.
Angewandte
Communications
elimination from [Ti(NMe2)4] and 2 equivalents of 2-MeAP-
H.[9] In agreement with Kempeꢀs result, we were able to detect
by H NMR spectroscopy that stirring of a 1:2 mixture of
is almost identical to the result of a control experiment
performed with 10 mol% [(2-MeAP)2Ti(NMe2)2][9] which was
synthesized according to Kempeꢀs procedure (Table 1,
entry 9).[11]
1
[Ti(NMe2)4] und 2-MeAP-H in toluene or n-hexane at room
temperature results in the selective formation of the complex
[(2-MeAP)2Ti(NMe2)2] (Scheme 2).[10] In contrast, an analo-
gous experiment performed with a 1:1 mixture of [Ti(NMe2)4]
und 2-MeAP-H did not give the expected complex [(2-
MeAP)Ti(NMe2)3] selectively. In this case, a statistical mix-
ture of [(2-MeAP)Ti(NMe2)3], [(2-MeAP)2Ti(NMe2)2], and
the precursor [Ti(NMe2)4] in a ratio of approximately 1:1:1
was formed.
Because 2-aminopyridinato Ti-complexes have never
been used as catalysts for hydroaminoalkylation reactions of
alkenes, we investigated whether the in situ generated com-
plexes are able to catalyze the hydroaminoalkylation of
styrene (4) with N-methylaniline (1). For that purpose,
mixtures of [Ti(NMe2)4] (10 mol%) and 2-MeAP-H (10 or
20 mol%) in toluene were stirred at 258C for 15 h and after
addition of N-methylaniline and styrene, the mixtures were
heated to 1058C for 96 h (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). Fortu-
nately and in contrast to a corresponding reaction performed
in the absence of 2-MeAP-H (Table 1, entry 1), it was possible
to isolate the desired products 5a and 5b in combined yields
of 55 and 10%. Particularly important is that these two
experiments represent the first examples of a hydroaminoal-
kylation performed with N-methylaniline in which the linear
product 5b is formed in larger quantities than the branched
product 5a. A brief optimization study then revealed that
a simple elevation of the reaction temperature to 1408C and
a change of the solvent to n-hexane significantly improve the
combined yields to 79 and 76% (Table 1, entries 8 and 9). In
this context, it is of note that the result obtained with
a mixture of 10 mol% [Ti(NMe2)4] and 20 mol% 2-MeAP-H
A comparison of the results obtained with 10 and
20 mol% 2-MeAP-H in Table 1 leads to the conclusion that
the use of 20 mol% 2-MeAP-H mostly results in a better
regioselectivity in favor of the linear product 5b but a reduced
overall yield of the reaction. In addition, it becomes clear that
with increasing temperature, the regioselectivity of the
reaction decreases while the yield increases. Under optimized
conditions (Table 1, entry 8), it was finally possible to obtain
the products 5a and 5b in 79% combined yield with
a regioselectivity of 32:68 in favor of the linear product 5b.
The control experiments performed in the absence of 2-
MeAP-H which are also presented in Table 1 (entries 1,4,7)
impressively show that in comparison with [Ti(NMe2)4], the
in situ generated 2-aminopyridinato titanium catalysts have
a significantly improved catalytic activity.
We next turned our attention towards hydroaminoalkyla-
tion reactions of styrene (4) with various other amines
(Table 2). All corresponding reactions were performed in
sealed Schlenk tubes at 1408C for 96 h with n-hexane as the
solvent and the catalysts were generated in situ from
10 mol% [Ti(NMe2)4] and 10 or 20 mol% 2-MeAP-H.
During these studies, it was recognized that the hydro-
aminoalkylation of styrene (4) can not only be achieved with
N-methylanilines (Table 2, entries 1–8) but also with N-ethyl-,
N-propyl-, and N-benzylaniline (Table 2, entries 9–14) as well
as with dialkylamines (Table 2, entries 15–24). A comparison
of the regioselectivities observed with the N-alkylanilines 1, 9,
10, and 11 reveals that the regioselectivity in favor of the
linear product increases with increasing size of the N-alkyl
substituent. Correspondingly, the best selectivities of ꢀ 91:9 in
favor of the linear product were observed with N-propyl- (10)
and N-benzylaniline (11). In these cases, moderate to good
yields of 48% and 85% could be achieved (Table 2, entries 11
and 13). In contrast to the strong influence of the N-alkyl
substituent on the regioselectivity of the reaction, ortho-
substitution or donor- and acceptor substituents on the
benzene ring of the N-methylanilines are less important for
the regioselectivity but on the other hand, strongly influence
the reactivity of the amine (Table 2, entries 1–8). Particularly
interesting is the fact that for the first time, hydroaminoalky-
lation reactions of styrene (4) could also be achieved with
dialkylamines (Table 2, entries 15–24). As observed before
with the N-alkylanilines, preferred formation of the linear
product (up to 93:7) took place in all cases and at least some
reactions gave good yields (up to 71%). However, it must be
mentioned that prior to isolation, the products obtained from
dialkylamines were converted into para-toluenesulfonamides.
Interestingly, reactions of the unsymmetrically substituted
amines N-methylcyclohexylamine (12) and N-methylhexyl-
amine (13) took place at the methyl group of the amine
selectively while the alkylation of N-methylbenzylamine (14)
only occurred in the benzyl position. These findings are in
good agreement with results described by Schafer et al.[4e]
Finally, analogous hydroaminoalkylation reactions using
N-methylaniline (1) were performed with various other
Table 1: Hydroaminoalkylation of styrene (4) with N-methylaniline (1).[10]
Entry
2-MeAP-H
[mol%]
Solvent
T [8C]
Yield
Selectivity
5a+5b [%][a]
5a/5b[b]
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
–
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
toluene
n-hexane
n-hexane
n-hexane
105
105
105
140
140
140
140
140
140
–
55
10
11
78
41
6
–
10
20
–
10
20
–
39:61
23:77
39:61
46:54
34:66
42:58
32:68
34:66
10
20
79
76[c]
[a] Reaction conditions: N-methylaniline (1, 2.0 mmol), styrene (4,
3.0 mmol), [Ti(NMe2)4] (0.2 mmol, 10 mol%), 2-MeAP-H (0.2 mmol,
10 mol% or 0.4 mmol, 20 mol%), solvent (1.0 mL), T, 96 h. Yields refer
to the total yield of isolated product (5a+5b). [b] GC analysis prior to
chromatography. [c] A control experiment performed with 10 mol% [(2-
MeAP)2Ti(NMe2)2] gave a comparable result (76%, 5a/5b=33:67).
2
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 1 – 5
These are not the final page numbers!