.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Asymmetric hydrogenation of (E)-N-[1-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-
strates, (E)-b-aryl enamides. Zhou and co-workers reported
high ee values with (Z)- or (E)-b-aryl enamides when using
a chiral monophosphane or phosphite ligand, albeit with
limited turnover numbers (substrate/catalyst (s/c) ratio ꢀ
100).[9] For hydrogenation of cyclic[10] or heterocyclic[11] b-
aryl enamides, few efficient chiral rhodium catalysts are
available. We herein report an efficient method for the
synthesis of acyclic, cyclic, or heterocyclic chiral b-arylamines
by hydrogenation of readily accessible (E)-b-aryl enamides.
Excellent reactivity (turnover number (TON) up to 10000)
and enantioselectivities (up to > 99% ee) have been achieved
by employing the Rh–L5 catalyst.
Although both (Z)- and (E)-b-aryl enamides have been
studied for asymmetric hydrogenation, efficient asymmetric
hydrogenation of (E)-b-aryl enamides is more desirable from
a practical point of view, because they are more thermody-
namically stable and can be selectively synthesized. Among
various synthetic methods of b-aryl enamides,[12] we chose to
employ reductive acylation of nitroalkenes[13] to prepare (E)-
b-aryl enamides for synthetic easiness and cost effectiveness.
Thus, Henry reaction between aryl aldehydes and nitro-
alkanes provided (E)-nitroalkenes in high yields. Reductive
acylation of nitroalkenes according to a reported procedure
led to the formation of 3 as E/Z isomeric mixture.[15] By
optimizing the reaction conditions, (E)-b-aryl enamides were
formed preferentially and could be isolated in moderate to
good yields without column chromatography (Scheme 2).
This rapid and economical method holds promise for practical
synthesis of (E)-b-aryl enamides.
prop-1-en-2-yl]acetamide.[a]
Entry
Ligand
s/c
200
200
200
200
200
200
200
10000
ee [%][b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
(R)-BINAP
(R,S)-Josiphos
3
13
27
11
35
74
97
97
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L5
7
8[c]
[a] The hydrogenations were carried out in dichloromethane (2 mL) for
12 h with 3a (0.1 mmol), [Rh(nbd)2]BF4 (0.5 mmol; nbd=3,5-norborna-
diene), and ligand (0.6 mmmol) unless otherwise specified; all reactions
proceeded completely; the absolute configuration was determined as R
by comparing the optical rotation with reported data. [b] Determined by
HPLC on a Chiralcel AD-H column. [c] 3a (1 mmol), [Rh(nbd)(L5)]BF4
(0.1 mmol), dichloromethane (2 mL), 808C, H2 (750 psi), 20 h.
substrate/catalyst ratio (s/c = 10000) was employed (Table 1,
entry 8), thus demonstrating the high reactivity and efficiency
of ligand L5 for this transformation.
With Rh–L5 as the catalytic system, different substituted
(E)-b-aryl-N-acetyl enamides were hydrogenated to provide
an array of chiral b-arylamines in good to excellent enantio-
selectivities. High ee values were achieved regardless of the
electronic property or the substitution pattern on the benzene
ring (Table 2). An excellent ee value (> 99% ee) was also
achieved with a substrate containing a 4-methoxy substituent
Table 2: Asymmetric hydrogenation of (E)-b-aryl-N-acetyl enamides.[a]
Entry
R’
R’’ (3)
ee [%][b] (4)
Scheme 2. Syntheses of (E)-b-aryl-N-acetyl enamides from aldehydes
and nitroalkanes. R’=substituents on the aromatic ring; R”=Me or
Et.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ph
Me (3b)
Me (3c)
Me (3d)
Me (3e)
Me (3 f)
Me (3g)
Me (3h)
Me (3i)
Me (3j)
Me (3k)
Me (3l)
Me (3m)
Me (3n)
Et (3o)
97 (4b)
99 (4c)
98 (4d)
>99 (4e)
96 (4 f)
99 (4g)
98 (4h)
98 (4i)
98 (4j)
99 (4k)
97 (4l)
96 (4m)
93 (4n)
98 (4o)
98 (4p)
2-MeOC6H4
3-MeOC6H4
4-MeOC6H4
2-MeC6H4
3,5-(BnO)2C6H3
2-ClC6H4
3-BrC6H4
4-BrC6H4
4-FC6H4
1-naphthyl
2-naphthyl
3-thiophenyl
Ph
The asymmetric hydrogenation of (E)-N-[1-(3,5-dimeth-
oxyphenyl)prop-1-en-2-yl]acetamide (3a) was investigated
with various chiral rhodium catalysts. The hydrogenations
were conducted at room temperature at a hydrogen pressure
of 300 psi for 12 h. It was found that well-known chiral ligands
such as BINAP, Josiphos, and Tangphos[8] did not provide
superb enantioselectivities (Table 1, entries 1–2). Ligand
BIBOP (L1), which was highly effective for hydrogenation
of a-aryl-N-acetyl enamides in our previous study,[14] proved
to be inefficient (Table 1, entry 3). A low ee was also observed
when MeO-BIBOP (L2) was applied (Table 1, entry 4).
Gratifyingly, the enantioselectivity increased dramatically
when ligands L3–5 containing various aryl groups as R groups
were employed (Table 1, entries 5–7). When L5 with anthra-
cenyl groups was applied, the enantioselectivity reached
97%. An excellent ee value was also achieved when a high
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
4-MeOC6H4
Et (3p)
[a] The hydrogenations were carried out in dichloromethane (0.5 mL) at
508C, under 750 psi of H2 for 12 h with substrate (0.1 mmol) and
[Rh(nbd)(L5)]BF4 (0.5 mmmol); the absolute configuration was assigned
as R by comparing the optical rotation with reported data[8,9] or by
analogy; the yields were >99%. [b] Determined by chiral HPLC, see
Supporting Information for details.
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!