[Figure 1b]. The dehydrogenation of a C(4);C(5) single
bond to a CdC double bond is one of them. In previous
reports, several oxidants were used such as MnO2, SeO2,
Br2/HOAc, etc.7 However, neither the efficiency nor the
economy meets the green chemistry standards. Recently,
transition-metal catalyzed oxidation in aerobic condition
emerged as a powerful tool for dehydrogenation of C;C
single bond to CdC double bond.8 However, most of the
reactions were carried out in organic solvents and the
catalysts are expensive and unrecyclable. Another essential
is the dehalogenation which represents critical sig-
nificance in improvement of the medicinal properties of
pyridazinones.9 However, the high stability of the aryl
C;Cl bond renders it less reactive. Furthermore, only a few
methods using transition-metal catalysts are reported.10
The traditional catalytic systems can still be improved, as
most suffer from expensive transition-metal systems, poor
selectivity, extreme conditions, ornarrow functional group
tolerance. So far, few Cu-catalyzed dehydrogenations of
C;C bond to CdC bond and Cu-catalyzed dechlorina-
tion in an aerobic and aqueous environment have been
reported.11
In order to combine the three essentials including (i)
functionalization of the NH group, (ii) dehydrogenation of
the C;C bond to a CdC bond, and (iii) dehalogenation,
herein we report a highly selective and environmentally
benign reaction of starting material 1 to 2 using a compre-
hensive strategy. Thisisalsothe first aqueous Cu-catalyzed
one-pot reaction for the synthesis of pyridazinone deriva-
tives with three chemical bonds transformed.
Initially, we chose 20,30-dichloro-6-phenyl-4,5-dihydro-
pyridazin-3(2H)-one and bromobenzene as the substrates,
and the results of the screening of the reaction conditions
are summarized in Table 1. First, Na2CO3 was used as the
base, and a series of copper salts were used to study the
efficiency of the catalyst (Table 1, entries 1ꢀ4). Although
the use of Cu(OAc)2 gave a detectable yield (21%, Table 1,
entry 1), other copper salts barely gavethe desiredproduct.
We attribute the poor reactivity to the reaction of the
copper ion with the inorganic base in water. To solve this
problem, we synthesized several water-soluble copperꢀsalen
complexes and introduced them to this reaction. To our
delight, the results improved dramatically (for detailed
information of the copper salen complexes, see Support-
ing Information (SI) Table S1). After catalyst screening,
inorganic and organic bases including Cs2CO3, K2CO3,
K3PO4, NaOH, KOH, and triethylamine were investi-
gated and Na2CO3 was found to be the best choice
(Table 1, entries 6ꢀ11). Moreover, the catalytic system
showed low reactivity in organic solvents such as DMF
(26%, Table 1, entry 12). A low temperature decelerated
the reaction rate and resulted in a lower yield with a
prolonged reaction time (48 h, 62%, Table 1, entry 13). A
decreased yield was also observed when 1% catalyst was
loaded, while 10% loading of the catalyst gave a negli-
gible increase in yield (Table 1, entries 14 and 15). In
addition, a series of experiments were carried out to
identify the relationship of this reaction. In an oxygen
atmosphere, dechlorinated pyridazinone was obtained
without N-arylation occurring (Table 1, entry 16). How-
ever, the desired product was not observed in a nitrogen
atmosphere (Table 1, entry 17). Therefore, we hypothe-
size that N-arylation is independent of the dehydrogena-
tion/dechlorination sequence; the detailed mechanism of
(9) (a) Magano, J.; Dunetz, J. R. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, 2177. (b)
Evano, G.; Blanchard, N.; Toumi, M. Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 3054.
(10) (a) Imai, H.; Nishiguchi, T.; Tanaka, M.; Fukuzumi, K. Chem.
Lett. 1976, 855. (b) Imai, H.; Nishiguchi, T.; Tanaka, M.; Fukuzumi, K.
J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 2309. (c) Navarro, O.; Kaur, H.; Mahjoor, P.;
Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2004, 69, 3173. (d) Navarro, O.; Marion, N.;
Oonishi, Y.; Kelly, R. A.; Nolan, S. P. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 685. (e)
Figure 1. (a) Bioactive compounds containing a pyridazinone
scaffold. (b) Improved procedure of 6-phenyl-4,5-dihydropyrida-
zin-3(2H)-one reaction to N(2) substituted 6-phenyl-pyridazin-
3(2H)-one.
ꢀ
Ferrughelli, D. T.; Horvath, I. T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992,
806. (f) Grushin, V. V.; Alper, H. Organometallics 1991, 10, 1620. (g)
Grushin, V. V.; Alper, H. Chem. Rev. 1994, 94, 1047. (h) Qian, C.; Zhu,
D.; Gu, Y. J. Mol. Catal. 1990, 63, L1. (i) Carfagna, C.; Musco, A.;
Pontellini, R. J. Mol. Catal. 1989, 54, L23. (j) Desmarets, C.; Kuhl, S.;
Schneider, R.; Forts, Y. Organometallics 2002, 21, 1554. (k) Ferrughelli,
(7) (a) Curran, W.; Ross, A. J. Med. Chem. 1974, 17, 273. (b) Estevez,
~
ꢀ
I.; Ravina, E.; Sotelo, E. J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1998, 35, 1421. (c) Sotelo,
D. T.; Horvath, I. T. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1992, 806. (l)
~
E.; Ravina, E. Synth. Commun. 2000, 30, 1. (d) Sircar, I.; Duell, B.;
Czaplik, W. M.; Grupe, S.; Mayer, M.; Wangelin, A. J. Chem. Commun.
2010, 46, 6350. (m) Love, C. J.; McQuillin, F. J. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin
Trans. 1973, 2509. (n) Ram, R. N.; Manoj, T. P. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
2243.
(11) (a) Zhang, C.; Tang, C.; Jiao, N. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3464.
(b) Alonso, F.; Beletskaya, I. P.; Yus, M. Chem. Rev. 2002, 102, 4009. (c)
Liang, L.; Yang, G.; Wang, W.; Xu, F.; Niu, Y.; Sun, Q.; Xu, P. Adv.
Synth. Catal. 201310.1002/adsc.201300026.
Bristol, J.; Evans, D. J. Med. Chem. 1985, 28, 1405. (e) Xu, P.; Wang, S.;
Liu, W. J. Chin. Pharm. Sci. 1992, 1, 27.
(8) (a) Stahl, S. S. Science 2005, 309, 1824. (b) Izawa, Y.; Pun, D.;
Stahl, S. S. Science 2011, 333, 209. (c) Diao, T.; Stahl, S. S. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2011, 133, 14566. (d) Diao, T.; Wadzinski, T. J.; Stahl, S. S. Chem.
Sci. 2012, 3, 887. (e) Gao, W.; He, Z.; Qian, Y.; Zhao, J.; Huang, Y.
Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 883.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX