group on C-7 with the correct trans relationship with respect
to the side chain on C-4 (pseudopteroxazole numbering).
The simpler model 13 was readily prepared by the
sequence outlined in Scheme 1. Not surprisingly, catalytic
reduction furnished the unwantedcisderivative 14through
delivery of the hydrogen from the least hindered face of the
molecule.6 Following precedents by Thompson and by
Nichols,7 weattempted the reduction on the freealcohol15
in a noncoordinating solvent under various conditions,
in the hope that the hydroxyl group would chelate the
palladium and direct the approach of the hydrogen from
the same side and therefore lead to the desired trans
product 16. Unfortunately, our efforts were all in vain.
Another, more fruitful approach relied on an elegant
procedure devised by McCombie and co-workers,4l,m
whereby an intramolecular delivery of hydride is accom-
plished from the correct face by using an internal siloxane.
Indeed, exposure of compound 17 to trifluoroacetic acid
followed by treatment with tetrabutylammonium fluoride
afforded the desired epimer 16 as the major product.
Scheme 1
Scheme 2
efficient addition and cyclization of xanthate 5 to citronel-
lene derived epoxide 6 to give tetralone 7 crisply encapsu-
lates our strategy and underscores the mild and tolerant
nature of the radical process.5a The next stage in this study
called for developing a way to install the missing methyl
Having secured one potential solution, we undertook the
exploration of a conceptually different and possibly more
general route, since it does not require the presence of a well-
positioned hydroxyl group on the side chain. Another
practical drawback of the internal hydride transfer we
sought to avoid is the need to work under high dilution
(0.005 M) and to add the trifluoroacetic acid (10 equiv) very
slowly over 10 h. In our alternative approach, control of
the relative stereochemistry would be achieved by using the
presence of the substituent on C-4 to direct the radical
addition of a thiol to the alkene in 19 from the opposite side
to give intermediate carbon radical 20 (Scheme 2).8 Because
of its proximity, the newly introduced sulfide should exert a
greater influence on the course of the hydrogen atom transfer
and favor the formation of the desired diastereoisomer 21.
Removal of the sulfide would then complete the sequence.
In the event, the outcome was not as clear-cut as initially
hoped. After some experimentation, we found that the
(4) (a) Johnson, T. W.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123,
4475. (b) Davidson, J. P.; Corey, E. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125,
13486. (c) Harmata, M.; Hong, X.; Barnes, C. L. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2201.
(d) Harmata, M.; Hong, X. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 3581. (e) Harmata, M.;
Cai, Z.; Chen, Y. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 74, 5559. (f) Smidt, S. P.; Menges,
F.; Pfaltz, A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 2023. (g) Broka, C. A.; Chan, S.;
Peterson, B. J. Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 1584. (h) Corey, E. J.; Lazerwith,
S. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12777. (i) Kocienski, P. J.; Pontiroli,
A.; Qun, L. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 2001, 2356. (j) Buszek, K. R.;
Bixby, D. L. Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 9129. (k) Harrowven, D. C.;
Tyte, M. J. Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 2089. (l) McCombie, S. W.; Cox,
B.; Lin, S.-I.; Ganguly, A. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32, 2083. (m)
McCombie, S. W.; Cox, B.; Ganguly, A. K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1991, 32,
2087. (n) Majdalani, A.; Schmalz, H.-G. Synlett 1997, 1303. (o)
€
€
Lolsberg, W.; Werle, S.; Neudorfl, J. M.; Schmalz, H. G. Org. Lett.
2012, 14, 5996. (p) Cooksey, J. P.; Kocienski, P. J.; Schmidt, A. W.;
Snaddon, T. N.; Kilner, C. A. Synthesis 2012, 44, 2779. (q) Mans, D. J.;
Cox, G. A.; Rajanbabu, T. V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 5776.
(5) (a) Petit, L.; Zard, S. Z. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 5148. For
earlier examples of tetralone formation using xanthate chemistry, see:
(b) Liard, A.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38,
1759. (c) Cordero-Vargas, A.; Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard, S. Z. Org. Lett.
(6) Tippett, L. M.; Massywestropp, R. A. Aust. J. Chem. 1993, 46,
945.
(7) (a) Thompson, H. W. J. Org. Chem. 1971, 36, 2577. (b) Chambers,
J. J.; Parrish, J. C.; Jensen, N. H.; Kurrasch-Orbaugh, D. M.; Marona-
Lewicka, D.; Nichols, D. E. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 3526.
(8) For a recent review on the radical addition of thiols to alkenes,
see: Hoyle, C. E; Bowman, C. N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 1540.
ꢁ
2003, 5, 3717. (d) Cordero-Vargas, A.; Perez-Martin, I.; Quiclet-Sire, B.;
Zard, S. Z. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2004, 2, 3018. For a review on the
degenerative radical addition of xanthates, see: (e) Quiclet-Sire, B.; Zard,
S. Z. Pure Appl. Chem. 2011, 83, 519.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX