JOURNAL OF
POLYMER SCIENCE
ARTICLE
WWW.POLYMERCHEMISTRY.ORG
commercial products (HPLC grade), which were used without
further purification.
mol), and 30 mL of DMAc were introduced to a round-bot-
tomed 100-mL glass flask equipped with a nitrogen inlet, a
condenser, andꢀa magnetic stirrer. The reaction mixture was
heated to 110 C and maintained at that temperature for 12
h. Then, the reaction mixture was filtered, and the filtrate
was poured into 450 mL of methanol/water (1/5, v/v) solu-
tion under stirring. The precipitate was filtered and recrys-
tallized from acetic anhydride, and then dried in a vacuum
oven at 110 ꢀC. Light yellow crystalꢀs (yield, 80%) were
obtained. Melting point (DSC) was 184 C.
Characterization
NMR measurements were performed using a Varian Inova
600 NMR in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO)-d6, and the chemical
shift was calibrated by setting the chemical shift of DMSO-d6
as 2.49 ppm. Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) scans
were obtained by a Perkin-Elmer DSC 7 in a nitrogen atmos-
phere at a heating rate of 20 ꢀC/min. Dynamic mechanical
analysis (DMA) was performed by a Perkin-Elmer Pyris Dia-
ꢀ
ELEM. ANAL. for C41H31N2O8P: Calcd. C 69.29%, H 4.40%, N
3.94%; Found C 69.09%, H 4.52%, N 3.89%. 1H-NMR (ppm,
DMSO-d6), d ¼ 1.85–1.90 (3H, H14), 3.02–3.12 (2H, H20), 4.83–
mond DMA at a heating rate of 5 C/min. Thermomechanical
analysis (TMA) was performed by a SII TMA/SS6100 at a
ꢀ
heating rate of 5 C/min. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA)
4.95 (2H, H22), 5.65 (1H, H21), 6.88 (1H, H17), 6.95 (2H, H28),
was performed with a Perkin-Elmer Pyris1 at a heating rate
of 20 ꢀC/min in nitrogen and air atmosphere, respectively.
Elemental analysis (C, H, and N) was performed on an Ele-
mentar Vario EL III. The infrared spectra were recorded
using a Nicolet Avatar 320 FTIR spectrophotometer and 32
0
7.08 (4H, H25,28 ), 7.15 (1H, H10), 7.21 (2H, H8,16), 7.32(1H,
H23), 7.38 (1H, H9),7.47 (3H, H4,24), 7.52 (1H, H3),07.76 (1H, H2),
8.07 (1H, H7), 8.18 (1H, H1), 8.26–8.30 (4H, H29,29 ).
Synthesis of (3)
scans were collected with a spectral resolution of 1 cmꢁ1
.
A mixture of 1.5 mL of 37% HCl and 3 mL of 50% aqueous
ethanol was slowly added to a mixture of 5.0 g of (2) (7
mmol), 1.96 g of iron powder (35 mmol), and 15 mL of 50%
aqueous ethanol in a three-necked, 100-mL, round-bottomed
flask equipped with a nitrogen inlet and a magnetic stirrer.
The mixture was stirred under reflux for 3 h, and then 1.3
mL of ammonium hydroxide solution (10 wt %) was slowly
added to this mixture over a 1-h period. The mixture was
hot-filtered, and the filtrate was poured into water. The pre-
cipitate was filtered and dried in a vacuum oven to afford
diamine (3). Light orange crystals ꢀ (yield, 70%) were
obtained. Melting point (DSC) was 103 C.
The flame retardancy of the PEIs was determined by a
UL-94VTM vertical thin test. In that test, an 800 ꢂ 200 sample
was wrapped around a 1/200 mandrel, and then taped on
one end. The mandrel was removed, leaving a cone-shaped
sample that was relatively rigid. The two flame applications
took 3 s each for the UL-94 VTM vertical thin film. After the
first ignition, the flame was removed and the time for the
polymer to self-extinguish (t1) was recorded. Cotton ignition
was noted if polymer dripping occurred during the test.
After cooling, the second ignition was performed on the
same sample and the self-extinguishing time (t2) and
dripping characteristics were recorded. If t1 þ t2 < 10 s
without any dripping, then the polymer was considered to
be a VTM-0 material. If t1 þ t2 was in the range of 10–30 s
without any dripping, then the polymer was considered to
be a VTM-1 material.
ELEM. ANAL. for C41H35N2O4P: Calcd. C 75.68%, H 5.42%, N
4.31%; found C 75.44%, H 5.57%, N 4.28%. 1H-NMR (ppm,
DMSO-d6), d ¼ 1.70 (3H, H14), 4.23 (2H, H20), 4.99 (6H,
0
H20,NH2), 5.82 (1H, H21), 6.37 (1H, H17), 6.57 (4H, H29,29 ),
0
6.65 (4H, H25,28), 6.73 (2H, H28 ), 6.97 (1H, H16), 7.08 (1H,
H10), 7.20(4H, H8,23,24), 7.33 (1H, H9), 7.37 (1H, H4), 7.43
(1H, H3), 7.70(1H, H2), 7.95 (1H, H7), 8.07(1H, H1).
Synthesis of (1)
In brief, 10.81 g of DOPO (0.05 mol), 6.81 g of 4-hydroxyace-
tophenone (0.05 mol), 0.432 g of p-TSA (4 wt % based on
the weight of DOPO), and 6.71 g of 2-allylphenol (0.15 mol)
were introduced into a 100-mL round-bottomed glass flask
equipped with a nitrogenꢀ inlet and a magnetic stirrer. The
mixture was stirred at 60 C for 12 h. After that, the reaction
mixture was cooled to room temperature. The precipitate
was filtered, washed with ethyl acetate, recrystallized by
methanol, and dried at 100 ꢀC in a vacuum oven. White
crystꢀal (yield, 70%) was obtained. Melting point (DSC) was
227 C.
Preparation of (4) and (5)
PEI (4) was prepared by reacting (3) with an equal mole of
ODPA. To
a 100-mL three-neck round-bottomed flask
equipped with a magnetic stirrer, nitrogen inlet, 1.301 g of
(3) (2 mmol), 0.436 g of ODPA (2 mmol), 8.7 g of m-cresol,
and two drops of isoquinoline were added. The mixture was
reacted at 200 ꢀC for 8 h. Then, the viscous solution was
poured into methanol. The precipitate was filtered, dried,
and dissolved in DMAc to afford a 20 wt % solution. The
solution was casted on glass by an automatic film applicator,
and dried at 60 ꢀC (12 h), 100 ꢀC (1 h), 150 ꢀC (1 h), and
200 ꢀC (1 h). Thermosetting PEI (5) was obtained by the
ELEM. ANAL. for C29H25O4P: Calcd. C 74.35%, H 5.38%; Found
1
C 74.25%, H 5.57%. H-NMR (DMSO-d6), d ¼ 1.58 (3H, H14),
3.09 (2H, H20), 4.91 (2H, H22), 5.78 (1H, H21), 6.57 (3H,
H17,25), 6.96 (1H, H16), 7.07–7.12 (4H, H10,23,24), 7.14–7.20
(2H, H4,8), 7.32–7.36 (2H, H3,9), 7.66 (1H, H2), 7.95 (1H, H7),
8.07 (1H, H1), 9.33–9.41 (2H, OH).
ꢀ
thermal curing of (4) at 300 C (1 h).
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Synthesis of (1)
Synthesis of (2)
Briefly, 4.68 g of (1) (0.01 mol), 3.10 g of 4-fluoronitroben-
zene (0.022 mol), 3.04 g of potassium carbonate (0.022
The allyl-containing diphenol (1) was prepared in a one-pot
procedure by the reaction of DOPO, 4-hydroxyacetophenone
in excess 2-allylphenol using p-TSA as catalyst (Scheme 1).
WWW.MATERIALSVIEWS.COM
JOURNAL OF POLYMER SCIENCE, PART A: POLYMER CHEMISTRY 2013, 51, 1734–1741
1735