Banerjee et al.
receptors to neurotransmitter.5,13,14 The main advantage
of photorelease of a bioactive compound from its caged
form over conventional mixing of reactants is that caged
compounds allow time resolutions of microseconds rather
than milliseconds to be achieved. In addition, photolytic
release of biologically active compounds can be performed
with high spatial resolution, and this has been exploited
for identifying specific receptors in neuronal circuits,15-18
and in the synthesis of DNA chips.19
A caged compound suitable for the investigation of
biological systems must satisfy the following criteria:
(1) The compound must be soluble and stable in water
at neutral pH.
(2) The compound should be photolyzable at long
wavelengths to avoid cell damage (visible region pre-
ferred, vide infra).
(3) The quantum yield of the photorelease should be
sufficiently high that the bioactive compound is released
in quantities adequate for the proposed studies.
(4) The release of the bioactive molecule should occur
in microseconds so the photolysis is not rate limiting for
the biological reaction to be investigated.
However, they suffer from low solubility in an aqueous
medium or, in the case of the 2-nitroveratrole group and
coumarin derivatives, from a slow rate of release of the
bioactive compound. Thus, a photolabile caging group
that has all the desired characteristics of a compound
suitable for investigating biological reaction mechanisms
(vide supra) is still to be made.
The o-nitrobenzyl group is one of the most widely
applied photolabile caging groups in use today. In 1966
Barltrop et al.26 reported the release of benzoic acid from
its nitrobenzyl ester upon photolysis. Since then, this
caging group has found a variety of applications in
biology, but it has a few shortcomings that limit its
applicability. First, short-wavelength UV light is required
for deprotection (“uncaging”).27 Second, after the initial
photochemical excitation, the molecule goes through a
series of “dark” steps before the bioactive molecule is
released.28 It is estimated that there is a lag of a few
milliseconds after photolysis before the bioactive molecule
is released.28,29 This makes the caging group unsuitable
for studying fast reactions, which frequently occur on the
sub-millisecond time scale. Third, a reactive o-nitroso-
benzaldehyde is formed as a byproduct of the photolysis
reaction, and this can damage cells.27 Introduction of the
carboxyl group in the R-position of this group overcomes
most of these problems.5 Transient kinetic investigations
with a microsecond time resolution of neurotransmitter-
receptor-mediated reactions, which regulate signal trans-
mission between ∼1012 nerve cells in the brain,30 first
became possible with the use of this caging group.5,31
However, UV light is still required for uncaging.5
The desyl32,33 and 2-methoxy-5-nitrophenyl (MNP)34,35
groups are the two other photolabile caging groups that
are in common use. The desyl group suffers from low
solubility in aqueous medium, and both the desyl and
MNP groups absorb in the UV region, thus requiring
high-energy UV radiation for the uncaging step. Substi-
tuted coumarins were used by Furuta et al.24,25,36 to cage
phosphates and carboxylic acids. The quantum yield
when the coumarin protecting group is used (photolysis
wavelength 340 nm) was found to be dependent on the
substitution at the C-7 position.24 Although the quantum
yield of the 7-methoxy-substituted coumarins is 0.12 at
340 nm, that of the 7-acetoxy, 7-propionyloxy, and
7-hydroxy derivatives is about 0.06 at the same wave-
length. These caged compounds also have a low solubility
(5) The caged compound and the photolysis byproducts
must be biologically inert.
The stability of the caged compound in water is
important as any reaction or hydrolysis in the dark would
reduce the effective concentration of the bioactive com-
pound released by photolysis, and the released compound
would activate the biological system before measure-
ments begin. A second problem is that neurotransmitter
receptors are transiently inactivated (desensitized) dur-
ing prolonged (milliseconds) exposure to neurotransmit-
ter. Dark hydrolysis would lead to liberation of the
neurotransmitter and, therefore, to transient inactivation
of the receptor before the reaction can be investigated.
The wavelength of the radiation used to photolyze the
caged compound is also an important parameter. Most
of the photolabile caging groups developed so far are
uncaged with high-energy UV light. Radiation at short
wavelengths can damage living cells.20 Moreover, expen-
sive light sources, which are not simple to operate or
maintain, are required. Recently, the substituted 2-ni-
troveratrole group,21,22 the nitroindolines,7 the phenacyl
group,23 and substituted coumarins24,25 have been studied
as caging groups that can be removed by visible light.
(13) Udgaonkar, J . B.; Hess, G. P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1987,
84, 8758-8762.
(26) Barltrop, J . A.; Plant, P. J .; Schofield, P. J . Chem. Soc., Chem.
Commun. 1966, 22, 822-823.
(14) J ayaraman, V.; Thiran, S.; Hess, G. P. Biochemistry 1999, 38,
11372-11378.
(27) Amit, B.; Zehavi, U.; Patchornik, A. Isr. J . Chem. 1974, 12, 103-
(15) Dalva, M. B.; Katz, L. C. Science (Washington, D.C.) 1994, 265,
255-258.
113.
(28) Schupp, H.; Wong, W. K.; Schnabel, W. J . Photochem. 1987,
36, 85-97.
(29) Zhu, Q. Q.; Schnabel, W.; Schupp, H. J . Photochem. 1987, 39,
317-332.
(16) Denk, W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1994, 91, 6629-6633.
(17) Li, H. Y.; Avery, L.; Denk, W.; Hess, G. P. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. 1997, 94, 5912-5916.
(18) Ko¨tter, R.; Staiger, J . F.; Zilles, K.; Luhmann, H. J . Neuroscience
1998, 86, 265-277.
(30) Kandel, E. R.; Schwartz, J . H.; J essell, T. M. Principles of
Neural Science, 4th ed.; McGraw-Hill: New York, 2000; p 1414.
(31) Matsubara, N.; Billington, A. P.; Hess, G. P. Biochemistry 1992,
31, 5507-5514.
(19) Pirrung, M. C.; Wang, L. X.; Montague-Smith, M. P. Org. Lett.
2001, 3, 1105-1108 and references therein.
(20) Epel, D.; Hemela, K.; Shick, M.; Patton, C. Am. Zool. 1999, 39,
271-278.
(32) Gee, K. R.; Kueper, L. W., III; Barnes, J .; Dudley, G.; Givens,
R. S. J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 1228-1233.
(21) Bochet, C. G. Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 6341-6346.
(22) Bochet, C. G. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2001, 40, 2071-2073.
(23) Banerjee, A.; Lee, K.; Yu, Q.; Fang, A. G.; Falvey, D. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 4635-4638.
(33) Sheehan, J . C.; Wilson, R. M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1964, 86,
5277-5281.
(34) Kuzmic, P.; Pavlickova, L.; Soucek, M. Collect. Czech. Chem.
Commun. 1986, 51, 1293-1300.
(24) Furuta, T.; Iwamura, M. Methods Enzymol. 1998, 291, 50-63.
(25) Furuta, T.; Wang, S. H.; Dantzker, J . L.; Dore, T. M.; Bybee,
W. J .; Callaway, E. M.; Denk, W.; Tsien, R. Y. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
U.S.A. 1999, 96, 1193-1200.
(35) Ramesh, D.; Wieboldt, R.; Niu, L.; Carpenter, B. K.; Hess, G.
P. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993, 90, 11074-11078.
(36) Furuta, T.; Torigai, H.; Sugimoto, M.; Iwamura, M. J . Org.
Chem. 1995, 60, 3953-3956.
8362 J . Org. Chem., Vol. 68, No. 22, 2003