V. V. Fokin and K. B. Sharpless,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 259; (b) C. W. Tornøe,
C. Christensen and M. Meldal, J. Org. Chem., 2002, 67, 3057;
(c) M. Meldal and C. W. Tornøe, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2952.
7 (a) S. Cavalli, A. R. Tipton, M. Overhand and A. Kros, Chem.
Commun., 2006, 3193; (b) F. S. Hassane, B. Frisch and F. Schuber,
Bioconjugate Chem., 2006, 17, 849; (c) C. Schatz, S. Louguet, J.-F.
Le Meins and S. Lecommandoux, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 2572.
8 H. Isobe, K. Cho, N. Solin, D. B. Werz, P. H. Seeberger and
E. Nakamura, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 4611.
9 (a) T. Homma, K. Harano, H. Isobe and E. Nakamura, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 1665; (b) T. Homma, K. Harano, H. Isobe and
E. Nakamura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 6364.
10 C. M. Santos, A. Kumar, W. Zhang and C. Cai, Chem. Commun., 2009,
2854.
11 K. Sivakumar, F. Xie, B. M. Cash, S. Long, H. N. Barnhill and
Q. Wang, Org. Lett., 2004, 6, 4603.
12 (a) G. Russell-Jones, K. McTavish, J. McEwan, J. Rice and
D. Nowotnik, J. Inorg. Biochem., 2004, 98, 1625; (b) J. Chen,
S. Chen, X. Zhao, L. V. Kuznetsova, S. S. Wong and I. Ojima,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 16778.
13 B. Steiger, C. Padeste, A. Grubelnik and L. Tiefenauer, Electrochim.
Acta, 2003, 48, 761.
14 H. Pluk, D. J. Stokes, B. Lich, B. Wieringa and J. Fransen, J. Microsc.,
2009, 233, 353.
15 H. Yabu, M. Kanahara, M. Shimomura, T. Arita, K. Harano,
E. Nakamura, T. Higuchi and H. Jinnai, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces,
2013, DOI: 10.1021/am4003149.
nics research, but it has seldom been used for biological imaging 16 (a) E. Nakamura, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 236;
(b) M. Koshino, T. Tanaka, N. Solin, K. Suenaga, H. Isobe and
E. Nakamura, Science, 2007, 316, 853; (c) K. Harano, T. Homma,
Y. Niimi, M. Koshino, K. Suenaga, L. Leibler and E. Nakamura, Nat.
except for one report on micrometer-resolution SEM imaging of
cultured cells.14 We found that the ITO substrate is useful
for imaging individual objects that tend to aggregate in water.
Mater., 2012, 11, 877.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3525--3527 3527