intermediate A in tandem schemes,9 it was observed that
the C-/N-chemoselectivity of intermediate A was largely
determined by the R-substituent; i.e., R-unsubstituted
A (R2 = H) generally showed a propensity to be a
C-nucleophile, whereas R-substituted A (R2 ¼ H) acts as
a N-nucelophile.9i,j On the basis of these observations, we
envisioned that a chemoselective tandem coupling reaction
of A with isocyanates could provide a novel one-pot
method for the synthesis of pyrimidin-2,4-diones that does
not require the isolation of β-enaminoesters. When the
addition of R-substituted A (R2 ¼ H) to isocyanates
proceeds chemoselectively at the nitrogen atom, 3,5,6-
trisubstituted pyrimidin-2,4-diones are obtained in a one-
pot manner (path a in Scheme 1). In addition, the C-nu-
cleophilic character of R-unsubstituted A allows us to
design the sequential tandem reaction with an isocyanate
and a carbonylating agent such as triphosgene (path b in
Scheme 1), or with an appropriate electrophile and an
isocyanate (path c in Scheme 1), enhancing the divergency
of accessible pyrimidin-2,4-diones.
We first investigated the effects of R-substituents on the
reactivity and C-/N-chemoselectivity of A toward isocya-
nate electrophiles. The tandem reaction of R-unsubstituted
Aaa (R1 = Ph, R2 = H, R = Et), formedbythe reactionof
benzonitrile (1a) and a Reformatsky reagent generated
in situ from ethyl R-bromoacetate (2a), with 1.1 equiv of
phenyl isocyanate 3a at 40 °C afforded the R-carboamoy-
lated β-enaminoester 5 in 92% yield. This result clearly
indicates that the R-unsubstituted intermediate Aaa has a
propensity to act as a C-nucleophile toward isocyanate
electrophiles. In contrast, the R-methyl substituted inter-
mediate Aab (R1 = Ph, R2 = Me, R = Me), formed with
2b, showed its N-nucleophilic nature, and thus reacted
with 3a to afford the pyrimidin-2,4-dione 4a. However, its
reactivity is not sufficiently high yielding only 58% of 4a
(Scheme 2b). The reaction efficiency was not significantly
improved by either increasing the reaction temperature or
the addition of an equivalent of base such as NaH or
NaHMDS. Under these reaction conditions, the phenyl
methyl carbamate was formed as a major side product,
which implied that methoxyzinc bromide, generated dur-
ing pyrimidindione ring formation, could also react with
phenyl isocyanate, decreasing the yield of product. To
address this problem, we attempted to increase the electro-
philicity of the isocyanate using a Lewis acid. To our
delight, we found that, in the presence of 10 mol %
Cu(OAc)2, the first coupling reaction of Aab with 1.5 equiv
of 3a proceeded very cleanly at room temperature
Scheme 1. Strategy for the Divergent Tandem Synthesis of
Pyrimidin-2,4-diones Using the Blaise Reaction Intermediate
methods are based on a pre-existing pyrimidindione moi-
ety. Hence, the de novo construction of the pyrimidin-2,4-
dione scaffold from a readily available starting material
has continued to draw much interest. Prominent methods
for the synthesis of pyrimidin-2,4-diones include the annu-
lative condensation of β-keto esters with urea derivatives6
or the coupling of R-seleno β-aminoester with isocyanates,
followed by oxidative olefination.7 However, these reac-
tions generally required prolonged reaction times at ele-
vated temperatures. Recently, Fustero and co-workers
reported on the use of β-enaminoesters, which reacted
with isocyanates to synthesize pyrimidin-2,4-diones
through a chemoselective couplingꢀcyclization cascade
reaction.8 Nevertheless, the reported protocols relied on
the prerequisite synthesis of β-enaminoesters by the reac-
tion of a nitrile with lithium ester enolate, formed from
LDA and alkanoates at ꢀ78 °C, and necessitated an excess
of a strong base, NaH, for the coupling of the isolated
β-enaminoesters with isocyanates.
The addition of a Reformatsky reagent to nitriles (Blaise
reaction) is known to proceed via the zinc bromide com-
plex of β-enaminoester intermediate A that combines the
C-/N- ambident nucleophilicity of enamines with electro-
philic β-unsaturated ester moieties (Scheme 1). During
the course of our recent research program on the use of
ꢀ
(5) (a) Cerna, I.; Pohl, R.; Klepetarova, B.; Hocek, M. Org. Lett.
ꢀ
ꢁꢀ
ꢁ
ꢁꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁ
2006, 8, 5389. (b) Cerna, I.; Pohl, R.; Klepetarova, B.; Hocek, M. J. Org.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁꢀ ꢁ
Chem. 2008, 73, 9048. (c) Cerna, I.; Pohl, R.; Klepetarova, B.; Hocek, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 2302. (d) Majumdar, K. C.; Sinha, B.; Maji,
P. K.; Chattopadhyay, S. K. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2751. (e) Do, H.-Q.;
Khan, R. M.; Daugulis, O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 15185. (f)
Campeau, L. ꢀC.; Stuart, D. R.; Leclerc, J.-P.; Bertrand-Laperle, M.;
Villemure, E.; Sun, H.-Y.; Lasserre, S.; Guimond, N.; Lecavallier, M.;
Fagnou J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 3291. (g) Huests, M. P.; Fagnou,
K. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 1357. (h) Cernova, M.; Pohl, R.; Hocek, M. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2009, 3698. (i) Cernova, M.; Cerna, I.; Pohl, R.; Hocek, M.
J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 5309.
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢁ
ꢁ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
(9) (a) Chun, Y. S.; Lee, K. K.; Ko, Y. O.; Shin, H.; Lee, S.-g. Chem.
Commun. 2008, 5098. (b) Ko, Y. O.; Chun, Y. S.; Park, C.-L.; Lee, Y.;
Shin, H.; Ahn, S.; Hong, J.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2009, 7, 1132.
(c) Chun, Y. S.; Ko, Y. O.; Shin, H.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 3414.
(d) Chun, Y. S.; Ryu, K. Y.; Ko, Y. O.; Hong, J. Y.; Hong, J.; Shin, H.;
Lee, S.-g. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 7556. (e) Ko, Y. O.; Chun, Y. S.; Kim,
Y.; Kim, S. J.; Shin, H.; Lee, S.-g. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010, 51, 6893. (f)
Chun, Y. S.; Ryu, K. Y.; Kim, J. H.; Shin, H.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Biomol.
Chem. 2011, 9, 1317. (g) Kim, J. H.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1350.
(h) Chun, Y. S.; Lee, J. H.; Kim, J. H.; Ko, Y. O.; Lee, S.-g. Org. Lett.
2011, 13, 6390. (i) Kim, J. H.; Shin, H.; Lee, S.-g. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77,
1560. (j) Chun, Y. S.; Kim, J. H.; Choi, S. Y.; Ko, Y. O.; Lee, S.-g. Org.
Lett. 2012, 14, 6358.
(6) (a) Sweet, F.; Fissekis, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 8741. (b)
Kappe, C. O. J. Org. Chem. 1997, 62, 7201. (c) Burgula, L. N.;
Radhakrishnan, K.; Kundu, L. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2012, 53, 2639.
(d) Morshed, M. M.; Wang, Q.; Islam, S.; Hossain, M. M. Synth.
Commun. 2007, 37, 173. (e) Nieto, R. M.; Coelho, A.; Martinez, A.;
~
Stefanachi, A.; Sotelo, E.; Ravian, E. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 1025.
(f) Sala, G. D.; Artillo, A.; Richart, S.; Spinella, A. J. Organomet. Chem.
2007, 692, 1623.
(7) (a) Keen, S. P.; Weinerb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 4307.
(b) Cao, J.; Huang, X. Synth. Commun. 2009, 39, 205.
ꢁ
(8) Fustero, S.; Piera, J.; Sanz-Cervera, J. F.; Catalan, S.; de Arella-
no, C. R. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1417.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX