ChemComm
Communication
(t) H. L. Shimp and G. C. Micalizio, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65, 5908–5915;
(u) T. K. Macklin and G. C. Micalizio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131,
1392–1393; (v) V. Jeso and G. C. Micalizio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132,
11422–11424; (w) Y. Lu, S. K. Woo and M. J. Krische, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2011, 133, 13876–13879; (x) V. Jeso, L. Cherry, T. K. Macklin, S. C. Pan,
P. V. LoGrasso and G. C. Micalizio, Org. Lett., 2011, 13, 5108–5111;
(y) D. Yang and G. C. Micalizio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134,
15237–15240; (z) P. S. Diez and G. C. Micalizio, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2012, 51, 5152–5156.
3 (a) O. G. Kulinkovich, S. V. Sviridov, D. A. Vasilevski and
T. S. Pritytskaya, J. Org. Chem. USSR, 1989, 25, 2027. For reviews,
see: (b) A. Wolan and Y. Six, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 15–61; (c) A. Wolan
and Y. Six, Tetrahedron, 2010, 66, 3097–3133; (d) O. G. Kulinkovich
and A. de Meijere, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 2789–2834; (e) F. Sato,
H. Urabe and S. Okamoto, Chem. Rev., 2000, 100, 2835–2886.
4 (a) H. A. Reichard, M. McLaughlin, M. Z. Chen and G. C. Micalizio, Eur. J.
Org. Chem., 2010, 391–409; (b) H. A. Reichard and G. C. Micalizio, Chem.
Sci., 2011, 2, 573–589.
dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR), we explored the reductive cross-
coupling of achiral aromatic imines with suitably substituted chiral
allylic alcohols. As illustrated at the top of Fig. 3, conversion of one
equivalent of an imine to a presumed equilibrating mixture of
titanaaziridines was followed by addition of an excess of a chiral
allylic alkoxide (1.3–2.0 equivalents) to consume as much of the
equilibrating mixture as possible. Aqueous work up then delivered
stereodefined homoallylic amine products. In all cases, these reduc-
tive cross-coupling reactions proceeded with exceptional levels of
stereochemical control and in up to 87% yield – an efficiency that is
based on the imine and due to the dynamic stereochemical
behaviour of the organometallic intermediate.
From a synthetic perspective, we note that this DKR is compatible
with a range of substrates that include TMS- and Bn-substituted
aromatic imines (eqn (5) and (6)), as well as coupling partners
harbouring cyclic and acyclic allylic alcohols, di- and trisubstituted
alkenes, as well as vinyl bromides (eqn (7)–(9)).
5 (a) M. Takahashi, M. McLaughlin and G. C. Micalizio, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2009, 48, 3648–3652; (b) I. L. Lysenko, H. G. Lee and J. K. Cha, Org.
Lett., 2009, 11, 3132–3134; (c) M. Z. Chen, M. McLaughlin, M. Takahashi,
M. A. Tarselli, D. Yang, S. Umemura and G. C. Micalizio, J. Org. Chem.,
2010, 75, 8048–8059; (d) see also: ref. 2s.
While dynamic kinetic resolution of Cp2Zr–imine complexes has
been studied by Tunge and Norton and employed as a strategy to
prepare chiral a-amino acids,9 to our knowledge these studies
describe the first observations consistent with stereochemical lability
of titanaaziridine intermediates derived from Ti(Oi-Pr)4, the first
dynamic kinetic resolution of metal–imine complexes derived from
Ti(IV)–alkoxides,6,10,11 and establish a convenient method for the
convergent asymmetric synthesis of highly substituted chiral homo-
allylic amines. Notably, the facile stereochemical isomerization of
the organometallic intermediate observed here should prove useful
for asymmetric metallacycle-mediated cross-coupling reactions
of precious imines, where readily accessible chiral allylic alcohols
can be used to dictate the absolute stereochemical course of C–C
bond-formation.12
6 In ref. 5b, experiments were conducted with a slight excess of imine
(1.2 eq.), and yields for highly selective reactions were reported from
60–65%. This efficiency, where yields are reported >60% reflects an
observation consistent with DKR of the presumed Ti–imine complex.
Details regarding efficiency associated with the DKR cannot be
extracted from the results reported, as simple kinetic resolution can
be envoked to explain the vast majority of product formation.
7 For reactions with aromatic imines, see: (a) G. Yao, Y. Yoshida and
F. Sato, Synlett, 1997, 1353–1354. For reactions with aliphatic imines,
see: (b) M. A. Tarselli and G. C. Micalizio, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 4596–4599.
8 TMS–imine 9 was generated in situ from treatment of benzaldehyde
with LiHMDS. For examples of the use of this process in
Ti-mediated reductive cross-coupling reactions with allylic alcohols,
see ref. 2s.
9 (a) J. A. Tunge, D. A. Gately and J. R. Norton, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1999,
121, 4520–4521; (b) S. A. Cummings, J. A. Tunge and J. R. Norton,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4669–4679.
10 The conclusions made from this study assume the intermediacy of
racemic Ti–imine complexes similar to that which has been
observed in related chemistry of Cp2Zr–imine complexes (see
ref. 9). The mechanism for interconversion between these presumed
chiral intermediates may include that based on radical homolysis of
the sTi–C bond and subsequent reformation of the metallacycle.
Such a mechanism would imply that aryl imines would be superior
substrates to aliphatic imines in this DKR due to an enhanced
stability of the resulting benzylic radical. While not presented in the
body of the current manuscript, we have explored the potential
utility of aliphatic imines in this resolution process. Unfortunately,
when an aliphatic imine is employed as limiting reagent, we have
not been able to achieve yields of the homoallylic amine product
over 25%. The reasons associated with the divergent efficiency of
this process could be related to a number of factors that include the
different reaction conditions required for aliphatic imines (see
ref. 7b) and the stability of radical intermediates derived from
homolysis of the sTi–C bond of the presumed titanaaziridne
intermediate.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health
(GM080266).
Notes and references
1 W. Reppe and W. J. Schweckendick, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem., 1948,
560, 104.
2 For recent examples of metallacycle-mediated intermolecular C–C bond
formation in natural product synthesis, see: (a) V. Bernardes, N. Kann,
A. Riera, A. Moyano, M. A. Pericas and A. E. Green, J. Org. Chem., 1995,
60, 6670–6671; (b) M. E. Krafft, Y. Y. Cheung and K. A. Abboud, J. Org.
Chem., 2001, 66, 7443–7448; (c) B. M. Trost and J. L. Gunzner, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2001, 123, 9449–9450; (d) J. Chan and T. F. Jamison, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 11514–11515; (e) E. A. Colby, K. C. O’Brien and
T. F. Jamison, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 998–999; ( f ) J. Chan and
T. F. Jamison, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 10682–10691; (g) B. M. Trost
and P. E. Harrington, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126, 5028–5029;
(h) B. M. Trost and J. P. N. Papillon, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
13618–13619; (i) E. A. Colby, K. C. O’Brien and T. F. Jamison, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 4297–4307; ( j) B. M. Trost, P. E. Harrington,
J. D. Chisholm and S. T. Wrobleski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127,
13598–13610; (k) B. M. Trost, J. P. N. Papillon and T. Bussbaumer,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 17921–17937; (l) S. Dixon, G. J. Gordon and
R. J. Whitby, Chem. Commun., 2005, 4303–4305; (m) R. M. Moslin and
T. F. Jamison, J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 9736–9745; (n) K. A. Keaton and
A. J. Phillips, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 2717–2719; (o) H. A. Reichard, J. C. Rieger
and G. C. Micalizio, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 7837–7840;
(p) J. K. Belardi and G. C. Micalizio, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47,
4005–4008; (q) K. Sa-ei and J. Montgomery, Tetrahedron, 2009, 65,
11 For
a report focused on the rate of enantiomer conversion
associated with Cp2-ligated titanaaziridines, see: L. Li, K. E. Kristian,
A. Han, J. R. Norton and W. Sattler, Organometallics, 2012, 31,
8218–8224.
12 The current contribution is of great synthetic value when the cost of
the imine far outweighs the cost of the allylic alcohol, as 1.3–2
equivalents of the chiral allylic alcohol are employed to engage the
Ti–imine complex in an efficient dynamic kinetic resolution. In cases
where the chiral allylic alcohol is significantly more expensive than
the imine coupling partner, potential users of this imine–allylic
alcohol coupling process should purse simple kinetic resolution
using the allylic alcohol coupling partner as limiting reagent. Such
a procedure has been described earlier (see ref. 5).
´
´
6707–6711; (r) A. Vazquez-Romero, L. Cardenas, E. Blasi, X. Verdaguer
and A. Riera, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3104–3107; (s) D. Yang and
G. C. Micalizio, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 9216–9219;
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013
Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 8857--8859 8859