1092
M. R. Dintzner
LETTER
developed into an undergraduate organic chemistry labo-
ratory discovery/research project, the details of which
have been reported.13
References and Notes
(1) Khan, A. T.; Choudhury, L. H.; Parvin, T.; Ali, M. A.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 8137.
(2) Tian, X. T.; Jaber, J. J.; Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 71, 3176.
(3) Reddy, U. C.; Bondalapati, S.; Saikia, A. K. J. Org. Chem.
2009, 74, 2605.
(4) Lasszlo, P. Science 1987, 235, 1473; and references cited
therein.
(5) Nagendrappa, G. Resonance 2002, 64.
O
MeO OMe
MeOH
H
H
Mont-K10
benzene
Δ
O2N
O2N
HO
1a
4
(6) Dintzner, M. R.; Mondjinou, Y.; Pileggi, D. J. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2010, 51, 826.
(7) Dintzner, M. R.; Mondjinou, Y.; Unger, B. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2009, 50, 6639.
(8) Dintzner, M. R.; Little, A. J.; Pacilli, M.; Pileggi, D. J.;
Osner, Z. R.; Lyons, T. W. Tetrahedron Lett. 2007, 48, 1577.
(9) Dintzner, M. R.; Wucka, P.; Lyons, T. W. J. Chem. Educ.
2006, 83, 270.
+
O
O
+
H
(10) Dintzner, M. R.; Lyons, T. W.; Akroush, M. H.; Wucka, P.;
Rzepka, A. T. Synlett 2005, 785.
O2N
O2N
5
(11) Dintzner, M. R.; McClelland, K. M.; Morse, K. M.;
Akroush, M. H. Synlett 2004, 2028.
6
(12) Dintzner, M. R.; Morse, K. M.; McClelland, K. M.;
Coligado, D. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 79.
(13) Dintzner, M. R.; Maresh, J. J.; Kinzie, C. R.; Arena, A. F.;
Speltz, T. J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 265.
(14) Typical Procedure for the Mont-K10-Catalyzed Prins–
Friedel–Crafts Reaction for the Synthesis of 2a: In a 5-mL
round-bottomed flask, equipped with a magnetic stir bar, the
Mont-K10 clay (200 mg) and p-nitrobenzaldehyde (151 mg,
1 mmol) were combined with benzene (2 mL). Methanol
(202 μL, 5 mmol) was added, followed by 3-buten-1-ol (94
μL, 1.1 mmol) and the reaction mixture was refluxed with
vigorous stirring. Reaction progress was monitored by TLC
(in 1:1 hexanes–EtOAc). When the reaction was complete,
the mixture was allowed to cool to r.t. Then, the product
mixture was vacuum filtered, washing with acetone, to
separate the clay. The filtrate was concentrated under
vacuum to give a pale yellow solid (255 mg, 90%). See ref.
15 for the experimental details and characteristic data.
(15) Analytical Data for Compound 2a: 1H NMR and 13C NMR
spectra were recorded at 300 MHz and 100 MHz,
respectively. The proton signal of residual, non-deuterated
solvent (δ = 7.26 ppm for CHCl3) was used as an internal
reference for 1H NMR spectra. 13C NMR chemical shifts are
reported relative to the δ = 77.23 ppm resonance of CDCl3.
Coupling constants are reported in Hz. IR spectra were
recorded as thin films on a Nicolet Avatar 360 instrument.
GC analysis was performed on a Hewlett Packard 5890
Series II gas chromatograph with a 5971 Series mass
selective detector. Tetrahydro-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-4-
phenyl-2H-pyran (2a): IR (CDCl3): 3029, 2942, 1849,
1602, 1517, 1345, 1130, 1106, 1085, 850, 744 cm–1. 1H
NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 8.20 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.57
(d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.23–7.33 (m, 5 H), 4.60 (dd, J = 11.2,
2.0 Hz, 1 H), 4.30–4.36 (m, 1 H), 2.75–3.83 (m, 1 H), 2.95–
3.05 (m, 1 H), 2.10 (dq, J = 13.2, 2.0 Hz, 1 H), 1.85–1.90 (m,
2 H), 1.70 (q, J = 12.4 Hz, 1 H). 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3):
δ = 150.0, 145.5, 142.9, 128.3, 127.4, 126.7, 126.4, 125.7,
79.8, 68.5, 42.0, 41.5, 33.3. GC–MS (70 eV; tR = 13.174
min): m/z (%) = 283 (28) [M+], 205 (88) [M – 78]+, 104 (100)
[M – 179]+, 91 (68) [M – 192]+.
O
O
H
+
– H+
Ph
O2N
O2N
2a
Scheme 3 Proposed mechanism
We next set out to probe the scope of the reaction with a
sample of readily available carbonyl compounds (Table
1). Our results, though far from exhaustive, are consistent
with those reported by Reddy et al. using BF3·OEt2.3 Of
particular note are the observed yields for the reactions
with acetone and cyclohexanone (Table 1, entries 5 and 6,
respectively), which are superior to previously reported
values. Our methodology represents a much more envi-
ronmentally and logistically friendly route to the target
compounds, and further expands the repertoire of reac-
tions successfully catalyzed by Montmorillonite K10
clay.14
Table 1 Reaction Scope
Entry Carbonyl R1
R2
Product
Yield (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
1a
1b
1c
1d
1e
1f
p-O2NC6H4
m-O2NC6H4
o-O2NC6H4
m-BrC6H4
Me
H
2a[3,15]
2b[3]
2c[3]
2d[3]
2e[3]
2f[3]
90
88
99
91
75
90
H
H
H
Me
–(H2C)5–
Synlett 2013, 24, 1091–1092
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York