formation in such transformations occurs via a subsequent
ionic process.9 Herein we report radical azidooxygenation
of various alkenes using azidoiodine(III) reagent 110 as
a N3-radical precursor under mild reductive conditions
(Scheme 1).11,12
Table 1. Azidooxygenation of Styrene under Various Conditions
Scheme 1. Radical Azidooxygenation of Alkenes
1
2
time
(h)
temp
(°C)
yield
(%)a
entry
(equiv)
(equiv)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1.5
2
2
3
3
3
3
3
2
1.5
2
3
2
3
3
3
3
2
4
4
4
4
4
3
5
6
6
6
6
6
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
20
0
50
57
57
56
65
53
75
94
74
90
21
93
9
10
11
12
2.5
3
3
2.5
3
3
40
We have recently shown that the CF3-radical can be
cleanly generated from a CF3-iodine(III) reagent (Togni
reagent)13 by single electron transfer (SET) using TEM-
PONa 214 as an organic reducing reagent.15 Based on that
result we decided to investigate azidyl radical generation
from azidoiodine(III) reagent 1 by reduction with 2. If SET
is conducted in the presence of an alkene, the N3-radical
should add to the alkene and the adduct radical generated
will be trapped by the 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-N-
oxyl radical (TEMPO)16 which is formed as a byproduct
in the initial SET to eventually give the azidooxygenation
product 3 (Scheme 1). Selective cross-coupling of the
a Isolated yields.
adduct radical by TEMPO is steered by the persistent
radical effect.17
The reaction was optimized using styrene as a test
substrate. The concentration, solvent, and stoichiometry
of the reagents were systematically varied, and 3a was
isolated by purification using SiO2-chromatography. Re-
actions were conducted by slowly adding a freshly pre-
pared THF solution of TEMPONa (0.875 M) to a CH2Cl2
solution (0.2 M) of styrene and 1 at rt togive 3a. Pleasingly,
with 1.5 equiv of 1 and 2 each for 4 h the targeted
azidooxygenation product 3a was isolated in a promising
50% yield (Table 1, entry 1). Increasing the amount of
reagents 1 and 2 led to a further improvement of the yield,
and the best result was achieved upon using a 3-fold excess
of 1 and 2 (Table 1, entries 2ꢀ5, 9, 10). It is likely that the
in situ generated azidyl radical is trapped in a side reaction
by TEMPO to give an unstable N3-TEMPO derivative
which however could not be detected by mass spectro-
metric analysis. We found that a 6 h reaction time is ideal
for this transformation (Table 1, entries 6ꢀ8). Other
solvents such as CH3CN, THF, and trifluorotoluene pro-
vided lower yields (not shown), and running the reaction
at a lower temperature afforded a lower yield (Table 1,
entry 11). Increasing the temperature to 40 °C did not
affect the yield to a large extent (Table 1, entry 12); there-
fore all other experiments were conducted at rt.
(10) 1 was prepared according to: Akai, S.; Okuno, T.; Egi, M.;
Takada, T.; Tohma, H.; Kita, Y. Heterocycles 1996, 42, 47–51.
(11) Applications of azido iodine(III) reagents: (a) Magnus, P.;
Lacour, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 767–769. (b) Magnus, P.; Lacour,
J.; Weber, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 9347–9348. (c) Kita, Y.;
Tohma, H.; Hatanaka, K.; Takada, T.; Fujita, S.; Mitoh, S.; Sakurai, H.;
Oka, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3684–3691. (d) Tingoli, M.;
Temperini, A.; Testaferri, L.; Tiecco, M. Synlett 1995, 1129–1130. (e)
Chen, D.-J.; Chen, Z.-C. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 7361–7363. (f)
Chung, R.; Yu, E. S.; Incarvito, C. D.; Austin, D. J. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
ꢀ
3881–3884. (g) Barluenga, J.; Campos-Gomez, E.; Rodrıguez, D.;
´
ꢀ
ꢀ
Gonzalez-Bobes, F.; Gonzalez, J. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44,
5851–5854. (h) Li, X.-Q.; Wang, W.-K.; Zhang, C. Adv. Synth. Catal.
2009, 351, 2342–2350. (i) Zhou, W.; Zhang, L.; Jiao, N. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2009, 48, 7094–7097. (j) Li, X.-Q.; Wang, W.-K.; Han, Y.-X.; Zhang,
C. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 2588–2598. (k) Matcha, K.; Antonchick,
A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 2082–2086. (l) Antonchick, A. P.;
Burgmann, L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 3267–3271.
(12) (a) Reviews on iodine(III) chemistry: (a) Wirth, T. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 3656–3665. (b) Zhdankin, V. V.; Stang, P. J.
Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 5299–5358. (c) Yusubov, M. S.; Zhdankin, V. V.
Curr. Org. Synth. 2012, 9, 247–272.
(13) (a) Eisenberger, P.; Gischig, S.; Togni, A. Chem.;Eur. J. 2006,
12, 2579–2586. (b) Wiehn, M. S.; Vinogradova, E. V.; Togni, A.
J. Fluorine Chem. 2010, 131, 951–957. (c) Matousek, V.; Togni, A.;
Bizet, V.; Cahard, D. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 5762–5765 and references cited
therein.
(14) Inokuchi, T.; Kawafuchi, H. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 11969–
11975.
(15) (a) Li, Y.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8221–
8224. (b) See also: Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 8950–
8958.
Under optimized conditions various terminal alkenes
were tested in the radical azidooxygenation reaction to
give the corresponding products 3bꢀv (Table 2). Styrene
derivatives bearing electron-donating substituents at the
para-position afforded the azides 3c (4-Me), 3e (4-t-Bu),
(17) (a) Fischer, H. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 3581–3610. (b) Studer, A.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2001, 7, 1159–1164. (c) Studer, A. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2004,
33, 267–273. (d) Studer, A.; Schulte, T. Chem. Rec. 2005, 5, 27–35.
(16) Reviews: (a) Vogler, T.; Studer, A. Synthesis 2008, 1979–1993.
(b) Tebben, L.; Studer, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5034–5068.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX