ChemComm
Communication
Table 1 Optimization of reaction conditions for PyBodine(Ala or Pro)–Cu(OAc)2
Although we are still attempting to fully elucidate the
detailed mechanism of the PyBodine(Ala)–Cu(OAc)2-catalyzed
[3+2] cyclization, the results of prior work indicate that the
reaction proceeds via a Cu(I)–acetylide following the reduction
of the Cu(II) complex.17 A proposed model reaction which shows
how the use of PyBodine(Ala)–Cu(OAc)2 results in enantioface
selection to give the (R)-product is provided in the ESI.†
In conclusion, we have developed a series of bis(oxazolidine)-
pyridine ligands (the PyBodines) with applications in the [3+2] cyclo-
addition of azomethine imines with propiolates. The most efficient
catalyst, PyBodine(L-Ala)–Cu(OAc)2, was tailor-made for this reaction
using a screening process based on solid-phase catalysis/CD-HTS.
This work was supported by a Grant-in Aid for Scientific
Research from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science
and Technology (Japan), and by the Workshop on Chirality in
Chiba University (WCCU).
catalyzed [3+2] cycloaddition in solution phase
Entry
PyBodine
Temp. (1C)
Time (h)
Yield (%)
ee (%)
1
2
Ala
Pro
Ala
Ala
Pro
Pro
rt
rt
À40
À40
À40
À40
0.5
0.5
50
28
47
99
99
50
99
88
99
82
55b
90
3
4a
5
94
76b
68b
6a
47
a
b
4A MS was added. (S)-3a was obtained.
Table 2 PyBodine(Ala)–Cu(OAc)2 catalyzed [3+2] cycloadditiona
Notes and references
Entry
R1
R2
Time (h)
Yield (%)
ee (%)
1 (a) T. Eicher and S. Hauptmann, The Chemistry of Heterocycles,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2nd edn, 2003; (b) G. Varvounis,
Y. Fiamegos and G. Pilidis, Adv. Heterocycl. Chem., 2001, 80, 73.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Ph
Et
Et
Et
Et
Et
Et
Et
Me
tBu
Et
28
19
43
27
19
26
45
23
25
27
20
99
81
90
72
77
82
82
92
99
99
99
94
90
95
94
89
94
84
98
80
88
85
p-Me-C6H4
o-Me-C6H4
m-Cl-C6H4
p-F-C6H4
p-I-C6H4
p-MeO-C6H4
Ph
Ph
c-C6H11
iPr
¨
2 (a) S. Karlsson and H.-E. Hogberg, Org. Prep. Proced. Int., 2001, 33, 103;
(b) K. V. Gothelf and K. A. Jørgensen, Chem. Rev., 1998, 98, 863.
3 R. Shintani and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10778.
4 A. Suarez, C. W. Downey and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 11244.
5 M. P. Sibi, D. Rane, L. M. Stanley and T. Soeta, Org. Lett., 2008, 10, 2971.
6 T. Hashimoto, Y. Maeda, M. Omote, H. Nakatsu and K. Maruoka,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 4076.
7 H. Suga, A. Funyu and A. Kakehi, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 97.
8 (a) W. Chen, W. Du, Y.-Z. Duan, Y. Wu, S.-Y. Yang and Y.-C. Chen, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 7667; (b) W. Chen, X.-H. Yuan, R. Li, W. Du,
Y. Wu, L.-S. Ding and Y.-C. Chen, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2006, 348, 1818.
9 T. Imaizumi, Y. Yamashita and S. Kobayashi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2012, 134, 20049.
10 Other relating recent works: (a) L. Hong, M. Kai, C. Wu, W. Sun,
G. Zhu, G. Li, X. Yao and R. Wang, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 6713;
(b) K. Tanaka, T. Kato, S. Fujinami, Y. Ukaji and K. Inomata, Chem.
Lett., 2010, 1036; (c) M. Keller, A. S. S. Sido, P. Pale and J. Sommer,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 2810.
8
9b
10
11
Et
a
Absolute configuration of the products is presented by analogy from
the comparison of [a]D.3 b Reaction at À40 1C to room temperature.
The highly stereoselective construction of the PyBodine(Pro)
ligand was also confirmed using 1NMR spectroscopy (see ESI†).
Having identified the most efficient catalysts, their performance
under various reaction conditions was ascertained, as summarized
in Table 1. During simple application of the reaction conditions 11 (a) T. Arai, A. Mishiro, N. Yokoyama, K. Suzuki and H. Sato, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 5338; (b) T. Arai, A. Mishiro, E. Matsumura,
A. Awata and M. Shirasugi, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 11219.
12 T. Arai and Y. Ogino, Molecules, 2012, 17, 6170.
examined in solid-phase catalysis at room temperature, the
solution phase catalysis using PyBodine(Ala)–Cu(OAc)2 gave
¨
(R)-3a in 99% yield with 82% ee (entry 1), while PyBodine(Pro)– 13 S. Bhor, G. Anilkumar, M. K. Tse, M. Klawonn, C. Dobler,
B. Bitterlich, A. Grotevendt and M. Beller, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 3393.
14 E. T. J. Strong, S. A. Cardile, A. L. Brazeau, M. C. Jennings,
Cu(OAc)2 gave (S)-3a in 99% yield with 55% ee (entry 2). In the
case of the PyBodine(Ala)–Cu(OAc)2 catalyzed cycloaddition,
R. McDonald and N. D. Jones, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 10575.
reducing the reaction temperature to À40 1C improved the 15 Representative examples of oxazolidine-consisting chiral ligands:
(a) H. Nakano, K. Osone, M. Takeshita, E. Kwon, C. Seki,
H. Matsuyama, N. Takano and Y. Kohari, Chem. Commun., 2010,
46, 4827; (b) H. Xu and C. Wolf, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 8026;
enantioselectivity to 90% ee, although the yield was reduced to
50% even when the reaction was allowed to proceed for 50 h
(entry 3). It was, however, possible to improve the catalytic
activity by adding 4A MS, producing (R)-3a in 99% yield with
94% ee after 28 h (entry 4). When using PyBodine(Pro)–
Cu(OAc)2, the addition of 4A MS produces only minimal effect
(entries 5 and 6).
(c) S. Liu and C. Wolf, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 2965; (d) C. Wolf and S. Liu,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 10996; (e) Y.-F. Kang, L. Liu, R. Wang,
Y.-F. Zhou and W.-J. Yan, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2005, 347, 243;
( f ) H. J. Zhu, J. X. Jiang, S. Saebo and C. U. Pittman Jr., J. Org.
Chem., 2005, 70, 261; (g) P. H. Schneider, H. S. Schrekker,
C. C. Silveira, L. A. Wessjohann and A. L. Braga, Eur. J. Org. Chem.,
2004, 2715, reviews; (h) C. Wolf and H. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2011,
47, 3339; (i) C. Caputo and N. D. Jones, Dalton Trans., 2007, 4627.
The scope of the applicability of the PyBodine(Ala)–Cu(OAc)2
catalyst under optimal reaction conditions was subsequently 16 (a) T. Arai, M. Watanabe, A. Fujiwara, N. Yokoyama and
A. Yanagisawa, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 5978; (b) T. Arai,
N. Yokoyama and A. Yanagisawa, Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 2052;
(c) T. Arai, N. Yokoyama, A. Mishiro and H. Sato, Angew. Chem., Int.
examined, generating the results summarized in Table 2.
Various azomethine arylimines were successfully converted to
the desired products in a highly enantioselective manner. Use
of azomethine cyclohexylimine resulted in the desired product
with 88% ee (entry 10) while the reaction of 1a with methyl
propiolate resulted in up to 98% ee (entry 8).
Ed., 2010, 49, 7895.
17 For a mechanism Cu(I)-catalyzed [3+2]-cycloaddition using Cu(II)
complexes, see (a) K. Kamata, S. Yamaguchi, M. Kotani, K. Yamaguchi
and N. Mizuno, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 2407; (b) T. Oishi,
K. Yoshimura, K. Yamaguchi and N. Mizuno, Chem. Lett., 2010, 1086.
c
7778 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 7776--7778
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013