.
Angewandte
Communications
palladium-catalyzed synthesis of sulfone 2d from 4-tolylbor-
onic acid and phenethyl bromide (2 equiv) in the presence of
10 mol% Pd(OAc)2, 10 mol% ligand, tetrabutylammonium
bromide (1.1 equiv), and K2S2O5 (2.2 equiv) in DME at 858C
for 22 h (Table 1, entries 2–10).[13] A constant observation
over the course of these studies was that electron-rich,
sterically encumbered ligands featuring P(tBu)2 substitution
consistently supported efficient catalysis for this transforma-
tion (Table 1, entries 7,8). Having identified tBuXPhos (L6)
as the optimal ligand, we screened the other reaction
parameters (palladium source, solvent, additives) in search
of improved reaction yields. Notably, the source of palladium
and solvent had a dramatic impact on the reaction outcome,
whereby the use of [Pd(MeCN)2Cl2] and DMF was shown to
provide superior yields of 2d (Table 1, entry 13). Whereas
most other PdII sources provided modest yields of 2d, the use
of Pd0 sources, such as [Pd2dba3], resulted in no observable
sulfone product. The effect of TBAB on the reaction was
tested by preparing sulfone 2d in the absence of this additive
(Table 1, entry 14). The observed decrease in yield from 74%
to 52% prompted us to further use TBAB in reaction scope
exploration. The heterogeneous nature of the reaction
mixture has thus far precluded further investigation into the
beneficial effect of TBAB; however, it is reasonable to
postulate that its presence contributes to increasing the
solubility of the inorganic salt employed. Whereas partial
catalytic activity was also observed in the absence of L6
(Table 1, entry 15), the notable increase in yield of 2d with the
ligand present warranted its use in further defining the
substrate scope of this reaction. Interestingly, replacement of
K2S2O5 with DABSO[5l,14] (an alternative surrogate of SO2)
produced sulfone 2d in only 16% yield (Table 1, entry 16).
Sulfur dioxide and K2SO3 also proved to be ineffective.
Having defined an effective catalyst system and reaction
conditions for the synthesis of aryl alkyl sulfone 2d from
readily available precursors, we sought to explore the scope of
suitable (hetero)aromatic boronic acid substrates (Scheme 3).
When reacted with n-propyl bromide, both electron-rich and
-neutral aromatic boronic acids gave the corresponding n-
propylsulfones in good yields (2c, 2e,f; 45–86%). Halo-
substituted substrates were equally competent under standard
conditions (2g–2i), which may provide further opportunities
for subsequent derivatization by metal-mediated couplings.
Hydroxy and acetamide functional groups were well tolerated
under the reaction conditions and no side-products arising
from alkylation of these groups were isolated (2j, 2k). Ortho-
substituted boronic acids were also compatible substrates for
this reaction, providing the products 2l and 2m in 62% and
54% yields, respectively. The compatibility of this reaction
with boronic acids featuring protic functional groups and
ortho-substitution, in addition to capitalizing on another set of
widely available monomers, makes it complementary to our
previously reported method using heteroaryl halides.[8a,15]
Given the value of substituted heterocycles in the pharma-
ceutical industry, where control of the lipophilicity of drug
candidates is of prime importance, we were pleased to
observe that the method was compatible with substituted
pyridines (2n, 2o), quinolines (2p, 2q), indazole (2r), and
thiophene (2s). Of note, alternative boron coupling partners
Scheme 2. Initial results of aryl akyl sulfone synthesis from boronic
acids.
Table 1: Reaction optimization with unactivated electrophiles.[a]
entry
[Pd]
Ligand
Yield[b]
1
Pd(OAc)2
–
0
8
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
Pd(OAc)2
[Pd2dba3]
[Pd(MeCN)2Cl2]
[Pd(MeCN)2Cl2]
[Pd(MeCN)2Cl2]
[Pd(MeCN)2Cl2]
L1
L2
L3
L4
L5
L6
L7
L8
L9
L6
L6
L6
L6
–
22
25
22
0
37
6
15
22
56
0
74
52
61
16
10
11[c]
12[c]
13[c]
14[c,d]
15[c]
16[c,e]
L6
[a] Reaction conditions: 4-TolB(OH)2 (0.52 mmol), Ph(CH2)2Br
(2 equiv), K2S2O5 (2.2 equiv), TBAB (1.1 equiv), [Pd] (10 mol%), ligand
(10 mol%), DME (0.3m), 858C, 22 h. [b] Yield of isolated sulfone 2d
product (%). [c] DMF used in place of DME. [d] TBAB omitted from
reaction. [e] DABSO used in place of K2S2O5.
substrates resulted in significantly diminished yields of
isolated sulfone. More importantly, employing these condi-
tions for unactivated n-propyl halides resulted in no con-
version to the desired aryl alkyl sulfone 2c and led to
unproductive protodeboronation. To develop a more effec-
tive and general method, we focused our efforts on the
identification of conditions amenable to the use of unacti-
vated alkyl electrophiles (Table 1).
We initiated our optimization studies by evaluating
a series of structurally diverse ligands to support the
ꢀ 2015 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 13571 –13575