Scheme 2. Regio- and Diastereoselective Epoxidation
Figure 2. Revised retrosynthesis based on diastereotopos-differ-
entiating RCM.
The synthesis of the Gosteli-type allyl vinyl ether 19 by
an aldol condensation approach is outlined in Scheme 3.29
Etherification of 2,4-pentadienol 20 followed by carbo-
diimide-mediated esterification30 furnished the acetate 21
which was subjectedto a stepwise aldol condensation using
4-phenylselenylbutanal31 as a synthetic equivalent for
3-butenal to afford the phenylselenides 22 (Z:E = 3:2)
which were separated by preparative HPLC. Oxidation of
the selenides (E,E)- as well as (Z,E)-22 triggered elimina-
tion32 to provide the Gosteli-type allyl vinyl ethers (E,E)-
and (Z,E)-19. Subsequent CAGC of (Z,E)-19 delivered the
R-keto ester (S)-23 which could serve as a building block
for the total synthesis of (þ)-ecklonialactone B.
With the diene 4 in hand, opportunities for a regio- and
diastereoselective epoxidation of the C12/C13 double
bond were explored (Scheme 2). An initial attempt using
m-CPBA (1 equiv) was highly regioselective. However, the
undesired diastereomer 15 was obtained exclusively. This
outcome was not unexpected considering the result of
Hickmann who obtained the same (12Re,13Si)-diastereo-
face differentiation (dr = 7:1) using the corresponding
enyne.25 Taking advantage of the intrinsic (12Re,13Si)-
nucleophilicity of the diene 4, a two-step procedure was
then employed to finalize the synthesis. Thus, subjecting
the diene 4 to NBS (1 equiv) in aqueous acetone followed
by treatment of the isolated and purified bromohydrin
intermediate with Ag2O in toluene at reflux furnished
(ꢀ)-3 whose NMR data matched thosereported byKurata
The implementation of the projected nine-step synthetic
sequence from (E,E)-19 to (ꢀ)-ecklonialactone B (3) is
outlined in Scheme 4. CAGC of (E,E)-19 to the R-keto
ester (R)-23 and subsequent reduction by K-Selectride
afforded the R-hydroxy ester 24. The crucial diastereotopos-
differentiating RCM was best performed using the
HoveydaꢀGrubbs catalyst33 (11b, 0.01 equiv) at ambient
temperature; we were pleased to discover that the trans-
1,2-disubstituted cyclopentenoid 25 was thus isolated in
very good yield and diastereoselectivity (g95:5 according
to NMR analysis). Reductive homologation of 25 to the
corresponding secondary alcohol was followed by an
esterification using the Yamaguchi protocol which deliv-
ered the triene 26. We then turned our attention to devising
conditions that would enable the much desired Z-selective
RCM of 27 to afford 12,13-desepoxy ecklonialactone (4).
Disappointingly, however, and despite the screening of
€
as well as Furstner. At this point, we decided to carry the
synthetic material toward the non-natural (þ)-9,10-dihydro
ecklonialactone B (2) whose partial synthesis from the
natural ecklonialactones A and B had been reported by
Kurata.26 Accordingly, (ꢀ)-3 was hydrogenated using
Adam’s catalyst27 to afford (þ)-2 whose spectroscopic
data were in accordance with those reported.
In pursuit of a streamlined synthetic sequence we next
implemented a revised retrosynthesis which hinged on the
success of a Z-selective RCM for the ring closure of the
macrolactone 4 from the triene 16 and a diastereotopos-
differentiating RCM28 for formation of the 1,2-trans-
disubstituted cyclopentenoid 17 from the R-hydroxy ester
18 (Figure 2); 18 would be accessible by a sequence of
enantio- and diastereoselective transformations from the
Gosteli-type allyl vinyl ether (E,E)-19.
(29) Hiersemann, M. Synthesis 2000, 1279–1290.
(30) (a) Hassner, A.; Krepski, L. R.; Alexanian, V. Tetrahedron 1978,
34, 2069–2076. (b) Neises, B.; Steglich, W. Angew. Chem. 1978, 90, 556–
557.
(31) (a) Haraguchi, K.; Tanaka, H.; Hayakawa, H.; Miyasakai, T.
Chem. Lett. 1988, 931–934. (b) Haraguchi, K.; Tanaka, H.; Miyasakai,
T. Synthesis 1989, 434–436.
(25) Hickmann, V. A. Schutzgruppenfreie enantioselektive Total-
synthese von Ecklonialacton A und B sowie biologische Tests aktiver
€
Naturstoffe. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technische Universitat Dortmund,
2011.
(26) Kurata, K.; Taniguchi, K.; Shiraishi, K.; Suzuki, M. Phyto-
chemistry 1993, 33, 155–159.
(27) Voorhees, V.; Adams, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1922, 44, 1397–
1405.
(28) (a) Huwe, C. M.; Velder, J.; Blechert, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl. 1996, 35, 2376–2378. (b) Lautens, M.; Hughes, G. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 129–131.
(32) (a) Sharpless, K. B.; Young, M. W.; Lauer, R. F. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1973, 14, 1979–1982. (b) Sharpless, K. B.; Lauer, R. F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 2697–2699.
(33) Kingsbury, J. S.; Harrity, J. P. A.; Bonitatebus, P. J.; Hoveyda,
A. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 791–799.
(34) Stewart, I. C.; Ung, T.; Pletnev, A. A.; Berlin, J. M.; Grubbs,
R. H.; Schrodi, Y. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 1589–1592.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C