[
F.-J. Jiang et al. / Chinese Chemical Letters 24 (2013) 338–340
339
OH
O
O
HO
OH
O
OH
O
OHO
b
O
O
OH
O
O
HO
O
HO
OH
H N
N
2
O
O
NH
O
O
O
O
O
C
O
a
R
O
R
R
O
HO
OHO
2a-2e
3a-3e
1a-1e
R
-CH
-CH(CH )
-CH Ph
-CH CH COOBu -CH CH COOH
-CH COOBu
R
1
-CH
-CH(CH )
3 2
-CH Ph
2
OH
O
O
HO
O
a
b
c
d
e
OH
3
3
O
NH
3 2
O
O
OH
c
O
2
O
R
1
HO
t
2 2 2 2
OH O
4a-4e
t
-CH COOH
2
2
Scheme 1. The synthesis of compounds 4a–4e. Reagents and conditions: (a) bis(trichloromethyl) carbonate (BTC), pyr, DCM, ꢀ10 8C, 2 h, 1 mol/L HCl, yield 90–95%; (b)
anhydrous THF/DMF, Et3N, 50 8C, yield 40–55%; and (c) TFA, 0 8C, 5–6 h, yield 71–90%.
were obtained. Moreover, auxiliary reagent NPC and its degrada-
tion products were very difficult to remove from the reaction
mixture.
666.5. HRMS: calcd. for C32H30NO15 [M+H]+ 668.1615, found
668.1596. 4d: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
13.06 (brs, 1H),
d
10.46 (brs, 1H), 8.22 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.99 (d, 2H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.13
(s, 1H), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.90 (s, 1H), 5.53 (d, 1H, J = 5.6 Hz),
5.37–5.36 (m, 2H), 4.23 (d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 4.08–4.02 (m, 1H), 3.67
(s, 3H), 2.42–2.36 (m, 2H), 2.08–2.02 (m, 1H), 1.89–1.82 (m, 1H);
ESI-MS (m/z) [M+H]+:650.3, [MꢀH]ꢀ: 648.3. HRMS calcd. for
2.1. The synthetic method and spectra data of the target compounds
The synthetic method: Under N2 atmosphere L-amino acid tert-
butyl ester hydrochloride (2.5 mmol) was treated with pyridine
(0.8 mL) in anhydrous CH2Cl2 (50 mL) at ꢀ10 8C for 15 min, then
3 mL CH2Cl2 solution which contained bis(trichloromethyl)
carbonate (BTC) (3.8 mmol) was added to the mixture. The
reaction mixture was stirred at that temperature for 2 h. Then
the mixture was washed twice with icecold 0.1 mol/L HCl and
saturated NaCl aqueous solution respectively, then dried over
Mg2SO4, filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to obtained amino acid
ester isocyanate (2a–e). Under N2 atmosphere scutellarin methyl
ester (1.37 mmol) was dissolved in 15 mL anhydrous DMF, then
10 mL anhydrous THF solution which contained compounds 2a–e
(2.05 mmol) and Et3N (0.2 mmol) were added to the mixture. The
reaction mixture was stirred at 50 8C for 10 h. After that the solvent
was evaporated in vacuo, the residue was purified by using routine
flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: CHCl3/
MeOH = 15:1–20:1 v/v). The obtained intermediates were further
deprotected by using trifluoroacetic acid at 0 8C – r.t. to obtain the
target compounds (4a–4e).
C
28H28NO17 [M+H]+ 650.1357, found 650.1352. 4e: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6): d13.05(brs, 1H), 10.45 (brs, 1H), 8.30 (d, 1H,
J = 8.4 Hz), 7.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.10 (s, 1H), 6.96 (d, 2H,
J = 8.8 Hz), 6.90 (s, 1H), 5.35 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.36 (m, 1H), 4.22
(d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.37–3.26 (m, 3H), 2.79–2.74 (m,
1H), 2.66–2.62 (m, 1H); ESI-MS (m/z) [M+H]+: 636.3, [MꢀH]ꢀ:
634.3. HRMS: calcd. for C27H26NO17 [M + H]+ 636.1201, found
636.1181.
2.2. UPLC–MS/MS analysis conditions for identification of target
compounds 4a–4e
LC analyses were performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC
instrument coupled to a binary pump, an autosampler, and a
column compartment. The samples were separated on a BEH Cl8
column (2.1 mm ꢁ 50 mm, 1.7
m
m), guarded by an Waters Van
m). The mobile
Guard BEH C18 column (2.1 mm ꢁ 5 mm, 1.7
m
phase consisted of acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid (A)
and water containing 0.1% formic acid (B). The elution gradient
was as follows: 10% A (0ꢀ2 min), 90% A (2ꢀ3 min), 10% A
(3 min). The mobile phase flow rate was 0.35 mL/min, and the
column temperature was set at 45 8C. The injection volume was
Spectra data of compounds 4a–4e: 4a: 1H NMR (400 MHz,
DMSO-d6): d 13.06 (brs, 1H), 10.46 (brs, 1H), 8.23 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz),
7.99 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.13 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 9.2 Hz), 6.92 (s,
1H), 5.37 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.23 (d, 1H, J = 9.6 Hz), 3.67 (s, 3H),
3.53–3.34 (m, 3H), 1.36 (d, 3H, J = 7.6 Hz). ESI-MS (m/z) [M+H]+:
592.3, [MꢀH]ꢀ: 590.3. HRMS: calcd. for C26H26NO15 [M+H]+:
1
m
L.
Mass spectrometry: All the mass experiments were carried out
592.1302, found 592.1290. 4b: 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d
using a Waters ACQUITY TQD (triple quadrupole mass spectrome-
ter) equipped with a Z-spray ESI source and connected to the
Waters ACQUITY UPLC system. The acquisition parameters were:
collision gas, argon (Ar); nebulizing and drying gas, nitrogen (N2);
source temperature, 120 8C; desolvation temperature, 350 8C; cone
gas flow, 50 L/h; desolvation gas flow, 650 L/h; collision gas flow,
0.16 mL/min; capillary voltage, 3.0 kV; Multi Reaction Monitor
(MRM) mode was used, positive ions mode (ESI+) the confirmation
ion pairs are (m/z): 592.0 ! 287 (4a), 620.1 ! 287 (4b),
668.1 ! 287 (4c), 650.1 ! 287 (4d), 636.1 ! 287 (4e) respective-
ly, cone voltage was 40 V, 35 V, 40 V, 35 V, and 35 V respectively.
Collision voltage was 40 V, 30 V, 35 V, 30 V, and 30 V respectively.
13.06 (brs, 1H), 10.46 (brs, 1H), 8.05 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.95 (d, 2H,
J = 8.8 Hz), 7.18 (s, 1H), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.91 (s, 1H), 5.29 (d,
1H, J = 7.6 Hz), 4.36 (d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 3.93–3.90 (m, 1H), 3.67 (s,
3H), 3.37–3.29 (m, 3H), 2.15–2.10 (m, 1H), 0.97–0.95 (m, 6H). ESI-
MS (m/z) [M+H]+: 620.3, [MꢀH]ꢀ: 618.4. HRMS calcd. for
C
28H30NO15 [M+H]+ 620.1615, found 620.1623. 4c: 1H NMR
(400 MHz, DMSO-d6):
d 13.01 (brs, 1H), 10.46 (brs, 1H), 8.24 (d,
1H, J = 8.4 Hz), 7.98 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 7.32–7.24 (m, 5H), 7.12 (s,
1H), 6.97 (d, 2H, J = 8.8 Hz), 6.90 (s, 1H), 5.37 (d, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz), 4.23
(d, 1H, J = 9.2 Hz), 3.67 (s, 3H), 3.36–3.26 (m, 3H), 3.17–3.10 (m,
1H), 2.96–2.91 (m, 1H); ESI-MS (m/z) [M+H]+: 668.3, [MꢀH]ꢀ: