ChemComm
Communication
Some of the compounds synthesized were tested against
PDE4B in vitro12 when 4b, 4e, 4g, 4i, 4j, 4k, 4h, 4n and 4q
showed 43, 41, 40, 74, 49, 40, 42, 45 and 58% inhibition,
respectively, at 30 mM and 4i (IC50 > 5 mM vs. rolipram’s
IC50 B 1 mM) being the best among them.
In conclusion, novel cyclopenta[b]indoles have been synthesized
as potential inhibitors of PDE4 via a Pd-mediated new cascade
reaction involving an intramolecular Heck coupling followed by the
construction of a fused cyclopentane ring in a single pot.
BP thanks CSIR for a research fellowship. The authors thank
Prof. J. Iqbal and CSIR for support, Dr K. Parsa and Swetha
Chintala for in vitro assay and Dr C. Malla Reddy, IISER,
Kolkata, for X-ray studies.
Scheme 3 The proposed reaction mechanism.
Notes and references
1 (a) K. C. Nicolaou, T. Montagnon and S. A. Snyder, Chem. Commun.,
2003, 551; (b) R. A. Bunce, Tetrahedron, 1995, 48, 13103; (c) L. F.
Tietze and U. Belifuss, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1993, 32, 131; (d) M. Ihara
and K. Fukumoto, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1993, 32, 1010; (e) C. P.
Jasperse, D. P. Curran and T. L. Fevig, Chem. Rev., 1991, 91, 1237.
2 For in-depth reviews, see: (a) J. Barluenga, F. Rodriguez and
F. J. Fananas, Chem.–Asian J., 2009, 4, 1036; (b) K. Kruger (nee Alex),
A. Tillack and M. Beller, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2008, 350, 2153;
(c) S. Cacchi and G. Fabrizi, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2873.
3 (a) Y. Ouyang, K. Koike and T. Ohmoto, Phytochemistry, 1994,
37, 575; (b) E. Lai, I. De Lepeleire, T. M. Crumley, F. Liu,
L. A. Wenning, N. Michiels, E. Vets, G. O’Neill, J. A. Wagner and
K. Gottesdiener, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 2007, 81, 849.
Fig. 3 The Heck product 6 isolated from the reaction of 3b and the side product
7 isolated from 3a.
Mechanistically, the reaction seemed to proceed via genera-
tion of E-1 in situ as a result of an intramolecular Heck reaction
which then undergoes a C–N bond cleavage near the indole
nitrogen to give E-2 (Scheme 3). A subsequent intramolecular
attack of the indole ring via its C-3 position on –CQC– provides
E-3. Activation of –CQN– of E-3 in the presence of Pd(0) aided
by the proximate sulfonamide moiety facilitated a further
intramolecular attack on the olefinic bond leading to E-4. The
six-membered Pd-containing ring of E-4 then undergoes C–N
bond cleavage to give E-5 which after following a few more steps
including the reductive elimination of Pd(0) to complete the
catalytic cycle afforded product 4. It is evident that the sulfon-
amide moiety played a key role in the present cascade reaction,
the electron releasing property of which towards Pd was greatly
facilitated by the electron rich thienyl moiety. This perhaps
provides some explanations to the observation that replacing
the thienyl moiety of 3 by a p-tolyl ring did not provide 4 as a
major product.8a Nevertheless, it is evident from Table 1 that
the formation of 4 was also dependent on the nature of catalyst/
solvent used.
4 A. Kodimuthali, S. L. Jabaris and M. Pal, J. Med. Chem., 2008,
51, 5471.
5 (a) C. Hulme, K. Moriarty, B. Miller, R. Mathew, M. Ramanjulu,
P. Cox, J. Souness, K. M. Page, J. Uhl, J. Travis, F. C. Huang,
R. Labaudiniere and S. W. Djuric, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998,
8, 1867; (b) J. G. Montana, G. M. Buckley, N. Cooper, H. J. Dyke,
L. Gowers, J. P. Gregory, P. G. Hellewell, H. J. Kendall, C. Lowe,
R. Maxey, J. Miotla, R. J. Naylor, K. A. Runcie, B. Tuladhar and J. B. H.
Warneck, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 1998, 8, 2635; (c) The study showed
binding of E deep into the active site (docking score À18.22)
along with an H-bond interaction of the NH of the cyclopenta-
[b]indole moiety of E with the Gln 443 residue.
6 (a) C. A. Harrison, R. Leineweber, C. J. Moody and J. M. J. Williams,
Tetrahedron Lett., 1993, 34, 8527; (b) A. R. Katritzky, G. Zhangh,
L. Xie and I. Ghiviriga, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 7558; (c) E. M. Ferreira
and B. M. Stoltz, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 9578; (d) L. Ackermann
and A. Althammer, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 1627;
(e) M. Yagoubi, A. C. F. Cruz, P. L. Nichols, R. L. Elliott and
M. C. Willis, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 7958.
7 (a) P. M. Kumar, K. S. Kumar, P. K. Mohakhud, K. Mukkanti,
R. Kapavarapu, K. V. L. Parsa and M. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 431; (b) R. Adepu, R. Sunke, C. L. T. Meda, D. Rambabu,
G. R. Krishna, C. M. Reddy, G. S. Deora, K. V. L. Parsa and M. Pal,
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 190.
8 For our earlier study on the synthesis of functionalized indoles, see:
(a) B. Prasad, B. Y. Sreenivas, D. Rambabu, G. R. Krishna,
C. M. Reddy, K. L. Kumar and M. Pal, Chem. Commun., 2013,
49, 3970; (b) B. Prasad, R. Adepu, S. Sandra, D. Rambabu,
G. R. Krishna, C. M. Reddy, G. S. Deora, P. Misra and M. Pal, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 10434.
The initial Heck type coupling was supported by the fact that
the corresponding Heck product 6 (cf. E-1, Fig. 3) was isolated
from the reaction of 3b (see ESI† for spectral data).11 While all
our attempts to isolate any other intermediates E-2-5 were not
successful we, however, were able to isolate a side product 7
9 Y. X. Li, H. X. Wang, S. Ali, X. F. Xia and Y. M. Liang, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 2343.
10 CCDC 918746†.
(analogous to E-4) (Fig. 3) along with 4a from the conversion of 11 (a) Further, the reaction of a deiodinated analogue of 3ai.e.N-(1-allyl-
5-chloro-1H-indol-2-yl)-N-phenylthiophene-2-sulfonamide did not
proceed under the condition of entry 4 of Table 1; (b) While the
possibility of an initial Pd-mediated Claisen-type rearrangement
3a under the condition of entry 4 of Table 1 in the presence of
catalytic acetic acid. Compound 7 seemed to have formed via a
nucleophilic attack on the iminium nitrogen of the intermedi-
ate obtained from E-3 by the acetate ion (instead of Pd,
cf. Scheme 3). This suggests that the present cascade reaction
arguably proceeds via E-4.
followed by Heck reaction leading to E-3 (we thank one of the
reviewers for pointing out this) cannot be ruled out the isolation of 6
perhaps points towards the path shown in Scheme 3.
12 P. Wang, J. G. Myers, P. Wu, B. Cheewatrakoolpong, R. W. Egan and
M. M. Billah, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 1997, 234, 320.
c
6718 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6716--6718
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013