.
Angewandte
Communications
Table 1: Optimization of the reaction conditions.[a]
limiting reagent, L5 was a significantly better ligand than L7
for the gold catalysis (compare entries 12 and 13). Moreover,
the reaction yield in the former case is nearly quantitative,
which is impressive considering the difficulties previously
encountered in trapping these reactive gold carbene species
and really showcased the opportunities in method develop-
ment based on ligand design/development. Other solvents
such as DCE (entry 14) and toluene (entry 15) were suitable
for this reaction, albeit not nearly as good as PhCl. Although
the oxidant, 8-methylquinoline N-oxide, had to be introduced
to the reaction slowly by a syringe pump to avoid over
oxidation, the reaction proceeded smoothly at ambient
temperature.
With the optimized reaction conditions given in Table 1,
entry 13, the scope of the transformation was first examined
with various carboxylic acids. As shown in Table 2 (entries 1–
6), various substituted benzoic acids reacted smoothly,
affording the desired products in mostly excellent yields.
Even a Bpin group was tolerated, and the relatively low yield
was due to the coelution of the boronated product 3 f with 8-
methylquinoline (entry 5). The reaction also worked well with
other conjugated acids such as thiophene-2-carboxylic acid
(entry 7), trans-cinnamic acid (entry 8), trans-3-(2-furyl)-
acrylic acid (entry 9), and trans, trans-hexa-2,4-dienoic acid
(entry 10), thus delivering the corresponding products in
greater than 90% yields. Acetic acids with the a-carbon atom
functionalized by a 1-methylindol-3-yl (entry 11), trimethyl-
silyl (entry 12), chloro (entry 13), and phenoxy group
(entry 14), were all suitable substrates, and functionalized a-
carboxymethyl ketones were again isolated in good to
excellent yields. The reaction with N-Boc-protected proline,
however, only resulted in a serviceable yield of the corre-
sponding product (entry 15). Other carboxylic acids such as
cyclopropanecarboxylic acid (entry 16) and adamantane-1-
carboxyclic acid (entry 17) also proceeded well. While these
reactions were run on a 0.2 mmol scale, a 3 mmol scale was
readily implemented with the reaction in entry 2 even with
only 2 mol% of the catalyst and 3c was isolated in 82% yield.
The reaction also proceeded smoothly with various
terminal alkynes. As shown in Table 3, phenylacetylene
(entry 1) and 1-ethynylcyclohexene (entry 4) were excellent
substrates, and so are the acetylenes substituted by cyclic
(entries 2 and 3) or remotely functionalized linear alkyl
groups (entries 5–7). The reaction yields were good to
Entry 1a/2a Catalyst
Yield [%][b]
1
2
1:1.2
1:1.2
[LAuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
<7[c]
11
4
[(Me-DalPhos)AuCl](5 mol%)/
NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
3
1:1.2
[(Mor-DalPhos)AuCl](5 mol%)/
68
NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
1:1.2
1:1.2
1:1.2
1:1.2
1:1.2
1:1.2
1:1.2
1:1.2
1.3:1
1.3:1
1.3:1
1.3:1
[L1AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
68
68
18
75
84
30
79
63
86
98[d]
95
88
4
[L2AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L3AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L4AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L5AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L6AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L7AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L8AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L7AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L5AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)
4
[L5AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)[e]
4
[L5AuCl](5 mol%)/NaBArF (10 mol%)[f]
4
[a] The reaction was run with everything except the oxidant in a vial
capped with a septum, and the oxidant was introduced into the reaction
mixture over a 12 h period using a syringe pump. Initially, [1a]=0.1m.
[b] Measured by 1H NMR analysis using diethyl phthalate as the internal
standard. [c] L=Ph3P, IPr, or BrettPhos. The 1H NMR spectra of the
crude reaction mixture were mostly messy. [d] Yield of isolated product
was 96%. [e] DCE was used as the solvent. [f] Toluene was used as the
solvent.
À
excellent. Even with heteroatoms placed close to the C C
triple bond and hence to the in situ formed electrophilic gold
carbene center, this intramolecular reaction still led to a good
(entry 8) or serviceable yield (entry 9).
The ligand optimization by modification of the pendant
piperidine/morpholine ring deserves further examination. In
our previous carboxamide trapping chemistry,[6] the smaller
Me-DalPhos was found to be equally effective as a bidentate
ligand such as Mor-DalPhos. On the contrary, in this
chemistry, the steric size of the pendant amino group is
crucial for the reaction outcome (see Table 1). We attribute
the difference to the decreased nucleophilicity of the carbonyl
oxygen group in the carboxylic acid[8] as compared to that in
the carboxamide. It is reasonable to suspect that steric
shielding around the gold carbene center would facilitate, to
Figure 1. a) known ligands. b) Newly developed P,N-bidentate ligands.
Ad=adamantyl.
on the reaction outcome (entry 10). Interestingly, replacing
the methyl groups in L7 with bigger phenyl groups (L8)
resulted in a yield even lower than that obtained with by Mor-
DalPhos (entry 11). This result, along with that of L3, suggest
that there is an optimal steric bulk for the pendant six-
membered ring in this reaction. When benzoic acid was the
2
ꢀ 2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2013, 52, 1 – 6
These are not the final page numbers!