preparation of the bis-spiroacetal core of spirolide B.9
The 1,4-diketone motif may be constructed by a number
of ways, often requiring several steps.10 In the search for a
convergent strategy, allowing the presence of functionality
and protecting groups on the carbon backbone, the Stetter
reaction appeared as an attractive method to elaborate
efficiently the bis-spiroacetal I present in toxins 1 and 2
(Scheme 1). It was thus envisioned that the coupling of an
aldehyde (or an acylsilane) III and a vinyl ketone such as
IV in the presence of a suitable organocatalyst (usually
a N-heterocyclic carbene (NHC)) would deliver the 1,4-
diketone framework II. A careful choice of the protecting
groups on the alcohol functions within the chain would
then allow the construction of the desired bis-spiroacetal I
after acid-catalyzed deprotection and ketalization. We
report here that NHC-mediated Stetter and sila-Stetter
processes followed by the acid-catalyzed ketalization effec-
tively offer a straightforward access to the bis-spiroacetal
skeleton. A cascade process also allows both events to be
carried out in a one-pot operation.
first the influence of the nature of the partner III in the
Stetter reaction, using as precursors, aldehyde 3 or acylsi-
lane 4aand vinylketone 5ainthe presenceof NHC-catalyst
precursor A.13 As summarized in Table 1, using aldehyde 3
and various amounts of catalyst invariably led to a mixture
of both the desired product 6a and the corresponding
acyloin 7 (entries 1À3, Table 1). In contrast, we were
pleased to observe that acylsilane 4a led to 6a in good
yield, without a trace of 7(entries4À5), thus notably extend-
ing the scope of the sila-Stetter reaction.12 Increasing the
quantity of acylsilane however produced small amount of
7 (entry 6).
Table 1. Stetter versus Sila-Stetter Reaction
Scheme 1. Retrosynthetic Analysis
entry 3 or 4a (equiv) A (mol %) time (h) 6a/7a yieldb (%)
1
2
3
4
5
6
3 (1.0)
30
15
30
30
15
30
2
81:19
72:28
65:35
100:0
100:0
80:20
61
68
77
67
89
90
3 (1.5)
2.5
2
3 (2.0)
4a (1.0)c
4a (1.5)c
4a (2.0)c
1.5
3
3
a Measured by 1H NMR of the crude reaction mixture. b Isolated
yield of 6a after column chromatography. c 4 equiv of i-PrOH were used.
Although the pioneering work by Stetter11 and others
has shown that this coupling may be carried out starting
from a large variety of aldehydes, few examples have been
reported to date on aliphatic partners. Moreover, acyloins
resulting from the homocoupling of the aldehyde are often
present as byproducts. Recent work by Scheidt et al12
however showed that this could be circumvented, using
acylsilanes instead of aldehydes, although mostly aromatic
acylsilanes were tested during this work. We thus studied
Optimization of the sila-Stetter reaction showed that
decreasing the quantity of acylsilane was detrimental to
the conversion, with 1.5À2 equiv leading to optimal re-
sults. Dry isopropyl alcohol (4 equiv) and DBU as a
base were also shown to provide the highest yields. With
these optimized conditions in hand, the methodology
was extended to a large variety of aliphatic acylsilane14
and enone15 precursors (Supporting Information), as illus-
trated in Scheme 2.
tert-Butyldimethylsilyl and benzyl substituents were
selected as orthogonal protecting groups for alcohol
functions, so that they can be deprotected selectively if
needed (vide infra). 1,4-Diketones were obtained in good
to excellent yields.16 Reaction time ranged between 3 and
(5) Mc Cauley, J. A.; Nagasawa, K.; Lander, P. A.; Mischke, S. G.;
Semones, M. A.; Kishi, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 7647–7648.
(6) Sakamoto, S.; Sakazaki, H.; Hagiwara, K.; Kamada, K.; Ishii,
K.; Noda, T.; Inoue, M.; Hirama, M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43,
6505–6510.
(7) Nakamura, S.; Inagaki, J.; Sugimoto, T.; Kudo, M.; Nakajima,
M.; Hashimoto, S. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 4075–4078.
(8) (a) Lu, C.-D.; Zakarian, A. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 3161–3163. (b)
Stivala, C.; Zakarian, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 3774–3776.
(9) Ishihara, J.; Ishizaka, T.; Suzuki, T.; Hatakeyama, S. Tetrahedron
Lett. 2004, 45, 7855–7858.
(10) (a) Miyakoshi, T. Org. Prep. Proc. Int. 1989, 21, 659–704. (b)
Enders, D.; Niemeier, O.; Henseler, A. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5606–5655.
(c) Setzer, P.; Beauseigneur, A.; Pearson-Long, M. S. M.; Bertus, P.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 8691–8694.
(13) A screening of other thiazolium salts led to similar results
(Supporting Information). Catalyst A was finally selected, being the
easiest to handle.
(14) Clark, C. T.; Milgram, B. C.; Scheidt, K. A. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
3977–3980.
(15) Nahm, S.; Weinreb, S. M. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815–
3818.
(16) It was also possible to perform the reaction between acylsilanes 4
and other Michael acceptors such as acrylonitrile (51%), methylacrylate
(36%), and vinylsulfone (26%) (unoptimized yields) (Supporting
Information).
(11) (a) Stetter, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1976, 15, 639–647. (b)
Moore, J. L.; Rovis, T. Top. Curr. Chem. 2009, 291, 77–144.
(12) (a) Scheidt, K. A.; Bharadwaj, A. R.; Mattson, A. E. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 2314–2315. (b) Mattson, A. E.; Bharadwaj, A. R.;
Zuhl, A. M.; Scheidt, K. A. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 5715–5724.
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX