Paper
RSC Advances
compounds 1h, 1j, and 1k are 16 times lower than that of FCZ
against C. kef. in vitro (with an MIC80 value of 0.0625 mg mL21).
The MIC80 value of compounds 1a and 1k are 32 times lower
than that of FCZ against C. alb. Y0109 in vitro (with an MIC80
value of 0.0156 mg mL21).
General procedure for the preparation of the compounds 1a–o
A mixture of NaN3 (100 mg, 1.4 mmol), 4-Cl benzyl bromide
(200 mg, 1.2 mmol), and DMSO (15 mL) was stirred at room
temperature for 6 h. Then compound 7 (200 mg, 0.6 mmol),
sodium ascorbate (20 mg), CuSO4?5H2O (25 mg), and H2O(1
mL) were added, the solution was stirred at room temperature
for another 2 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. The
reaction solution was then added to 10 mL NH3?H2O, and
extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was acidified
with dilute hydrochloric acid, then the aqueous layer was
adjusted to around pH 7 using saturated sodium bicarbonate
solution, and extracted with ethyl acetate, the organic layer
was washed with water and brine, and dried with Na2SO4.
Concentration in vacuum afforded compound 1a (201 mg,
Conclusions
In summary, a novel series of antifungal agents have been
designed and synthesized. In vitro antifungal activity assays
indicate that most of the compounds showed moderate
antifungal activities against both systemic pathogenic fungi
and dermatophytes. The activity did not differ significantly in
terms of the strength of the electron-withdrawing or donating
groups substituted on the benzene ring. The disubstituted
activity was not as good as the monosubstituted activity.
Several of the compounds showed high in vitro antifungal
activity with a broad spectrum, and are valuable for further
evaluation.
1
67%). Mp: 94.9–96.4 uC; H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3) d: 8.09 (1
H, s, triazole–H), 7.77 (1 H, s, triazole–H), 7.19–7.60 (5 H, m,
Ar–H), 7.04 (1 H, s, triazole–H), 6.73–6.81 (2 H, m, Ar–H), 5.50
(2 H, s, Ar–CH2–), 5.46 (1 H, s, OH), 4.52 (1 H, d, J = 13.8 Hz,
triazole–CH2–), 4.39 (1 H, d, J = 14.1 Hz, triazole–CH2–), 3.61 (1
H, d, J = 14.4 Hz, triazole–CH2–), 3.54 (1 H, d, J = 12.9 Hz,
triazole–CH2–), 3.15 (1 H, d, J = 13.8 Hz, –CH2–), 2.70 (1 H, d, J
= 13.8 Hz, –CH2–), 2.11–2.29 (2 H, m, NCH* CH2CH3), 1.24–
2
1.30 (2 H, m, NCH2CH* CH3), 0.65–0.70 (3 H, m,
2
Experimental part
NCH2CH2CH* ); 13C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3) d: 164.7, 160.8,
3
Melting points were measured on a Yamato MP-21 melting-
point apparatus and are uncorrected. 1H and 13C NMR spectra
were recorded in CDCl3 unless otherwise indicated with a
Bruker AC-300P spectrometer or a Bruker Avance II 600
spectrometer, using TMS as the internal standard. High
resolution electron spray ionization mass spectra (HR ESI
MS) were recorded on an Agilent 6538 Q-TOF mass spectro-
meter. The solvents and reagents were used as received or
dried prior to use as needed.
152.7, 146.5, 135.6, 134.1, 131.7, 131.6, 128.4, 124.8, 123.8,
113.3, 105.9, 74.1, 74.0, 60.0, 60.0, 59.3, 58.0, 57.9, 55.3, 51.2,
22.1, 13.1; HR ESI MS: calcd for C24H26ClF2N7O, [M + H]+ m/z:
502.1928; found: 502.1938.
The target compounds 1b–o were synthesized by the same
synthetic procedure that was used for compound 1a.
Acknowledgements
1-(1H-1,2,4-Triazole-1-yl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-3-
propylamino-2-propanol (6)
This work was supported by the National Natural Science
Foundation of China (No. 20772153), Shanghai Leading
Academic Discipline Project (No. B906) and by Creativity and
Innovation Training Program of Second Military Medical
University (No. MS2012047).
A mixture of compound 5 (33.3 g, 0.10 mol), CH3CH2OH (500
mL), Et3N (50 mL), and propylamine (8.85 g, 0.15 mol) was
stirred and refluxed for 6 h. The reaction was monitored by
TLC. After filtration, the filtrate was evaporated under reduced
pressure. Water was added to the residue, extracted with ethyl
acetate twice, the organic layers were combined, washed with
saturated NaCl solution twice, dried over anhydrous Na2SO4
and evaporated to get compound 6 (23.4 g, 79%).
Notes and references
1 C. Beck-Sague and W. R. Jarvis, J. Infect. Dis., 1993, 167,
1247–1251.
2 C. Pannuti, R. Gingrich, M. A. Pfaller, C. Kao and R.
P. Wenzel, Cancer, 1992, 69, 2653–2662.
1-(1H-1,2,4-Triazole-1-yl)-2-(2,4-difluorophenyl)-3-(N-propyl-
N-propargyl amino)-2-propanol (7)
3 J. P. Latge, Clin. Microbiol. Rev., 1999, 12, 310–350.
4 J. N. Steenbergen and A. Casadevall, J. Clin. Microbiol.,
2000, 38, 1974–1976.
5 D. J. Sheehan, C. A. Hitchcock and C. M. Sibley, Clin.
Microbiol. Rev., 1999, 12, 40–79.
6 I. A. Casalinuovo, P. Di Francesco and E. Garaci, Eur. Rev.
Med. Pharmacol. Sci., 2004, 8, 69–77.
7 H. L. Hoffman, E. J. Ernst and M. E. Klepser, Expert Opin.
Invest. Drugs, 2000, 9, 593–605.
A mixture of compound 6 (5.92 g, 0.02 mol), propargyl
bromide (4.72 g, 0.04 mol), KI (332 mg, 0.002 mol), K2CO3
(6.90 g, 0.05 mol), and CH3CN (200 mL) was stirred at room
temperature for 6 h. The reaction was monitored by TLC. After
the reaction, the solid was filtrated off, washed with CH3CN,
and the filtrate was concentrated in a vacuum. Column
chromatography of the residue afforded compound 7 as a
white solid (4.14 g, 62%).
8 Y. Aoyama, Y. Yoshida and R. Sato, J. Biol. Chem., 1984, 259,
1661–1666.
RSC Adv.
This journal is ß The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013