Journal of the American Chemical Society
Communication
Similarly, native H3S10ADPr could be generated by ligation of
an H3(1−14)S10ADPr synthetic peptide α-thioester with a
recombinant H3(15−135) containing an A15C mutation,
followed by desulfurization.
a faster-migrating species that corresponds to the unmodified
MN (Figure 2e), which indicates that the ADP-ribosylated
MNs contain the native α-anomeric serine-ADP-ribose link-
age.17 In addition, all MNs were tested in a fluorescence-based
thermal stability assay (Figure S4).27 The ADP-ribosylated
MNs exhibited a melting temperature similar to that of the
unmodified MN, further indicating that the presence of the
ADP-ribose moiety does not affect proper nucleosome
assembly or thermal stability.
To prepare the requisite ADP-ribosylated peptide α-
thioesters, we designed a modified ‘on-resin pyrophosphate
formation’ strategy,16,17 as depicted in Figure 2a. A hydrazine
linker, a thioester surrogate, was loaded on a trityl resin.21
Standard Fmoc-based SPPS was used to synthesize the peptide
sequence, in which the phosphoribosylated serine derivative 1
incorporated at the appropriate position (S6 for H2B, S10
for H3). The phosphate group in compound 1 is protected
with allyl moieties, which enabled Pd-catalyzed selective
deprotection of the phosphate following peptide chain
synthesis. Subsequently, the pyrophosphate bond was formed
on-resin through a reaction between the free phosphate and
the Boc-protected adenosine-phosphoramidite 2 (see Support-
oxidation. The 2-cyanoethyl group was removed by DBU, and
subsequent cleavage and side-chain deprotection with TFA
yielded the ADP-ribosylated peptide hydrazide. Hydrazides are
often converted to thioesters via an acyl azide intermediate
through treatment with nitrous acid;21 however, the adenine
moiety contains an aromatic amine and is not compatible with
such oxidizing conditions. Therefore, we employed a recent,
milder method in which the peptide hydrazide is reacted with
acetylacetone (acac) to provide an acyl pyrazole intermedi-
ate.22 This active species further reacts with 4-mercaptophenyl-
acetic acid (MPAA), generating the corresponding thioester.
The overall synthetic workflow provided highly pure ADP-
ribosylated peptide α-thioesters: H2B(1−16)S6ADPr and
H3(1−14)S10ADPr (Figure S1), in 26% and 12% yield,
respectively.
Following successful synthesis of the ADP-ribosylated
peptide α-thioesters, we turned to the preparation of full-
length ADP-ribosylated histones. The N-terminal cysteine-
containing fragments H2B(17−125)A17C and H3(15−135)A15C
were expressed in Escherichia coli as reported previously.23,24
Native chemical ligation of the peptide thioesters with the
corresponding recombinant fragments, followed by free-
radical-mediated desulfurization of the cysteine ligation “scar”
proceeded smoothly, affording the native full-length ADP-
ribosylated proteinsH2BS6ADPr and H3S10ADPr (Figures
Next, we utilized the modified histone proteins for the
reconstitution of ADP-ribosylated chromatin substrates,
starting with mononucleosomes (MNs). To this end, we
refolded three different ADP-ribosylated histone octamer
complexes, which contained either ADP-ribosylated H2B,
ADP-ribosylated H3, or both, in addition to a control octamer
complex in which all histones are unmodified. The various
octamers were mixed with the “Widom 601” nucleosome-
positioning DNA sequence25 and salt gradient dialysis was
employed to reconstitute MNs. Analysis by native poly-
acrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) indicated that the
bulky, anionic ADP-ribose moiety did not impede efficient MN
formation, although, as expected, the modified MNs migrate
slightly slower compared to the unmodified MN (Figures 2e
and S3). To evaluate the authenticity of the ADP-ribosylated
MNs, we treated them with the ADP-ribosylhydrolase, ARH3,
which removes the ADP-ribose mark from serine residues.26
Treatment with ARH3 converted all ADP-ribosylated MNs to
In addition to MNs, the modified histones were utilized to
prepare ADP-ribosylated 12-mer nucleosome arrays; such
reagents are useful for gathering information about the
regulation of chromatin folding and compaction.28,29 To this
end, the various histone octamer complexes were mixed with a
DNA template that harbors 12 copies of the “Widom 601”
sequence, separated by a 35-bp linker DNA. Salt gradient
dialysis and subsequent Mg2+-induced precipitation provided
pure 12-mer arrays (Figure 2f). Digestion of the arrays to MNs
with BstXI restriction enzyme yielded the expected ADP-
ribosylated MNs, as indicated by native PAGE (Figure 2f).
With the designer chromatin substrates in hand, we set out
to explore the biophysical and biochemical effects of histone
ADP-ribosylation. The first question we aimed to address is
whether the modification alters chromatin higher-order
structure. It is well established that PARP1-mediated poly-
ADP-ribosylation induces chromatin relaxation,30 thereby
facilitating the accessibility of DNA repair factors to the
damage site.31 However, it is unknown whether chromatin
relaxation requires long poly(ADP-ribose) chains or whether
histone mono-ADP-ribosylation is sufficient to impede
chromatin compaction. This question is of particular
importance since mono-ADP-ribosylation is the primary form
of histone ADP-ribosylation in PARP1-dependent DNA
damage signaling.11 Furthermore, it is not clear whether the
site-specificity of histone ADP-ribosylation is important in
determining its potential impact on chromatin decompaction.
To address these questions, we performed sedimentation
velocity analysis of the various 12-mer nucleosome arrays in
the absence or presence of 1 mM Mg2+ ions. Without Mg2+
supplementation, the various nucleosome arrays adopt an
extended structure and sediment similarly at around 32 S
(Figure 3a). As expected,32 the addition of 1 mM Mg2+ to the
unmodified array induced the formation of a more compact
structure that sediments at 45 S (Figure 3a). Remarkably,
whereas the H3ADPr array behaves similarly to the unmodified
control, the H2BADPr array sediments significantly slower (41
S) upon Mg2+ addition (Figure 3a). The dual-modified ADPr
array is even less compacted and sediments at 36 S, a surprising
result given that the H3ADPr modification on its own has no
obvious effect. Notably, pretreatment of the same batch of
modified arrays with ARH3 resulted in sedimentation behavior
similar to the unmodified control (Figure S5).
To further explore the impact of ADP ribosylation on
chromatin structure, we measured the effect of the
modification on Mg2+-mediated array self-association, as
indicated by the decrease in the material that remained in
the supernatant upon centrifugation.33 As before, we observed
differential behavior depending on which histone the ADP-
ribose mark was located; H3ADPr arrays again behaved
similarly to the unmodified control, whereas attachment of the
modification to H2B inhibited array self-association as
reflected by the higher Mg2+ concentration needed to
precipitate the sample (Figure 3b). Also consistent with the
10849
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 10847−10852